It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Hillary Had A Secret Wireless Ear Bud feeding her information 2016 DEBATE

page: 2
13
<< 1    3 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Sep, 27 2016 @ 03:58 PM
link   
a reply to: ghostrager

You're quite likely correct.




posted on Sep, 27 2016 @ 03:58 PM
link   

originally posted by: ghostrager
a reply to: jadedANDcynical

While I wouldn't put it past Hillary to have an earpiece, that's not what that was. Both Trump and Hillary were wearing microphones.



Only, Trump's was defective.



posted on Sep, 27 2016 @ 03:59 PM
link   

originally posted by: Cobaltic1978
It's hidden by her hair...


I looked several times but am not seeing anything.



posted on Sep, 27 2016 @ 03:59 PM
link   

originally posted by: Sremmos80
a reply to: jadedANDcynical

Or wired for a mic?

Of course this is getting traction tho, wild speculation is king!


Can we see that same thing on Trump? You'd think they'd both be properly mic'd up, right? Maybe we can see if any shots show creases like that in Trumps suit



posted on Sep, 27 2016 @ 04:00 PM
link   

originally posted by: FamCore
a reply to: jadedANDcynical

looks pretty convincing to me. Is there a rule against such a device being used in the debate?


from what i recall the rules werent clear and someone a journalist i believe had requested clarification from the commision but they didnt reply back with clarification but rather a canned response.
edit on 01930America/ChicagoTue, 27 Sep 2016 16:01:28 -0500000000p3042 by interupt42 because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 27 2016 @ 04:02 PM
link   

originally posted by: Whereismypassword
a reply to: jadedANDcynical

Where does that image come from?

Googling images of Clinton at the debate shows Trump patting her on the back and there doesn't seem to be anything there



He was patting her down, he didn't find anything. Besides if she did have an earpiece in, she wouldn't be wearing 1990's technology, she would be utilising the tiniest of digital technology. Or she may be a robot.



posted on Sep, 27 2016 @ 04:06 PM
link   
a reply to: Cobaltic1978

Lol yeah he patted her down,wisest thing he has done!

Would like to know where that image came from,I know she is leant over so her clothes are digging in tight over her body but in the shot with trump patting her we should see a line going up her top spine above the bra strap if the image posted was true



posted on Sep, 27 2016 @ 04:07 PM
link   

originally posted by: Whereismypassword
Would like to know where that image came from,I know she is leant over so her clothes are digging in tight over her body but in the shot with trump patting her we should see a line going up her top spine above the bra strap if the image posted was true


Why would it not be true? They are both wearing wireless microphones.



posted on Sep, 27 2016 @ 04:12 PM
link   

originally posted by: Whereismypassword
a reply to: Cobaltic1978

Lol yeah he patted her down,wisest thing he has done!

Would like to know where that image came from,I know she is leant over so her clothes are digging in tight over her body but in the shot with trump patting her we should see a line going up her top spine above the bra strap if the image posted was true



Hillary's spine and bra strap isn't an image I want to conjure up to be perfectly honest.



posted on Sep, 27 2016 @ 04:14 PM
link   
You do realize both candidates would be wearing mics. It's not an ear piece it's a microphone they always wire the candidates before a debate.



posted on Sep, 27 2016 @ 04:15 PM
link   
a reply to: AugustusMasonicus


They don't have to wear the receiver for their microphone

Saw a reporter on sky take off the microphone from someone outside this debate as he had to get inside the building,she didn't have to take off a receiver as he wasn't wearing one



posted on Sep, 27 2016 @ 04:16 PM
link   
a reply to: Stevemagegod

Did Trump have one as well with some racist xenophobic megalomaniac feeding him, couth, couth, information?

Or was it just the voices in his head?



posted on Sep, 27 2016 @ 04:16 PM
link   
All I seem to be seeing is pixelated ear. Plus a lot of projected rubbish.



posted on Sep, 27 2016 @ 04:18 PM
link   

originally posted by: jadedANDcynical
a reply to: Stevemagegod

You hush, it's just a wrinkle in her jacket



Has anybody noticed that the title of this thread reads wireless. Yet this picture is presented, and gets tons of stars.

We are doomed.
edit on 27/9/16 by Cobaltic1978 because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 27 2016 @ 04:18 PM
link   
a reply to: Stevemagegod

She was wearing Red last night.



posted on Sep, 27 2016 @ 04:19 PM
link   

originally posted by: Whereismypassword
They don't have to wear the receiver for their microphone

Saw a reporter on sky take off the microphone from someone outside this debate as he had to get inside the building,she didn't have to take off a receiver as he wasn't wearing one


You certainly do. I suppose you have never been mic'd up, you need to wear a wireless transmitter attached to the microphone, the one they are wearing appears to be a standard item.



posted on Sep, 27 2016 @ 04:28 PM
link   

originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus

originally posted by: Whereismypassword
They don't have to wear the receiver for their microphone

Saw a reporter on sky take off the microphone from someone outside this debate as he had to get inside the building,she didn't have to take off a receiver as he wasn't wearing one


You certainly do. I suppose you have never been mic'd up, you need to wear a wireless transmitter attached to the microphone, the one they are wearing appears to be a standard item.


I have and when I wear them, I like to think I have control of the supermarket queues, cntrolling the lengths of each one of them, ensuring that my OCD is used effectively for my Global Masters. I know, I'm absolutely mad.

But, at least I'm not a Mason



posted on Sep, 27 2016 @ 04:30 PM
link   

originally posted by: Cobaltic1978
But, at least I'm not a Mason


More succulent infant for me.



posted on Sep, 27 2016 @ 04:32 PM
link   
a reply to: AugustusMasonicus

I've heard it's real good mister, is it? Is it?



posted on Sep, 27 2016 @ 04:35 PM
link   

originally posted by: Cobaltic1978

originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus

originally posted by: Whereismypassword
They don't have to wear the receiver for their microphone

Saw a reporter on sky take off the microphone from someone outside this debate as he had to get inside the building,she didn't have to take off a receiver as he wasn't wearing one


You certainly do. I suppose you have never been mic'd up, you need to wear a wireless transmitter attached to the microphone, the one they are wearing appears to be a standard item.


I have and when I wear them, I like to think I have control of the supermarket queues, cntrolling the lengths of each one of them, ensuring that my OCD is used effectively for my Global Masters. I know, I'm absolutely mad.

But, at least I'm not a Mason


Sir my Grandfather was a Master Mason. We still have his Ceremonial Sword.



new topics

top topics



 
13
<< 1    3 >>

log in

join