It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Help ATS via PayPal:
learn more

Where is the wikileaks damning information on HC

page: 1
9
<<   2 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Sep, 26 2016 @ 06:34 PM
link   
Serously where is the info on hillary Clinton he said he had and was set to release before the debate? Wikileaks has 1 hour hand 30 minutes till the debate.

Has something happened?
Is google blocking it?

What do you think?




posted on Sep, 26 2016 @ 06:35 PM
link   
a reply to: digital01anarchy

Assange probably realized that it won't matter either way.
edit on 26-9-2016 by Atsbhct because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 26 2016 @ 06:37 PM
link   

originally posted by: Atsbhct
a reply to: digital01anarchy

Assange probably realized that it won't matter either way.


Did he sell out americans for the prisoner exchange?
edit on 26-9-2016 by digital01anarchy because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 26 2016 @ 06:37 PM
link   
a reply to: digital01anarchy

All I know is enough came out about how her and the dnc treated Bernie to not get my vote. I wish there was someone besides these tow to vote for. It is so depressing.



posted on Sep, 26 2016 @ 06:38 PM
link   
I have been wondering the same thing all day. I am trying to find a post that was on Reddit where the person posting had a theory that the leaks, in part, will be released to Mr. Trump first and then to the general public shortly thereafter. The post was far more detailed than my explanation here. I will find it and return with a link. That would be an interesting turn of events.



posted on Sep, 26 2016 @ 06:41 PM
link   
a reply to: digital01anarchy

I really don't know.



posted on Sep, 26 2016 @ 06:42 PM
link   
I'm hearing Trump is going to announce new found info tonight on live TV !!




posted on Sep, 26 2016 @ 06:44 PM
link   

originally posted by: digital01anarchy
Serously where is the info on hillary Clinton he said he had and was set to release before the debate? Wikileaks has 1 hour hand 30 minutes till the debate.

Has something happened?
Is google blocking it?

What do you think?


OMG...not sure how many threads I have to post this on...the interview that the quote was associated to is complete and online. It is the only interview that Afshin Rattansi has done with Assange. The quote being attributed to Assange was NEVER said.

It is a made up quote that someone posted assuming correctly that nobody would actually watch the video of the interview to realize the quote is BS.

Assange never said it...



posted on Sep, 26 2016 @ 06:44 PM
link   

originally posted by: OrderOfIntent
I have been wondering the same thing all day. I am trying to find a post that was on Reddit where the person posting had a theory that the leaks, in part, will be released to Mr. Trump first and then to the general public shortly thereafter. The post was far more detailed than my explanation here. I will find it and return with a link. That would be an interesting turn of events.


Seems dangerous! To run with info the public hasnt been informed of let. Something seems off about this



posted on Sep, 26 2016 @ 06:47 PM
link   

originally posted by: digital01anarchy
Serously where is the info on hillary Clinton he said he had and was set to release before the debate? Wikileaks has 1 hour hand 30 minutes till the debate.

Has something happened?
Is google blocking it?

What do you think?


Agreed, it needs to be released if it is useful and provides critical information.



posted on Sep, 26 2016 @ 06:49 PM
link   

originally posted by: digital01anarchy
Serously where is the info on hillary Clinton he said he had and was set to release before the debate? Wikileaks has 1 hour hand 30 minutes till the debate.

Has something happened?
Is google blocking it?

What do you think?


Assange was lying. He just wanted attention because everyone's forgotten about him and nobody cares.
edit on 26/9/2016 by MongolianPaellaFish because: fixed typo...


+2 more 
posted on Sep, 26 2016 @ 06:52 PM
link   

originally posted by: MongolianPaellaFish

originally posted by: digital01anarchy
Serously where is the info on hillary Clinton he said he had and was set to release before the debate? Wikileaks has 1 hour hand 30 minutes till the debate.

Has something happened?
Is google blocking it?

What do you think?


Assange was bluffing. He just wanted attention because everyone's forgotten about him and nobody cares.


Seriously...you again? Continuing to promote disinfo? It's obvious you signed up at ATS for this purpose by your posts.

