It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Help ATS via PayPal:
learn more

Don't listen to the liberal MSM: Trump crushed Hillary at the debates.

page: 9
72
<< 6  7  8    10  11  12 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Sep, 27 2016 @ 02:44 PM
link   

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: Bloodydagger

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: Bloodydagger

originally posted by: intrepid
Back in the real world.... Trump was trounced. Poll your polls if they help you sleep at night. The fact remains that he failed miserably.


^One mans opinion here. For everyone who says he failed miserably, I bet you can find others (in the real world as you say there) who say otherwise.


You are correct, but how many of those opinions are based on the actual performance of the people on stage, or is skewed by their political partisanship?

Based on their performance, Trump lost badly.




And how many people hate Hillary enough to not care how Trump did? Something else to consider ~


True. It's sad that people would hate someone so much that they would deny reality and what actually happened on that stage.

They hate Hillary...therefore Trump wins.



Hillary is probably the most hated person in America. Just a cursory bit of research, and you understand why. So, yes. I'm sure there are those that would vote for Freddy Krueger before they would vote for her.




posted on Sep, 27 2016 @ 02:46 PM
link   

originally posted by: introvert
Oh, how salty some are when licking their own wounds.

I thought Trump had this in the bag and all he had to do was show-up in order to be victorious.

But he came, he saw and left with his ass in hand.

Trump lost that debate. Period.


First off, can we say ass on here? Watch out people, I got a new word to play with!

But seriously, I thought Trump lost. But I didn't think it was a crushing defeat. I doubt many people were swayed in who to vote for.

Having said that, I am currently probably still in the Trump camp. However, if he doesn't improve on this performance in the next two debates, I will probably end up voting for Johnson.



posted on Sep, 27 2016 @ 02:46 PM
link   

originally posted by: Bloodydagger

originally posted by: imjack
a reply to: Bloodydagger

I'm now certain based on the conversation direction you just don't understand computers.

You're confusing 'needing to hack' with 'not needing to hack'.

What part of it's their own default system don't you understand?

Yes it's susceptible, do they care? No. Why? It's a gag.

Facing the truth that most polls are incorrect is just a truth to face.


You're the one who said these websites wont care if they are hacked, not me. If they were hacked, believe me, they'd care and we'd know it by now.


You're twisting the argument with no understanding of the actual hack. You keep claiming these websites would 'know' and it's a local machine operation. The ignorance is astounding. Mostly because there is almost no proof you have ADDITIONALLY if the poll was hacked NON-LOCALLY, in OTHERWORDS, you're only defending half the argument and you're using your infallible opinion as proof of it. You have no flipping idea if they would know if they were hacked and your lone argument is probably that they're rich, even though the f###ing Pentagon and Military systems are hacked EASILY each day.
edit on 27-9-2016 by imjack because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 27 2016 @ 02:47 PM
link   

originally posted by: imitator
To be honest Hillary look like she was gonna cry like a little girl..... Trump whipped her good, and he was just pointing his finger at her for being naughty.



??????????????????????
What the hell did you watch? Because it sure as hell wasn't what I saw!



posted on Sep, 27 2016 @ 02:47 PM
link   

originally posted by: queenofswords

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: Bloodydagger

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: Bloodydagger

originally posted by: intrepid
Back in the real world.... Trump was trounced. Poll your polls if they help you sleep at night. The fact remains that he failed miserably.


^One mans opinion here. For everyone who says he failed miserably, I bet you can find others (in the real world as you say there) who say otherwise.


You are correct, but how many of those opinions are based on the actual performance of the people on stage, or is skewed by their political partisanship?

Based on their performance, Trump lost badly.




And how many people hate Hillary enough to not care how Trump did? Something else to consider ~


True. It's sad that people would hate someone so much that they would deny reality and what actually happened on that stage.

They hate Hillary...therefore Trump wins.



Hillary is probably the most hated person in America. Just a cursory bit of research, and you understand why. So, yes. I'm sure there are those that would vote for Freddy Krueger before they would vote for her.


I went even farther in another thread. I said they would probably vote for Bill Cosby before Hillary.



posted on Sep, 27 2016 @ 02:48 PM
link   

originally posted by: imjack

originally posted by: Bloodydagger

originally posted by: imjack
a reply to: Bloodydagger

I'm now certain based on the conversation direction you just don't understand computers.

You're confusing 'needing to hack' with 'not needing to hack'.

What part of it's their own default system don't you understand?

Yes it's susceptible, do they care? No. Why? It's a gag.

Facing the truth that most polls are incorrect is just a truth to face.


You're the one who said these websites wont care if they are hacked, not me. If they were hacked, believe me, they'd care and we'd know it by now.


the f###ing Pentagon and Military systems are hacked EASILY each day.


