It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by cryptorsa1001
bodrul, your comment does not surprise me after looking at your avatar. You should be disgusted with yourself. The avatar compares hitler with bush. Hitler had people with mental desease fixed so they could not breed. He was involved with the occult and he killed at least 6 million jews most of them by buring them or starving them to death not to mention the millions he killed with his war machine.
Having a difference with bushes policies is one thing but comparing him to hitler is another.
Indog's posts are not based on reality so I guess neither are you.
Originally posted by Geneticus
Does this help anyone make a decision...
U.S. INTELLIGENCE OBTAINS IRANIAN NUKE PLANS
Originally posted by bodrul
Originally posted by cryptorsa1001
why should i be disgusted?
Since you live in the uk you should know the difference. I guess you are just too dumb to be able to figure it out.
1. bush always claims america is chosen by God
hitler claimed that the nazis were supperir to all others
When has bush ever said america was gods chosen people. I have listened to the majority of his speeches and have not heard it once.
2. i compare hitler to bush because they are the same bread
There is no comparison. Hitler truly was evil bush is just protecting america.
3. i will always compare the tyrent to hitler and the chances of me changing that view is more chances of bush been able to make a full sentence.
Put down the bong for a while and wake up and confront reality.
ps i like my avatar stu
by the way what is reality to you
because lies and making sh*t up seem to follow you
Point out where I have made up anything. Like I said earlier put the bong down and use your brain for a change.
[edit on 24-1-2005 by bodrul]
Gee, you're right, because the city has not acted timely enough to clean up grafitti, they obviously support what was written. How could I be so stupid, I guess that means my city government supports all the gangs that spray up the walls in my neighborhood. I knew it. Think about that claim again.
You didn't read anything I posted did you? YES. Israel has them. Throwing an opposing nuclear force, an irrational religious one bent on the other's destruction, is what I meant. Nuclear war will be a certainty, IMO. Is that acceptable to you? You still have not answered my question, as nobody has, DO YOU TRUST THE LIVES OF YOU AND YOUR LOVED ONES IN THE HANDS OF IRAN'S ISLAMIC FUNDAMENTALIST LEADERS???!!! Please answer, yes or no.
How can you be SO ignorant to the obvious. Iran does not wish to exist in harmony with Israel. Your point would only hold water if there were two nations that were trying to co-exist that maybe did not get along, but both just wanted to exist in peace. IRAN WANTS TO DESTROY ISRAEL, RESEARCH IT, IT'S NOT DISPUTED!!! What on Earth makes you think this will stabilize the region?
OH MY GOD!! I think my brain is bleeding! Do you not recall that they almost went to nuclear war a few times recently? And thus far, because Pakistan could go either way, neither party is currently ruled by religious extremists who think it's a good thing to die in battle against the other, the enemy of god. If that was the case, I doubt peaceful dialog would have prevailed, and the nightmare scenario you seem to welcome, would already have occured.
In an immensely differing situation, do you say we should have continued to allow Japan to use the WMD's they were using on the scale in which I presented to you? Does your heart not bleed for the hundreds of thousands, possibly millions, killed by Japan's bio-warfare tactics before we ended the war? What if Japan was able to gain their objective and use those bio weapons in Europe or (I know you don't care) the US?
You're right then, there is no point discussing geopolitics with me, Israel would destroy Iran from the air. Period. They would not be looking to occupy Iran, so no point in a ground invasion. And Israel would decimate any Iranian army on the move toward Israel with precision guided munitions and air power.
I think you have forgotten that Israel and US are currently planning a joint invasion of Iran.
Not a nuclear attack.
US has used nuclear weapons since then as well. In the gulf war 1991, it used tactical nuclear weapons and since then hundreds of thousands of Iraqis have died from depleted Uranium poisoning. Further, the "fanatics" you say(a term borrowed from western propoganda) have had chemical and biological weapons for a long time. Have they used them? Checkmate.
Checkmate? Whatever bio program they currently have is DEFINETLY not sufficient to completely wipe out Israel, there are a lot of logistics involved in bio-warfare, if they attacked Israel with bio weapons, Israel would nuke them, and rightfully so, I'm sure they know this, they would not obtain their objective
They were after "supposed" weapons programs that Iraq denied, but we KNOW, fully admitted by Iran, that they have a nuclear program. How are you not understanding this?
I was highly against Iraq, I still am, I don't buy anything that is fed to me, I make my own observations and I feel this actually is a threat, not Iraq, not NK, but Iran is a threat to world peace. So my "little mind" is far from confused. But yours will be fried in nuclear fire if things go your way.
So then you trust yours and your families lives in the hands of Iran's government, that's all you have to say. Why won't you?
