Clinton rape victim Juanita Broaddrick to Chelsea Clinton:‘Your parents are not good people’

a reply to: Realtruth

Shaking their heads that Donald Trump hired Roger Ailes after he was revealed to be Fox New's own Bill Cosby.

originally posted by: theantediluvian
a reply to: Bloodydagger


Weeks after this alleged incident, Juanita Broadrrick was attending Clinton fundraisers. Not minutes, not hours, not days — WEEKS later.

That's usually what rape victims do. Stay silent, play dumb. The experience was too emotional for them so they don't bring it up to conjure bad memories. So they try to act normal like nothing ever happened and yes, even if that means being around the rapist at times, depending on the woman.

Its a coping mechanism.

Its also why rape victims usually don't "come out" until years/decades later. The mental block they had finally breaks down after so long.

originally posted by: Indigo5

originally posted by: Realtruth
a reply to: Bloodydagger


Where is the feminist movement now?


It's funny how they seem to pick and choose their hero's, and then blindly ignore situations like these.

They are not voting for Bill Clinton...They are voting for Trump or Hillary.

Trump can try and smear Hillary with the infidelities of her husband...But all politics aside? It's losing him women voters, not gaining them. That's just reality.

The reality is that Hillary turned a blind eye to all of it, that is the kicker here.

She's a despicable wife, and mother to have allowed this to go on, it shows her character and judgement on women's rights, and respect for women.

Who in there right mind allows their husband to cheat, lie, commit infidelity, rape, and more, then think they can somehow allow those morals, and ethics to be part of the highest office, in our land?

Either Hillary has very low self esteem to allow all this to have happened, or she just doesn't care about good morals and ethics, and I'm wagering the latter is the answer.

And for the record Trump is right there with Hillary in ethics and morals.

originally posted by: Realtruth

originally posted by: Indigo5

originally posted by: Realtruth
a reply to: Bloodydagger


Where is the feminist movement now?


It's funny how they seem to pick and choose their hero's, and then blindly ignore situations like these.

They are not voting for Bill Clinton...They are voting for Trump or Hillary.

Trump can try and smear Hillary with the infidelities of her husband...But all politics aside? It's losing him women voters, not gaining them. That's just reality.

The reality is that Hillary turned a blind eye to all of it, that is the kicker here.

Yes...terrific strategy in a presidential election...Attack a wife for believing her husband when he was unfaithful.


I am not one to help the GOP...But SERIOUSLY?...The Dems are hoping and praying that Trump goes all-in on this tactic.

It is 100% sure to backfire on him.

She's a despicable wife, and mother to have allowed this to go on, it shows her character and judgement on women's rights, and respect for women.

Something like 30-60% of all marriages involve infidelity ...and that is on the conservative side.
www.truthaboutdeception.com...

He is going to attack a wife that was cheated on...for what? Forgiveness? Believing her husband?..

Every Dem strategist in the world is hoping he goes exactly that route.

originally posted by: Indigo5

Yes...terrific strategy in a presidential election...Attack a wife for believing her husband when he was unfaithful.


I am not one to help the GOP...But SERIOUSLY?...The Dems are hoping and praying that Trump goes all-in on this tactic.

Something like 30-60% of all marriages involve infidelity ...and that is on the conservative side.
www.truthaboutdeception.com...

He is going to attack a wife that was cheated on...for what? Forgiveness? Believing her husband?..

Every Dem strategist in the world is hoping he goes exactly that route.

Trying to justify or ignore this behavior, in any fashion for decades, show's a character flaw, be they a man or woman. The fact the Democrats picked Hillary is beyond my logical, and moral comprehension because I'm a Democrat.

Unfortunately Hillary cannot play a victim role, since she intends to be the leader of the USA. Hillary is absolutely in control, but not for constructive reasons.

The final outcome here are degrees of loss, not winning, because no matter who gets into office we have all lost.

I really wish people would stop defending their side, and take a hard look, at the nearly worthless human beings, that are being put in front of us as leaders, and role models for the USA.

We seem to be collectively trying to pick a side, then defend and polish the turds, even though we all know they stink to high heaven, this type of behavior is considered "Delusional" at best.

a reply to: Realtruth

For clarity...though I enjoy a good debate and lean left of center on most issues...

This bit is pure non-partisan. Polls, panels, strategists agree, and for good reason, that attacking Hillary on the topic of her husbands indiscretions..moves more women voters her way. That is just the socio-political reality of it.

All politics and partisanship aside...this is a losing strategy for Trump.