Promoting ignorance.

The quote being attributed to Assange was NEVER said.

I am truly dumbfounded at the amount of ignorance I am seeing on ATS threads about this quote when it can be easily debunked by actually watching the interview....sad that this is even being debated and the threads on this aren't Hoax binned.



posted on Sep, 26 2016 @ 06:54 PM
link   
a reply to: MongolianPaellaFish

I'm pretty sure he was talking about her using a private server to send classified documents on. If she wasn't who she is she would be put in prison for that.

I guess he hasn't realized how this country is.



posted on Sep, 26 2016 @ 06:56 PM
link   
a reply to: digital01anarchy

I also agree with your opinion on that. I just read it and it [the theory], at the very least, was interesting. The post included a brief explanation about how Mr. Trump would not be letting the viewers know that he had the info BUT he would definitely be using it as part of his speculative arsenal. I think the theory is that he would call her out on some things that he knew would be revealed soon after the debate. This would certainly make him appear "smarter" and it would pin her to more of her lies. Like I said, interesting to think about. I guess that only time will tell.



posted on Sep, 26 2016 @ 06:56 PM
link   

originally posted by: MongolianPaellaFish

originally posted by: digital01anarchy
Serously where is the info on hillary Clinton he said he had and was set to release before the debate? Wikileaks has 1 hour hand 30 minutes till the debate.

Has something happened?
Is google blocking it?

What do you think?


Assange was lying. He just wanted attention because everyone's forgotten about him and nobody cares.


Please refer to the post 3 above yours. Explains it all in a clear , concise fashion . Then your question becomes moot.



posted on Sep, 26 2016 @ 06:56 PM
link   
Disappointing. I think most of us thought he would release something or there was something coming. I guess that's what I get for relying on second hand information! LOL I'll admit it, I was an idiot. There's a reason I'm not a journalist. but I sooo wanted something from Assange today! AAAARRRGG!



posted on Sep, 26 2016 @ 07:00 PM
link   
Maybe Julian decided that poking an angry bear (the angry bear being the US government) with a pointy stick wasn't in his best interest.

Dudes already been hauled up in the Ecuador embassy for the last 4 years avoiding trumped up rape charges. He probably just came to his senses and realized he has enough problems, without running his mouth off and creating more.

But that's just pure conjecture on my part.



posted on Sep, 26 2016 @ 07:01 PM
link   

originally posted by: Vasa Croe

originally posted by: MongolianPaellaFish

originally posted by: digital01anarchy
Serously where is the info on hillary Clinton he said he had and was set to release before the debate? Wikileaks has 1 hour hand 30 minutes till the debate.

Has something happened?
Is google blocking it?

What do you think?


Assange was bluffing. He just wanted attention because everyone's forgotten about him and nobody cares.


I am truly dumbfounded at the amount of ignorance I am seeing on ATS threads about this quote when it can be easily debunked by actually watching the interview....sad that this is even being debated and the threads on this aren't Hoax binned.


THIS^^^^^^^

PAY ATTENTION. The quote is FAKE.

Listen to the entire video and you will realize Assange NEVER SAID IT.



posted on Sep, 26 2016 @ 07:05 PM
link   
a reply to: digital01anarchy

It was fictitious...all along...



posted on Sep, 26 2016 @ 07:07 PM
link   
a reply to: digital01anarchy

The truth is, that Wikileaks didn't have anything "big" as they continued to claim it to release in time for the debates. I think the last few years Wikileaks (Which should never have had a face by the way. It was far more powerful when we didn't know who was behind it) has become just another publicity seeking company. I know yes they release a ton of hacked information, and emails and bring things to light that we would never have seen or known but the fact remains that they are or at least Julian has become a publicity hound.

I have to wonder if he'd have come forward and shown who his face if it wasn't for the fake rape case against him, a clear attempt to get Sweden to give him to the States we would never have known who he was and Wikileaks would've been a much better and scarier (for politicians and their ilk) entity.




top topics



 
9
<<   2 >>

log in

join