It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Nice job of copying and pasting...sorry it took me so long to reply, I was lost in reading. Just kidding I am not about to read through an entire re posting of someone else's re posting...etc etc.
As most you are just repeating what you have heard and have not actually put your eyes on the texts themselves. Just as an example and because it stood out since a false belief states they are a "religion of peace" but do kill unbelievers.
"Kill nonbelievers. (2 Chronicles 15:12-13)" If you picked up a bible and actually read through it instead of copying and pasting someone else's copying and past job, you would have seen this is where 2 MEN make a covenant between themselves and were not ordered by God to do it. Your entire argument is full of such holes. And now your putting physical attributes to the Holy Spirit which is neither or male or female but is in spirit form. And no Jesus did not break any of the commandments.
Mathew 5:17 "Don't assume that I came to destroy the Law or the Prophets. I did not come to destroy but to fulfill." - Jesus
I expected more from ATS then people that just accept what is presented to them, I seem to have been mistaken.
This is where I brush your sand from my boots and move on.
Reply if you like I will not see it. And whether you accept it or not, our Lord in Heaven is merciful and does not change. He just isn't a wuss.
originally posted by: mysticalmetalhippie
a reply to: fatkid
Peace and love ! Not a literal sword but a sword ( word ) of truth that wounds the satans unconsciousness ! Peace and love fom the mystical metal hippie
originally posted by: fatkid
a reply to: LadyGreenEyes
But both groups say they follow the same God (Jews and Muslims), you are one saying they don't.....
originally posted by: fatkid
a reply to: Invicid
Been gone for awhile sorry for late reply.
It doesn't matter if they are fictional or not, they are based on the same subject matter and God, even if that God isn't real, it is irrelevant to the topic of the books, it is like saying the Star Wars saga or the lord of the rings saga aren't about the same groups of characters because they are fiction
originally posted by: Invicid
originally posted by: fatkid
a reply to: Invicid
Been gone for awhile sorry for late reply.
It doesn't matter if they are fictional or not, they are based on the same subject matter and God, even if that God isn't real, it is irrelevant to the topic of the books, it is like saying the Star Wars saga or the lord of the rings saga aren't about the same groups of characters because they are fiction
And lastly, did you know that everything just mentioned was validated in the purge trials run by Emperor Nero? This is how we know Flavius Josephus full list of names and titles that he worked under. THEY WERE EXPOSED BY THE EMPIRE THEMSELVES! FULLY DOCUMENTED. In fact, Josephus's father (a senator) lost his life in this trial, and Josephus himself was sent into exile subsequently.
originally posted by: fatkid
a reply to: mysticalmetalhippie
Obviously, that is the point- quoting one line of scripture as the basis of an arguement is basically an insult to the entire work, but followers are quick to do it just to attempt to prove a point trying to force there view of an entire doctrine into 10 words and then grandstanding on the statement
originally posted by: fatkid
a reply to: Invicid
I have a job, I travel to places where the internet doesn't work, so no a cat doesn't have my tongue.
The topic of discussion you wish to have is very interesting; however, it has nothing to do with the religions based around the texts. You aren't accounting for the multitudes of people who follow the said religions or the subject of the text.
Your entire arguement is what is called a straw man
"A straw man is a common form of argument and is an informal fallacy based on giving the impression of refuting an opponent's argument, while actually refuting an argument that was not advanced by that opponent."