It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

$18m the Hillary campaign is using to smear Gary Johnson.

page: 1
7

log in

join
share:

posted on Sep, 28 2016 @ 11:09 PM
link   
$18m the Hillary campaign is using to smear Gary Johnson.



What are they afraid of? Gary and Jill taking votes from Hillary maybe.

Hillary Clinton $300m+
Trump $150m+
Gary Johnson $7.9m
Jill Stein $1.9m



edit on 28-9-2016 by John_Rodger_Cornman because: added words


edit on 28-9-2016 by John_Rodger_Cornman because: added words




posted on Sep, 28 2016 @ 11:10 PM
link   
a reply to: John_Rodger_Cornman

Even though I don't completely agree with the 3rd party policies, they should have certainly had a spot on that stage.



posted on Sep, 28 2016 @ 11:14 PM
link   
What are they afraid of? It's called politics buddy, you can't win by staying on the sidelines thinking you got it locked.



posted on Sep, 28 2016 @ 11:16 PM
link   
This is one of few issues I agree with Gary on. Foreign policy.

US Military adventurism is not making America safer, it is not making the world more stable. It is increasing tensions with major world military powers (China and Russia primarily), it is creating Islamic radicals in the middle east, who then use social media to spread their propaganda to create terror cells in the western world.

US Military adventurism has, in actuality, made America much less safe.

Johnson is 100% correct, US foreign policy is horrible.



posted on Sep, 28 2016 @ 11:20 PM
link   
a reply to: Ohanka
*disclaimer: I am a registered Libertarian*

Johnson's knowledge of foreign anything seems to be lacking.
www.abovetopsecret.com...


edit on 9/28/2016 by Phage because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 28 2016 @ 11:32 PM
link   
a reply to: Ohanka


...it is creating Islamic radicals in the middle east



Eh, that's debatable.

It's much more likely the Hadither clerics and scholars are creating radicals in the Middle East.


Edit: not saying the foreign policy helps, because it can create a hostile attitude towards the west... but you've gotta be pretty radical in the first place to want to be a member of the likes of ISIS.
edit on 28-9-2016 by Hazardous1408 because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 28 2016 @ 11:40 PM
link   
a reply to: Phage

That is because he's not a libertarian. He's a burned out globalist liberal who used his governorship to award contracts that lead to him selling his construction company for millions after he resumed control of it upon leaving office. He's done way too many drugs in the years since and it shows. No politician who manages to double spending and triple the state's indebtedness can be considered a libertarian.



posted on Sep, 28 2016 @ 11:49 PM
link   
a reply to: burdman30ott6

I'm not sure what he is.
Well, he's probably a nice enough person.



posted on Sep, 29 2016 @ 12:35 AM
link   

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: burdman30ott6

I'm not sure what he is.
Well, he's probably a nice enough person.


But still an idiot who has 'Aleppo moments'.



posted on Sep, 29 2016 @ 01:27 AM
link   
a reply to: Hazardous1408

The US supports the main source of the Radical clerics. The house of Saud. Not only do they provide resources to radical mosques in the Mideast, they help establish them in Europe, the US and East Asia, particularly in Indonesia and Malaysia. These Saudi-connected mosques are frequently exposed as hotbeds of Islamic Radicalism and provide foreign recruits for Islamic terrorist organisations, including the Islanic State.

I can't help but think if the US Government was as dedicated as it claims to defeating Islamic Radicalism it'd take a stronger stance against this shameful practice.

The Interventions just fuel the already burning fire.



posted on Sep, 29 2016 @ 04:56 AM
link   
Yeah.
I'm not sure how this is even news, honestly.

Gary Johnson seems to be smearing himself enough without anyone else's help.
If it's not Aleppo, it's a complete inability to name a single foreign leader he respects...

He seems utterly vapid.
Sticking his tongue out at reporters doesn't seem to be having the desired effect either.



posted on Sep, 29 2016 @ 04:45 PM
link   
He's doing all that he can to get media attention.

The media is pretty biased against him and for Hillary.



new topics

top topics



 
7

log in

join