Yet we usually hear about those when they get hacked.



posted on Sep, 27 2016 @ 02:50 PM
link   

originally posted by: Sremmos80
a reply to: DBCowboy

My bet is there isn't anything should could say that would sway you, you have been pretty adamant about your feelings, which I am not saying you shouldn't have, towards Hillary.


That's how I would judge a debate. Who convinces me?

Isn't that the objective of any debate?



posted on Sep, 27 2016 @ 02:51 PM
link   
a reply to: Bloodydagger

Yeah. MONTHS AFTER, normally in a LEAK.

Are you kidding me?

Are you saying MSM should be more ontop of their systems than the PENTAGON?

The truth is you don't understand computers and that computer security in general is just an inferior thought.

There is always a 'backdoor'. They cannot be designed to be 'completely unhackable' within any reasonable measure.



posted on Sep, 27 2016 @ 02:52 PM
link   
a reply to: DBCowboy

Yes, but I just think some people are playing coy her and acting like there was a chance for their mind to be changed.

I know there is very little Trump could say for me to change my mind.
Just like very little Hillary could say.



posted on Sep, 27 2016 @ 02:52 PM
link   
a reply to: imjack

We'd know of it by now. People cite things to fit their narrative. Its all there is to it.
edit on 27-9-2016 by Bloodydagger because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 27 2016 @ 02:54 PM
link   

originally posted by: Bloodydagger
a reply to: imjack

We'd know of it by now. People cite things to fit their narrative. Its all there is to it.


People do KNOW OF IT.

You are CITING YOUR NARRATIVE right now by claiming it's 'something that would be known about' as disinformation.

Who the **** are you to be the authoritarian narrative of what people know about it?
edit on 27-9-2016 by imjack because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 27 2016 @ 02:54 PM
link   
a reply to: queenofswords

Most hated person in America?

Maybe in the right wing echo chambers, and the flip is true for Trump, but hardly as a fact of the matter.

I personally have my hatred saved for Jed York.



posted on Sep, 27 2016 @ 02:55 PM
link   

originally posted by: imjack

originally posted by: Bloodydagger
a reply to: imjack

We'd know of it by now. People cite things to fit their narrative. Its all there is to it.


People do KNOW OF IT.



Then show me proof that it happened.



posted on Sep, 27 2016 @ 02:55 PM
link   
a reply to: Sremmos80

I wish there was someone who could convince to TO vote for someone versus someone who convinces me to vote for anyone else.



posted on Sep, 27 2016 @ 02:56 PM
link   

originally posted by: Sremmos80
I personally have my hatred saved for Jed York.


Yeah. Where's Eddie when you need him.


As to this I have a theory. Damage control.



posted on Sep, 27 2016 @ 02:56 PM
link   
a reply to: DBCowboy

We can agree there, so let's drop the act that Hillary has a chance of being that person.



posted on Sep, 27 2016 @ 03:00 PM
link   

originally posted by: Bloodydagger

Oh sure. Lets trust the word of the 4Chan /b/ script kiddies. They are attention whores who crave attention.


Um... that's sort of the whole point of the article.



posted on Sep, 27 2016 @ 03:02 PM
link   
a reply to: Bloodydagger

Someone show Bloody step by step how to double vote. He still can't grasp the concept that it's possible to do on a computer, and not get caught. It's not even 'illegal' to vote twice. You just literally don't understand internet polls, despite being so passionate about this impossibility.

I'm sure you can log onto Facebook, vote for Trump, create a new Facebook account, Vote for Trump, and discover this phenomenon quite easily.

"But Jack! Creating a new Facebook account would take so much time! I can't do that!"

Yeah I know. It's rough being a corrupt voter. but here is the kicker: The point is in many polls, an account is not even required, so you are able to vote by simply loading the page. You could rack 30 votes a minute with this strategy if done correctly. There is no way to catch the person, as it treats each vote as a new loaded traffic vote.It's not even intended to catch people doing this. That's a fact.


My point was ASIDE THAT- it's STILL ALSO, completely POSSIBLE- They were hacked, They did not discover this, The poll was massively changed unaware to them, by a single individual too.
edit on 27-9-2016 by imjack because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 27 2016 @ 03:04 PM
link   

originally posted by: Bloodydagger

originally posted by: imjack

originally posted by: Bloodydagger
a reply to: imjack

We'd know of it by now. People cite things to fit their narrative. Its all there is to it.


People do KNOW OF IT.



Then show me proof that it happened.


2 people showed you proof of the 4chan trolls doing their Trumping.


You're just an ignoramus.



posted on Sep, 27 2016 @ 03:04 PM
link   

originally posted by: Bloodydagger
a reply to: imjack

We'd know of it by now. People cite things to fit their narrative. Its all there is to it.


We do know of it. I posted a link to an article about a bunch of computer nerds HACKING the online polls. You obviously didn't read it, or didn't understand it.



new topics

top topics



 
72
<< 6  7  8    10  11  12 >>

log in

join