It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Trump up all nite obsessing on campaign, former Miss U and recommending porn

page: 3
20
<< 1  2    4  5  6 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Sep, 30 2016 @ 09:30 AM
link   
a reply to: Gryphon66

HA TJW's
.




posted on Sep, 30 2016 @ 09:31 AM
link   
best one

Remember, don't believe "sources said" by the VERY dishonest media. If they don't name the sources, the sources don't exist.

considering his entire campaign to slander clinton has been 'sources', pot kettle black.



posted on Sep, 30 2016 @ 09:33 AM
link   
Problem is America you have two choices . One is a lying snake and the other is lower than a lying snakes butt , good luck with that . On a side note , if the polls were decided on who had watched porn my guess is porn would win if everyone was honest .



posted on Sep, 30 2016 @ 09:35 AM
link   

originally posted by: hutch622
Problem is America you have two choices . One is a lying snake and the other is lower than a lying snakes butt , good luck with that . On a side note , if the polls were decided on who had watched porn my guess is porn would win if everyone was honest .


Actually, the choice is a reasonable, seasoned member of the political elite, who will mostly likely maintain the status quo for the most part ... and a hyped-up, possibly drugged up man-child who picks fights with ladies and thinks that makes him look "tough."



posted on Sep, 30 2016 @ 09:38 AM
link   
a reply to: LesMisanthrope

I got over my puritanical tendencies in the 1990s after listening to the Congressional Lewinsky investigation and trial and reading their Starr Report.



posted on Sep, 30 2016 @ 09:39 AM
link   

originally posted by: Gryphon66
Trump was up tweeting, indeed.

What was he tweeting about again?

Oh yes, a childish attack on a woman because she had the temerity to publicly call him out on his BS.

The only one sounding "puritanical" (not to mention hypocritical) is Donnie pretending to be disgusted by a sex tape.


The horror. Well, in a world where we now consider a tweet an attack, it's no wonder you'd clutch your pearls every time you see one.



posted on Sep, 30 2016 @ 09:40 AM
link   
a reply to: Gryphon66

So Hillary is a picture of innocence , has never lied to the public .



posted on Sep, 30 2016 @ 09:41 AM
link   

originally posted by: desert
a reply to: LesMisanthrope

I got over my puritanical tendencies in the 1990s after listening to the Congressional Lewinsky investigation and trial and reading their Starr Report.


You would hope. But we're talking about tweets.



posted on Sep, 30 2016 @ 09:45 AM
link   
This:


Anytime you see a story about me or my campaign saying "sources said," DO NOT believe it. There are no sources, they are just made up lies!


Lol! The irony.

This is the guy who drops unsubstantiated rumors and baseless "theories" constantly with the qualifier "I heard that somewhere."



posted on Sep, 30 2016 @ 09:47 AM
link   
Can you imagine if Trump said this?


edit on 30-9-2016 by Christosterone because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 30 2016 @ 09:48 AM
link   

originally posted by: hutch622
a reply to: Gryphon66

So Hillary is a picture of innocence , has never lied to the public .


Hmmm ... we're hanging scarecrows so early?

If you'd like me to argue that claim, quote me making it.




posted on Sep, 30 2016 @ 09:54 AM
link   
a reply to: Gryphon66




Hmmm ... we're hanging scarecrows so early? If you'd like me to argue that claim, quote me making it.


I honestly have no idea what that means .



posted on Sep, 30 2016 @ 09:56 AM
link   

originally posted by: hutch622
a reply to: Gryphon66




Hmmm ... we're hanging scarecrows so early? If you'd like me to argue that claim, quote me making it.


I honestly have no idea what that means .


You've made a strawman argument in the post I replied to.

You're claiming that I've said something I didn't say here and haven't said anywhere.

I'm basically saying your argument about Clinton in reply to what I stated is fallacious and farcical.




posted on Sep, 30 2016 @ 09:58 AM
link   

originally posted by: stosh64
a reply to: JetBlackStare


This follows a day of leaks and unnamed sources who report that Trump cannot be counseled to dial it back, refuses to prepare and won't be managed whatsoever.

Say what you will but this is the exact reason many will vote for him.

Many, such as myself are sick to death of robotic puppets lying to us to get elected and then further implementing the real corporate/globalist agenda.

Could Trump be part of the agenda and fooling all his supporters? maybe.

Most of us I believe are holding on to a slim string of hope that he may actually care about and love America.

Les Deplorables - Do You Hear The People Sing?


I totally understand what you are saying. But why does our anti-establishment candidate have to be a bloviating narcissist prone to irrational outburts? And a member of the 1%?

Why can't we get huge amounts of support for someone more hinged, like Ralph Nader or even Bernie? Bernie scared a lot of republicans with his "free college" talk, but I believe he would have stuck it to the TPTB (or at least tried to).

It's because Trump is "Cult of Personality." He's a personification of all the angst people feel. The problem is, that angst doesn't make good decisions if it's wielded by a lunatic.



posted on Sep, 30 2016 @ 09:59 AM
link   
a reply to: Greggers

Perfectly stated.




posted on Sep, 30 2016 @ 10:01 AM
link   
a reply to: Gryphon66

Please feel free to quote where i claimed you said anything .






You know , between the two things above .

OK one thing .
edit on 30-9-2016 by hutch622 because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 30 2016 @ 10:04 AM
link   

originally posted by: Christosterone
Can you imagine if Trump said this?


We don't have to imagine! He has said those things... and worse! No imagination is necessary.



posted on Sep, 30 2016 @ 10:09 AM
link   
a reply to: Christosterone

Trump insults the media and media personalities every day. He literally launched his campaign with attacks on the media. That has been his ENTIRE shtick since day 1. To quote two instances of Bill Clinton being rude while implying that Trump isn't worse is just laughably deluded.



posted on Sep, 30 2016 @ 10:15 AM
link   

originally posted by: jjkenobi

originally posted by: eNumbra
Voting for trump now, he's just so identifiable; I too like to get coked up and stay up all night ranting on Twitter.


Still trying to push the coc aine thing eh? Even though it's well known Trump is avidly against drugs. Sticking with your old well known plan of repeating a lie enough times and hoping low information voters will believe it.


Lol.

How many people who are staunchly anti-drug get caught being hypocrites, anti-gays, anti-corruption.

I'll believe it when he releases the results of a drug test, why should Hillary be held to such high health standards - why the don't already drug test for the presidency I don't know, but maybe, maybe Trumps just got that stamina.


Pulling back my irreverence for a moment, it's a joke. I'm not pushing any propaganda.

Trumps a piece of #.
Hillarys a piece of #.
Johnsons a piece of #.
Stein is forgettable at best.

All their supporters are pathetic. Wake up; systems broken, nobody in this race is your savior. Especially not a man who gets baited into Twitter wars at 3am, half of his #ing supporters are the kind of people to rail on the youth of today for their attachment to social media and yet Trumps ever present need to correct people on the Internet is just fine.



posted on Sep, 30 2016 @ 10:15 AM
link   

originally posted by: hutch622
a reply to: Gryphon66

Please feel free to quote where i claimed you said anything .






You know , between the two things above .

OK one thing .


You seem confused.

You responded to a statement of mine by saying "so, Hillary is a picture of innocence..." etc.

I didn't say that, or anything resembling that, or anything that could be reasonably construed in that way.

THEREFORE, you're either desperately trying to spin what I did say into something else, or you don't have the fortitude to make your own statement without fallaciously implying that it's related to mine.

Does that clear it up?
edit on 30-9-2016 by Gryphon66 because: Noted



new topics

top topics



 
20
<< 1  2    4  5  6 >>

log in

join