So, you insult and stereotype one group of people, then you cry about how wrong it is to stereotype another? Enough said. I guess Bush was right, as painful as that is to say, those who are not with us, are against us. I'm concerned about the future of my son, if you wish to allow the world to be overflowing with nuclear weapons, in my eyes, you are my enemy.
So vested they wish to commit suicide for Iran? Don't think so, mate.
Why even bother with joint military excercises, as long as we're having a nuke party, there's no need. The world will end. Game over for us all, even for the mighty Russia and China. But it's all worth it, right? As long as you don't end up in one of our many Nazi/American death camps for muslims and Europeans.
as posted by Indigo_Child
Please provide me hard proof that the Iranian government wants to destroy Israel.
Originally posted by Indigo_Child
Again, read the article. The muncipality knew about the graffiti, and also knew it was common in the city. Nothing was done about it. However, who needs graffiti, when we have state terrorism against Palistine.
No, I did read your post. I just don't concur that Iran is an irrational, extremist terrorist nation or is anymore dangerous than others. The facts suggest Iran is a modernizing, relatively peaceful nation. I am willing to reconsider if you can present me the evidence to the contrary.
One of Iran’s most influential ruling clerics called on the Muslim states to use nuclear weapon against Israel, assuring them that while such an attack would annihilate Israel, it would cost them "damages only".
The speech by former Iranian President Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani failed to catch the attention of the western press but made waves in the Middle East.
"If a day comes when the world of Islam is duly equipped with the arms Israel has in its possession, the strategy of colonialism would face a stalemate because application of an atomic bomb would not leave anything in Israel but the same thing would just produce damages in the Muslim world", Former Iranian President Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani told the crowd at the traditional Friday prayers in Tehran.
Analysts told the Iranian Press Service that Rafsanjani's speech marks the first time a prominent leader of the Islamic Republic had openly suggested the use of nuclear weapon against the Jewish State.
Rafsanjani advised Western states not to pin their hopes on Israel's violence because it will be "very dangerous".
"We are not willing to see security in the world is harmed", he said, warning that a war "of the pious and martyrdom seeking forces against peaks of colonialism will be highly dangerous and might fan flames of World War III."
I would suggest you don't shout, as it causes your "brain to bleed"(your words, not mine)
Please provide me hard proof that the Iranian government wants to destroy Israel.
The Islamo-fascist regime of Iran is the next stop in this global war on terror. Why? Because if Iran acquires nuclear weaponry, Iran's ruling class of radical clerics -- the mullahs -- will undoubtedly target America and Israel.
Since 1979 -- when the Ayatollah Khomeini and his minions ousted the Shah -- Iranian leadership has forged alliances with a number of Islamic terrorist groups, most notably, the PLO and other Palestinian organizations. In the past few years, we've also heard that Iran has been aiding and harboring al-Qaida members. As scholar Michael Ledeen indicated in his book The War Against the Terror Masters, "Iran is the mother of modern Islamic terrorism" -- It's the premier terror state. Ledeen also underscored that, "Khomeini created one of the most dangerous international terrorist groups, Hezbollah, and Assad (Hafez al-Assad of Syria) supported it with many of the same favors." Hezbollah -- which is thoroughly enmeshed with the regimes of Iran and Syria -- is the model for terrorists as surrogates working hand-in-glove with terror sponsoring regimes. And, when enacting death and mayhem, there's nothing like the use of surrogates to help a terror state maintain plausible deniability.
In short, the web of terror seeks to destroy western civilization: America is the Big-Kahuna of the west, and Israel is the out-post of the west in the Islamic world. Vicious anti-Americanism has been endemic to this Iranian regime, with rhetoric such as "Death to America" and "America, the Great Satan" typically bandied about by hard-line fundamentalists. Although America has been dubbed the "Great Satan" by Iranian clerics, Israel is known as the "Little Satan." Moreover, the Iranian regime would like nothing better than to wipe Israel from the face of the earth and strike out against America in any way possible.
Just recently, India and Pakistan just mobilized thousands of troops on each others borders. They did not go to war. This was because they were nuclear powers. Realizing their status-quo, they were galvanized into a peace dialogue and have since had the warmest Indo-Pak relations ever.
As for Pakistan, it is a dictatorship, and has a frail nuclear-command structure. It is constantly threatening India of using them, even when India was planning surgical air strikes on terrorist camps in PoK Kashmir.
Russia and US, also came to this realization in the cold war, and were forced onto the table. So, it woud appear nuclear weapons have had quite a stabalizing effect universally. They are not called "peacemakers" for no reason.
Japan had offered a conditional surrender before the attacks on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. It was not accepted.
Four days after 70,000 -- 80,000 citizens of Hiroshima died from the atomic bomb blast on August 6, 1945 and many thousands more were injured, and one day after half as many residents of Nagasaki met a similar fate, the Japanese communicated to the United States their urgent desire to surrender, subject only to the condition that they might keep their Emperor.
