a reply to: Peeple
Thanks, Peeple, your post on this is well written and elucidated, and I appreciate that. However, there are, perhaps, more possibilities in
conjecture from your research per that which you drew, already.
Such as, this, could mean something else entirely:
Now we reach the zero point, which could mean various things, scientific breakthrough or the contact moment, but definitely implies the end of
superstitious lore like religion and ET and with that the crumbling of the control loop.
Just because the MILAB (military abduction, pov), represents a wish to politically do away with religions, as they've repetitively meant more war,
more people dying and more cultures becomes more disparate and separate, does NOT mean, really, there is no G-D, nor true text of His/Her definitive
teachings. However, I would err on the side of caution, being truly, every text we have presently is likely just a now more than convoluted result of
man's interpretation and man's influence..... However, that doesn't mean God didn't speak to Moses, or in fact, someone else, divinely inspired to
take an oral story/history down. But that has long been polluted and over edited now, for other purposes that G-d's obviously, so we can hardly trust
But more what I am thinking, is what your research shows more than anything is none of us can trust what we would have previously called "empirical"
evidence, and therefore, would have trusted it more than anything (say, gut instincts, for instance) any longer: therefore, what we see, report,
experience, report, feel, see and experience, and then: yes, report, is no longer the empirical enth degree of evidentiary anything: for we can
probably be made to see, feel, hear, experience almost anything, which would totally set "empirical" in definitive terms, on its ear (forgive the
almost pun), and then we'd have to begin to consider we may not know almost anything, if our senses that we use to judge are that manipulatable and
Scary thought, isn't it. I argue this point constantly, and see the best minds alienated from my rather scientific mind, based on just that I argued
with that one singular thing. Because that turns everything sideways, potentially, and that being the case, is quite uncomfortable to believe: for
if it were so, then how do we negotiate, initiate, be interpretative of our investigative "proofs," or move forward to some other perceived paradigm
from there, the last perceived paradigm.
Having said that, Peeple, I think the other option you've neglected to mention is that this doesn't crumble Mr. Vallee's Control System Theory, at
all, but rather, uniquely, reinforces it, and makes us feel even more a lack of understanding of the complexities of the issue, plus a lack of
control, which is what the control system theory and the control loop represent....that ultimately, we have no control, true understanding,
interpretation or understanding, and we are rats running on a predictive wheel. Ergo, the control loop.
Everything points to it, much as everything in us as humans, wishes to reject it.