It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: ketsuko
originally posted by: CranialSponge
a reply to: ketsuko
That's not what the definitions say.
That's just you reflecting your false logic thought processes (and completely irrelevant analogies) to try to justify your icky feelings towards the subject.
The definition of gender identity in the OP says that it is completely internal. It is your internal experience of your gender.
Meanwhile, your gender expression is your outward expression of gender, or how you physically express gender.
Nothing in either definition says that one is dependent at all on the other. Ergo, it is possible for a person to express one gender while identifying as another in legal terms in Canada.
So please explain to me where I am wrong.
originally posted by: audubon
a reply to: TheFlyOnTheWall
What on earth are you talking about the animal kingdom for ? That's totally illogical; a non-sequitur.
I think you'll find that humans are animals. Or we were last time I checked.
Anyway, I can tell from the appearance of the 'we'll be letting people commit bestiality next!' meme that you're impervious to argument, on this subject at least. It can only be a matter of time before the 'Adam and Steve' line comes out.
I'll leave you to your fearful world in which the human race is being degraded by some governments recognising the fact that homosexuals exist and have human rights. I think society will get along without your input.
I'll leave you to your fearful world in which the human race is being degraded by some governments recognising the fact that homosexuals exist and have human rights.