How many middle-of-the-road conservative women have had a husband that cheated on them, but decided to embrace their Christian values and the institution of marriage and forgive and work through it?
Trump is damning, in a very ugly way, the very women voters who are just barely holding on to the idea of voting for him.

All Hillary has to do is practice handling it well, and honing her message about forgiveness and the institution of marriage into one pointed comeback and she will leave the second debate with a large chunk of conservative women...not Trump loyalists...but the chunk in the middle of conservative women that he is barely holding on to. In general?..Liberal women...file for divorce lickety-split...Conservative women?..they turn to their Christian ideas of the sacred institution of marriage and work through infidelities.

Hillary has laid this trap for him....He might be stupid enough to confuse bait for meat.

Bill Clinton might (n.b.) be a dangerous sexual predator, but Juanita Broaddrick is the last person who we should listen to on that subject.

First she claimed Clinton had raped her. Then she swore an affidavit that he had never laid a finger on her.

See: www.washingtonpost.com...

So either she committed perjury then, and can't be trusted now, or... she was telling the truth in that affidavit.

She's the least credible witnesses against Clintonian wrongdoing ever to have come forward, and for her to lecture their daughter... words fail me. I can only assume she's angling for media approaches with dollar signs in her eyes.

EDIT: Just seen that someone already pointed this out. Apologies for repetition, I didn't spot it on the first pass.

a reply to: audubon

* In 1972, a 22-year-old woman told campus police at Yale University that she was sexually assaulted by Clinton, a law student at the college. No charges were filed, but retired campus policemen contacted by Capitol Hill Blue confirmed the incident.

* In 1974, a female student at the University of Arkansas complained that then-law school instructor Bill Clinton tried to prevent her from leaving his office during a conference. She said he groped her and forced his hand inside her blouse. She complained to her faculty advisor who confronted Clinton, but Clinton claimed the student ”came on” to him. The student left the school shortly after the incident. Reached at her home in Texas, the former student confirmed the incident, but declined to go on the record with her account. Several former students at the University have confirmed the incident in confidential interviews and said there were other reports of Clinton attempting to force himself on female students;

*Broaddrick, a volunteer in Clinton’s gubernatorial campaign, said he raped her in 1978. Mrs. Broaddrick suffered a bruised and torn lip, which she said she suffered when Clinton bit her during the rape;

* From 1978-1980, during Clinton’s first term as governor of Arkansas, state troopers assigned to protect the governor were aware of at least seven complaints from women who said Clinton forced, or attempted to force, himself on them sexually. One retired state trooper said in an interview that the common joke among those assigned to protect Clinton was “who’s next?” One former state trooper said other troopers would often escort women to the governor’s hotel room after political events, often more than one an evening;

* Carolyn Moffet, a legal secretary in Little Rock in 1979, said she met then-governor Clinton at a political fundraiser and shortly thereafter received an invitation to meet the governor in his hotel room. “I was escorted there by a state trooper. When I went in, he was sitting on a couch, wearing only an undershirt. He pointed at his penis and told me to suck it. I told him I didn’t even do that for my boyfriend and he got mad, grabbed my head and shoved it into his lap. I pulled away from him and ran out of the room.”

* Elizabeth Ward, the Miss Arkansas who won the Miss America crown in 1982, told friends she was forced by Clinton to have sex with him shortly after she won her state crown. Last year, Ward, who is now married with the last name of Gracen (from her first marriage), told an interviewer she did have sex with Clinton but said it was consensual. Close friends of Ward, however, say she still maintains privately that Clinton forced himself on her.

* Paula Corbin, an Arkansas state worker, filed a sexual harassment case against Clinton after an encounter in a Little Rock hotel room where the then-governor exposed himself and demanded oral sex. Clinton settled the case with Jones recently with an $850,000 cash payment.

* Sandra Allen James, a former Washington, DC, political fundraiser says Presidential candidate-to-be Clinton invited her to his hotel room during a political trip to the nation’s capital in 1991, pinned her against the wall and stuck his hand up her dress. She says she screamed loud enough for the Arkansas State Trooper stationed outside the hotel suite to bang on the door and ask if everything was all right, at which point Clinton released her and she fled the room. When she reported the incident to her boss, he advised her to keep her mouth shut if she wanted to keep working. Miss James has since married and left Washington. Reached at her home last week, the former Miss James said she later learned that other women suffered the same fate at Clinton’s hands when he was in Washington during his Presidential run.

* Christy Zercher, a flight attendant on Clinton’s leased campaign plane in 1992, says Presidential candidate Clinton exposed himself to her, grabbed her breasts and made explicit remarks about oral sex. A video shot on board the plane by ABC News shows an obviously inebriated Clinton with his hand between another young flight attendant’s legs. Zercher said later in an interview that White House attorney Bruce Lindsey tried to pressure her into not going public about the assault.

