Keith Lamont Scott's wife about Keith - "He's a killer and they should know that"

a reply to: windword

People don't just walk around with an empty holster as an accessory item...

a reply to: Cypress

So an empty ankle holster is reason to shoot and kill a person? Felons don't usually walk around with an ankle holster wrapped around the outside of their pants, advertising their stolen weapon, either.

How many times have you watched an episode of "Law and Order", where the perp or informant that was corner drug dealer who would put his leg up on a stoop, or bus bench, to pull drugs from his ankle stash?

In an open carry state an old ankle holster is the perfect place to keep one's stash, rolling papers or pipe, a lighter and one's legal prescription paper. We know he had a stash, rolling papers and lighter, because he rolled and was smoking a "blunt". We don't have any evidence that he was in possession of a weapon other than the word of the police officers, one of which "forgot" to turn his body cam on 'til after the shooting.

a reply to: windword

The police produced pictures of the gun and holster which had his fingerprints. Where's the medical proof of this so called debilitating brain injury? Why was he driving? Where was his cane?

I look at every incident individually. This is one where the police are justified, not that he deserved to die by any means. There was another shooting where the cop was indicted within 2 days. There was another where the cops shot a man and his 6 year old son. Never heard of that ine? Probably bc they were white. This is all manufactured outraged that is politically motivated.

a reply to: mkultra11

The police produced a picture of Keith Scott wearing an ankle holster. They did not produce a picture of Keith Scott holding a gun, not did they produce the pictures of the gun being recovered. We get a picture of a gun, after the fact, and are told to believe that it's the same gun the officers said they saw from inside their car, through the tinted windows of Mr Scott's car, before they surprised him and ordered him out of the car at gun point.

In fact, we have a picture of a man with his hands, which the one we can see, his right hand, appears to be empty, limp at his sides. I contend the gun was planted when they realized that an unarmed had just been shot, and you can see exactly when and how it happened, as I posted earlier in this thread. Finger prints and DNA are easy when you have control over a crime scene and the body.

Why was he driving?

Was he driving? Do you evidence that he was driving? Even if he did drive from one end of the parking lot to the other, so what? Lot's of people drive and then get into their motorized scooters.

This isn't about race, it's about police misconduct and corruption, as I've stated earlier in this thread.

a reply to: Vasa Croe

WASHINGTON, DC — A disturbing confession by John Elliot, a former Fairfax County police officer, illustrates exactly what happens when cops try to get away with murdering American citizens. Recall all of the cases you’ve heard of officers shooting someone and moments later conveniently “finding a gun” near the dead person’s body.

In these cases, the victim’s family will typically come forward and state that their dead loved one never had a gun and, in fact, never even owned any guns or knew how to use them. But once the story of a gun being “found” on the victim is promulgated by the mainstream media, the family’s testimony gets drowned out. How is it that these guns (sometimes knives) keep showing up on people after being shot by police?

The answer: throw-away weapons.

filmingcops.com...

originally posted by: windword
a reply to: Vasa Croe

WASHINGTON, DC — A disturbing confession by John Elliot, a former Fairfax County police officer, illustrates exactly what happens when cops try to get away with murdering American citizens. Recall all of the cases you’ve heard of officers shooting someone and moments later conveniently “finding a gun” near the dead person’s body.

In these cases, the victim’s family will typically come forward and state that their dead loved one never had a gun and, in fact, never even owned any guns or knew how to use them. But once the story of a gun being “found” on the victim is promulgated by the mainstream media, the family’s testimony gets drowned out. How is it that these guns (sometimes knives) keep showing up on people after being shot by police?

The answer: throw-away weapons.

filmingcops.com...

Except for the fact that he had owned guns and had committed crimes with them and his own wife said he had an illegal gun when she filed for a restraining order against him because he beat her and her kids and threatened them with the gun he had...but yeah...this time he just had a holster....

