Is Hillary Cheating Again?

originally posted by: Maluhia
a reply to: tigertatzen

She has been photographed wearing an earpiece in the past - hence the "conspiracy theories" - usually discussed on a conspiracy site.

She has not been photographed wearing an earpiece.

In this day and age, anything can be disguised as a earpiece/microphone etc.

I would even bet Hillary's camp would use a directional sound system disguised as a camera etc.... the possibilities are limitless.

And we all know the Clinton's are a liars and cheaters, so there is a 100% chance they have cheated Trump.


www.youtube.com...


once a cheater always a cheater!

originally posted by: Maluhia
a reply to: kruphix

Thanks for the insult - was legitimately asking a question. Not a trump supporter, just a Hillary hater - because I'm so smart.

And one more question - did you see the pics of her wearing an earpiece previously?

There was no pics of her wearing an earpiece previously. I was hoping that Hilary would have worn her hair over her ears for the debate. You can just imagine the melt down that would have caused During the Trump/Clinton debate as she turned her head you could see the same thing in her left ear reflecting light. No ear piece but just the inner part of her ear reflecting light. No doubt someone has picked up on the reflection and claimed it to have been an earpiece during the debate? The madness continues!

a reply to: Maluhia

" is hilary cheating AGAIN ? "

^ MY EMPASIS ADDED

oh dear thats a mighty loaded question - watch where you are pointing it - it may just blow your own foot off

it has never been established that mrs clinton was ever " cheating "

further - the replies up thread demolish the premise of nefarious activity during presidential debate one

Pretty sure if she was going to use an earpiece prompt it wouldnt be wired.

mobile.twitter.com...

Watch her podium as the video starts and the sqirrelly guy covering for her by removing the evidence.

Never added link before. Hope it works

Pumping her up with... stay awake ...don't take a header off the stage ... don't have a seizure ... don't cough meds.

originally posted by: Maluhia

What is that bulge and wire which appears to lead upwards, under that pantsuit?

That is her microphone.

Unless you think there were magic microphones involved in the debates?

Please tell me this is a joke.....
It's the battery pack for her wireless microphone.

a reply to: starlitestarbrite

That made her look vibrant and awake and healthy.

Thems some good drugs

a reply to: imitator

She has no reason or need to be fed the answers.
The great thing about preparing as we saw Monday night is that you know what you're going to say .
When you need to be fed answers you wind up sounding much like trump did. All over the place .

Its her colostomy bag.

a reply to: Maluhia

No she has never been photographed wearing an ear piece..

a reply to: Maluhia

No she has never been photographed wearing an ear piece..

originally posted by: Maluhia

What is that bulge and wire which appears to lead upwards, under that pantsuit? Could it lead to an earpiece like the one she was caught wearing previously? I haven't seen any close ups of her ears and she seems to wear her hair over them these days.

Maybe it's a heart recharger? No- you have to have a heart for one of those.

Is there a legit reason for it? Truly wondering.

Snopes.com posted an article in which it stated that the secret earpiece was false. I would like to suggest that perhaps that decision was in error.

First, looking at the picture in question you can see the wire clearly run straight up the middle of her back all the way to her neck line. The wire visible under her garment is fairly large and easily seen, even under heavy fabric as she is wearing. Later in the same article they show a picture of a Lavalier mic set describing it as the same type the candidates wore during the debate. The Lavalier mic set has a 1.5mm diameter wire running from the battery pack to the mic. That is less than 1/16" of an inch. The wire visible on Hillary is very clearly larger than that.

Second, the wire visibly runs straight up the middle of her back all the way to her neckline. A Lavalier mic properly worn would not run up over her shoulder then down to her chest. That would risk the wire being visible at her neck line, especially with the path this wire took. The wire would have turned at her waist, where garments are typically looser, and then clipped to her lapel. The location and visible path to the middle of her neck line on her back clearly indicate this is not the case and that the wire must have run over her shoulder very near the neck line and would have been visible. The absence of the wire at the neck line or coming over her shoulder indicates the wire diverged from that path or terminated.

Any wire that was so clearly visible on her back would have been even more visible on her shoulder where the fabric of her garment is the tightest. The entire weight of the garment is pulled down directly on her shoulders. Any wire coming over her shoulder would have been visible, unlike the straps of a brassiere which tend to push down into the skin and appear level at the top of the shoulder. There is no way the wire from a Lavalier mic could have been pulled that tight coming from the middle of the back of her neck without also being visible at her neck line.

a reply to: Maluhia

It's the top seam of her pants or her wireless mic... Wow you guys are DESPERATE here.

ETA: Correction, it's DEFINITELY her wireless mic.

a reply to: Vroomfondel

Care to point out in the picture where her microphone wire was then?

a reply to: Maluhia

She was wearing gold shell earrings. I know this because her hair wasn't over her ears.

It's her microphone.

originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: Vroomfondel

Care to point out in the picture where her microphone wire was then?

If it was worn properly, it wouldn't be visible. That is why they wear them that way. Think...