* Kathleen Willey, a White House volunteer, reported that Clinton grabbed her, fondled her breast and pressed her hand against his genitals during an Oval Office meeting in November, 1993. Willey, who told her story in a 60 Minutes interview, became a target of a White House-directed smear campaign after she went public.



Read more: www.thepoliticalinsider.com...

they were probably all full of crap huh.

a reply to: network dude

As I said, I was only talking about Broaddrick, who I described as follows: "She's the least credible witnesses against Clintonian wrongdoing ever to have come forward" (sic typo, meant "one of the")

a reply to: network dude

So a couple dozen women were assaulted...

Some people are willing to ignore all obvious evidence.

Cause, when Clinton gets in they will still get their free money.

Well free to them, the rest of us work to pay these free loaders bills.

Clinton rape victim Juanita Broaddrick to Chelsea Clinton:‘Your parents are not good people’

How completely and obscenely nasty is this going to get now that Clinton has wrapped up the election?

I would just like to throw this out there: Just because this is frustrating, does not mean that the human beings involved have to run the entire gamut of human nastiness.

But it looks like they are going to.

So okay.

a reply to: Dan00

now that Clinton has wrapped up the election?

Says who? One debate? I think not.

a reply to: Martin75

It was over before it began.

But yeah, since you mention it: One debate.

You'll look back on this and wonder why you bothered.

originally posted by: Bloodydagger

originally posted by: theantediluvian
a reply to: Bloodydagger


Weeks after this alleged incident, Juanita Broadrrick was attending Clinton fundraisers. Not minutes, not hours, not days — WEEKS later.

That's usually what rape victims do. Stay silent, play dumb. The experience was too emotional for them so they don't bring it up to conjure bad memories. So they try to act normal like nothing ever happened and yes, even if that means being around the rapist at times, depending on the woman.

Its a coping mechanism.

Its also why rape victims usually don't "come out" until years/decades later. The mental block they had finally breaks down after so long.

She I said a liar, which is why even Fox News won't touch it....and they put out plenty of fake conspiracies. So a conspiracy they want touch has got to be obviously crap. If it's So crap they know they will be sued it must be fairly provable...


Question?


What's a fair "penalty" for false rape allegations?

originally posted by: Dan00

Clinton rape victim Juanita Broaddrick to Chelsea Clinton:‘Your parents are not good people’

How completely and obscenely nasty is this going to get now that Clinton has wrapped up the election?

I would just like to throw this out there: Just because this is frustrating, does not mean that the human beings involved have to run the entire gamut of human nastiness.

But it looks like they are going to.

So okay.

Clinton has not wrapped up the election.

originally posted by: whyamIhere
a reply to: network dude

So a couple dozen women were assaulted...

Some people are willing to ignore all obvious evidence.

Cause, when Clinton gets in they will still get their free money.

Well free to them, the rest of us work to pay these free loaders bills.

What?!?!

Wasn't every other chic VERY willing to bang a married man?!?!


Bill was the cheater, make no mistake, but I don't think any of the rest describe it as an assault and Broderick has been so debunked even Fox News won't touch this story....

originally posted by: elementalgrove
a reply to: Bloodydagger

Talk about an understatement!

Criminal psychopathic scrumbag trash would be getting a little bit closer to the truth.


For a nice glimpse into their world, along with the other sick elite...

I recommend Tranceformation of America, by Cathy O'brien

Hear hear...

Ive advised folks read this in its entirety on a few occasions.

Cheers for the link.

All members PLEASE READ.

originally posted by: Urantia1111

originally posted by: elementalgrove
a reply to: Bloodydagger

Talk about an understatement!

Criminal psychopathic scrumbag trash would be getting a little bit closer to the truth.


For a nice glimpse into their world, along with the other sick elite...

I recommend Tranceformation of America, by Cathy O'brien

Hear hear...

Ive advised folks read this in its entirety on a few occasions.

Cheers for the link.

All members PLEASE READ.

What is a fair penalty for falsely accusing some one of rape??

originally posted by: Dan00

Clinton rape victim Juanita Broaddrick to Chelsea Clinton:‘Your parents are not good people’

How completely and obscenely nasty is this going to get now that Clinton has wrapped up the election?

I would just like to throw this out there: Just because this is frustrating, does not mean that the human beings involved have to run the entire gamut of human nastiness.

But it looks like they are going to.

So okay.

LOL, this thing is FAR from over. Anyone who says either candidate has this thing wrapped up obviously hasn't watched past elections/debates.