It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Open_Minded Skeptic
a reply to: Benevolent Heretic
This Republican dominated Congress continues to reach new heights of stupidity. Or maybe it's venality. They are so focused on doing anything they can to obstruct or challenge Obama, consequences be damned that they've actually gone past the infuriating right on into the absurd.
The law is upheld by power, why isn't neighbor Tom's word the law of the land? Because he's got less power than the U.S. government. So long as it is backed by force, the words of lesser entities are subject to the workings of the more powerful entity.
originally posted by: kaylaluv
a reply to: drewlander
Libya settled in order to get sanctions lifted. What sanctions does the U.S. have against Saudi Arabia? What makes you think the U.S. government would be willing to allow any seizing of S.A. assets in the U.S.?
I am not talking about suing terrorist cells directly. I was giving an example of a group of individuals (ISIS) suing the American government using their own court system (sharia). How willing would/should the U.S. be to pay up to ISIS?
originally posted by: Benevolent Heretic
originally posted by: crazyewok
a reply to: Benevolent Heretic
This bill has got to be the ONLY right thing the USA has done in the ME.
Most terrorism is exported from these barbarians.
About time we hit them.
Typical emotional response...
I don't know where you've been for 13 years, but we have "hit" the ME a time or two. Read the OP. Congress already regrets the veto and are working to change the law.
originally posted by: Kale7
a reply to: Benevolent Heretic
Let them sue I say, get the bad blood out of their system.
originally posted by: MysterX
But Obama didn't offer any alternative to the families suing Saudi...
The two top Republicans in Congress said they’re prepared to rewrite legislation allowing victims of the Sept. 11 attacks to sue Saudi Arabia -- less than 24 hours after Congress took the extraordinary step of overriding President Barack Obama’s veto of the measure to make it law.
Both House Speaker Paul Ryan and Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell said that the measure could have unintended consequences -- including the fact that it could leave U.S. soldiers open to retaliation by foreign governments.
originally posted by: Benevolent Heretic
Our government has given billions of dollars to the 9/11 families.
OKLAHOMA CITY -- What is the value of an American life claimed by terrorists? The answer, it turns out, depends on where and when you die. Congress gave the families of victims of the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks generous federal compensation payments. Most ended up millionaires. Congress gave the families of victims of the April 19, 1995, Oklahoma City bombing a two-year reprieve on their federal income taxes. Some ended up losing their homes. The families of victims of future terrorist attacks may get nothing at all. www.apfn.net...
originally posted by: AgarthaSeed
I'd like to point out one absurdity of all this that sticks out to me:
Members of Congress have ONE JOB.
ONE RESPONSIBILITY!
LEGISLATURE!... That's it!!!
If your job paid half as well and gave you half the benefits of being a Congressman, wouldn't you actually READ the bills that you're supposed to vote on?! Including bills that could have massive implications?
More and more every year Congress resembles an elementary school cafeteria complete with fruit cups and juice boxes littered everywhere.
originally posted by: Benevolent Heretic
Two days ago, Congress overwhelmingly passed an override of Obama's veto, which denied 9/11 families the right to sue the country of Saudi Arabia for the deaths and injuries they suffered. Obama vetoed this measure for very good reasons and was vocal about his reasons and even spoke to members of Congress about his concerns that such a law would "open a can of worms" that would allow other country's citizens to sue the US government AND would cause friction between the US and its allies.
Obama pleaded with Congress not to override his upcoming veto, so much that Republicans accused him of doing too much to kill the bill. In April of this year, John Corwyn (R-Texas), criticized Obama, saying,
“Unfortunately, the administration has worked to undercut progress of this legislation at every turn. It appears that the Obama administration is pulling out all the stops to keep this bill from moving forward before the president’s visit to Riyadh,” he said. “I wish the President and his aides would spend as much time and energy working with us in a bipartisan manner as they have working against us trying to prevent victims of terrorism from receiving the justice they deserve.”
Yes, Obama spent a lot of time and energy trying to stop this ridiculous and possibly dangerous legislation... But Congress didn't listen. Instead, they participated in an emotional power play and overrode Obama's veto. So, now, 9/11 families can sue Saudi Arabia.
Congress really stuck it to Obama, huh?
Well, now, 2 days later, realizing the possible history-making, negative effects of what they've done (which Obama profusely warned them about), Congress is having "buyer's remorse" and they need someone to blame for their own thoughtlessness. Hmmm... Looks like the target is their favorite one... Obama!
Even 28 lawmakers who had just helped to pass the first override of Obama’s presidency sent a letter to their own leaders Thursday saying maybe there should be changes.
So Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) leveled at least partial blame on Obama.
“That was a good example, it seems to me, of a failure to communicate early about the potential consequences of a piece of legislation,” McConnell told reporters before Congress got out of town until after the elections. “By the time everybody seemed to focus on some potential consequences of it, members had already basically taken a position.”
“I think it was just a ball dropped,” McConnell added. “I wish the president — I hate to blame everything on him, and I don’t — but it would have been helpful had he, uh, we had a discussion about this much earlier than last week.”
Interestingly, Obama's been discussing it since at least April. That's not "last week", Mitch.
Congre ss Now Blaming Obama For Its Embarrassing Override Of His Veto
originally posted by: Hazardous1408
a reply to: TheBulk
...hate...
One of our resident hatemongers doesn't like the shoe on the other foot...
Queue the world's smallest violin.