[snip]

a reply to: Vasa Croe

At the time, the police were informed that he was NOT armed, and that he didn't have a weapon. Just like the guy in El Cajon, San Diego. Cops were informed that he was unarmed. They didn't care. The difference is, the El Cajon cops didn't plant a weapon to cover their error. Plus, they were able to provide a scary picture of a threatening dude. Charlotte can't do that.

Keith Scott's past stopped being relevant to this incident in November 2015.

originally posted by: windword
a reply to: Vasa Croe

At the time, the police were informed that he was NOT armed, and that he didn't have a weapon. Just like the guy in El Cajon, San Diego. Cops were informed that he was unarmed. They didn't care. The difference is, the El Cajon cops didn't plant a weapon to cover their error. Plus, they were able to provide a scary picture of a threatening dude. Charlotte can't do that.

Keith Scott's past stopped being relevant to this incident in November 2015.

Informed by who? A random lady running out well after the undercovers had seen the gun, left and came back with vests to confront a guy with a gun smoking weed at a school bus stop?

And it's funny you haven't refuted their claim to smoking weed and rolling a joint because he did that in the car too...you know...the one with the tinted windows you harp on...or was that made up and planted as well?

a reply to: Vasa Croe

yea it's obvious, keeps on pulling.... well you know

a reply to: Vasa Croe

Random lady? They saw her leave! They knew who she was. They didn't do their due diligence here. They murdered a non-threatening disabled man, whose hands were hanging limp at his side, because they saw him smoking a joint. They manufactured an excuse to harass him. Things didn't go well for them, and they had to plant a drop gun.

originally posted by: windword
a reply to: Vasa Croe

Random lady? They saw her leave! They knew who she was. They didn't do their due diligence here. They murdered a non-threatening disabled man, whose hands were hanging limp at his side, because they saw him smoking a joint. They manufactured an excuse to harass him. Things didn't go well for them, and they had to plant a drop gun.

They saw her leave? Her house? Seriously? And you think they knew who she was? And you've been harping on the fact they hado no idea who he was until after this whole time, but now they know who she was?

And you just admitted they saw him smoking a joint. So they saw that through the the tinted windows because he clearly wasn't smoking a joint when he got out. They saw him smoking a joint but maybe the windows were electronic tint and he tinted them darker when he held the gun....is that what happened?

[snip]

a reply to: Vasa Croe

Especially with a large opening at the grip end and another at the muzzle end....I am SURE your stash will stay in that and not fall out!

to add emphases

originally posted by: hounddoghowlie
a reply to: Vasa Croe

Especially with a large opening at the grip end and another at the muzzle end....I am SURE your stash will stay in that and not fall out!

to add emphases

Yep...that's where I would hide my stash....no chance of that falling out.

Not to mention the point that hiding a stash in a gun holster on your ankle makes no sense. Like that won't get searched...may as well be in your damn pocket or tucked in your tighties....

a reply to: Vasa Croe

Windword is a troll...

You're the one saying that Mrs Scott plotted the event to either set her husband up or have him murdered. Who's trolling?

So, the police murdered Keith Scott for his wife? How'd they arrange for that, again?

So, his wife told the truth when she told the cops that her husband had a gun, last year when she filed a domestic violence complaint, but she lied to them the day he died, telling them he was UNARMED? Why? If she wanted him dead, she'd tell them he WAS armed.

You be careful, you're going to pull a muscle with all the mental gymnastics it takes to defend your case!

originally posted by: hounddoghowlie
a reply to: Vasa Croe

Especially with a large opening at the grip end and another at the muzzle end....I am SURE your stash will stay in that and not fall out!

to add emphases

Oh...and the way the leather strap has naturally formed a bend there doesn't suggest it's been snugged up to a grip on a gun or anything either....maybe a long pipe right?

a reply to: Vasa Croe

i was thinking the bowl stem on a bong, and the rest coming out the bottom .
have bong will travel.

originally posted by: hounddoghowlie
a reply to: Vasa Croe

Especially with a large opening at the grip end and another at the muzzle end....I am SURE your stash will stay in that and not fall out!

to add emphases

Looks perfect!