Quantum Entanglement shows the universe is a vast simulation

a reply to: neoholographic

I think i understand what you are saying but I have heard it another way.

When the Universe was the singularity.........a compact baseball size mass, all the particles were entangled and were in instant communication with one another........so the illusion is as the Universe expanded the instantaneous communication ceased which is not correct as all the particles are still entangled just the distance changed.

After thinking about this I came to the conclusion that it actually explains spooky action at a distance involving quantam physics.

a reply to: southbeach

a compact baseball size mass, all the particles were entangled

Then you misunderstand. Until a while after inflation "began" there were no particles.

a reply to: Phage

I misunderstand nothing my merry friend.
It is a theory I have heard that makes sense.

Unless you were sat there when the Universe was formed you cannot say with an authoritarian narrative that others do not understand and you do ...all are theories and theories constantly change.

a reply to: southbeach

Let me clarify.

You misapprehend the "big bang theory." Clearly.

a reply to: LetsGoViking


How true! Glug glug! Nothing is real, its all made of lucid dream stuff.So what is a lucid dream made of? personal interperation of information,which has already been eternally entangled, and exists in the same state that the photon exists in. To prove it, you can ask, "Where does the light come from in dreams?"

a reply to: anonentity

Nothing is real,

Strawberry fields...

forever.


You are such a cliche.

a reply to: Phage


"I'd rather be a cliche than a nail, yes I would, if i surely could"

a reply to: anonentity

Huh?

I'm afraid I missed the reference and/or relevance.

Please clarify.

a reply to: Phage


1:34


The relevance is that the moon landing was fake.

a reply to: imjack

The relevance is that the moon landing was fake.

False.
Neither factual or relevant.

originally posted by: Cobaltic1978
It's funny isn't it, that after we developed simulation, claims that the universe is a simulation, are made.

This is just another claim, made of its time.

These claims did not develop after we developed simulation, the notion has been around since way before that.

a reply to: Phage

Dang. I still don't understand the cliche part either.

You know, if this really is a simulation, it's probably a simulation of a simulation.

a reply to: Phage


Well.. where does the light come from when you dream?. Or when you internaly visulise anything.All I am suggesting is that the " mind", is in the same place as the percieved state of the photon , where linear time is a necesary mental contruct, for negating the chaos of infinite information overload. In the double slit experiment,given the time state of the photon, the fact that the wave appears to collapse, is not possible.Because the photon does not exist in our interpretation of linear time.Therefore the collapse is an illusion.Along with everthing else.

a reply to: Phage

You are such a cliche.

So are you Phage, so are you.

a reply to: imjack

Yeah. Well.
If you seek the answers to questions in cartoons, you're on your own.

I like Teen Titans Go!, myself.

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: imjack

Yeah. Well.
If you seek the answers to questions in cartoons, you're on your own.

I like Teen Titans Go!, myself.

I'm not saying it's likely we're in a simulation. Or that I derive that from cartoons.

I'm saying that if we were in a simulation, that's probably in a simulation itself.

Also even with the much improved new seasons of Teen Titans Go!, everyone with taste prefers the original Teen Titans, so....

a reply to: imjack

Truth be told, I still prefer Bugs.
But, alas, Mel is no more.

a reply to: neoholographic

secrets hidden in the chemistry that surrounds us.

Nothing is hidden. We know everything. bingo bango....

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: southbeach

a compact baseball size mass, all the particles were entangled

Then you misunderstand. Until a while after inflation "began" there were no particles.

You are just theorising here Phage, it is not known and there is no consensus.

a reply to: VanDenEviL

Do you know the difference between a theory and a hypothesis?

In any case, the theory is not mine. But the available evidence does support it. Elsewise, it wouldn't be much of a theory.