Book Exposes WWII Japanese Biowarfare Program in China
A secret Japanese Army unit, dubbed Unit 731, sprayed Chinese villages with bacteria, spiked their wells with diseases and laced their food with germs, perhaps killing up to a million Chinese in World War II, according to a new book just out in the US.
"There could be over 700,000 or even 1 million" lives lost to Japan's biowarfare program, Daniel Barenblatt, author of, A Plague Upon Humanity, said in a recent interview.
The book, published in the United States by HarperCollins, tracks Japan's development of biological weaponry from 1931 to 1945 and its use of the weapons -- bubonic plague, typhoid, anthrax and cholera -- on civilians, many of them in China.
The biowarfare weapons were sprayed by aircraft on villages, or distributed in food, or passed on through bacteria put in wells. Some early weaponry involved dropping ceramic-shelled bombs filled with live disease-carrying flies and jellied cholera emulsion.
"Japan's biological warfare program in China was, as far as we know, the first use of scientifically organized germ warfare in history," said Iris Chang, author of The Rape of Nanking, the acclaimed book about the brutal Japanese occupation of the eastern Chinese city in 1937.
Barenblatt says the number of lives lost to biological warfare has been difficult to determine because the victims and their families, many of whom lived in remote villages in China, did not know why they became ill after being exposed to biological weapons unleashed by the Japanese army.
The nuclear attacks were not justified, rather they were used to show America's new toy.
Israel is not America. And Iran is not Iraq. Iran has a potent air force and navy and would cause unacceptable damage to Israel.
It's worse than a nuclear attack. It is the worlds most powerful and imperialist power(America) combining with the regions most powerful and aggressive power(Israel) invading a sovereign nation. It's criminal. It's evil.
And if Iran had nuclear weapons - it would not have materialised.
Henceforth, they are not an extremist and fanatical nation. An extremist and fanatical nation with the single-minded objective of Israels annihlation would have long ago showered Israeli cities with chemical and biological weapons. As I told you.
You can apply the same rationale to a nuclear attack. Iran would only have a small number of low yield nuclear weapons in a few years(assuming it is developing them) which would cause as much damage to Israel as a chemical and biological attack would. In response, Israel will completely vaporize Iran.
Finally, Iran is not a single-minded, suicide bombing, terrorist nation. I really must laugh at your highly stupid remarks that Iran is gearing up for a major suicide attack against Israel. Are you a Christian fanatic?
You're missing the point. Iraq was not invaded because of WMD, that was only part of the propoganda.
You are actually buying what is being fed to you by state propoganda. It's extremely clear how you shout MUST DESTROY EVIL, FANATICAL, TERRORIST, EXTREMIST NUKES OR DEATH TO THE WORLD Do you hear yourself talk? You sound as fanatical as some of those Islamic clerics.
Yet, what is hilarious about it, that Iran does not have any missiles capable of reaching you, and if it did get nukes, they would be so small and few, that they would likely be intercepted and the damage they would do would be minimal to even Israel.
So then you trust yours and your families lives in the hands of Iran's government, that's all you have to say. Why won't you?
Again, you evaded my points that Iran is not what you accuse it off. Iran is not going to do as much damage to the world as US has done and is still doing.
It's the truth isn't it? Your government lies to you all the time and you accept it. Again listen to yourself agree with "you are with us or against us" and then ask yourself are you brainwashed?
I did not say Russia and China will attack America. What I did say that it will create a lot of tensions that will grow exponentially, causing a chain reaction of events that will erupt into a world wide war. That is how other world wars in the past have been precipitated. Those who do not learn from history are condemned to repeat it.
We can see this already forming on a political level.
Yep, enjoy the fireworks you ordered. It is unfortunate that the fate of myself and my family relies on people like yourself, who just do not have a clue about what their governments are doing and sheepishly follow. Have you not even once asked yourself the question "why is my leader fighting so many wars one after the other" If the Germans had asked this question, we could have averted WWII.
Originally posted by cryptorsa1001
Put down the bong for a while and wake up and confront reality.
Originally posted by cryptorsa1001
There is no comparison. Hitler truly was evil bush is just protecting america.
Originally posted by cryptorsa1001
When has bush ever said america was gods chosen people. I have listened to the majority of his speeches and have not heard it once.
Originally posted by cryptorsa1001
Point out where I have made up anything. Like I said earlier put the bong down and use your brain for a change.
[edit on 24-1-2005 by bodrul]
Originally posted by devilwasp
Can i ask you people here a question, how can you be for war?
How can you support the killing and bloodshed?
But I do not want to roll over and expose my belly like a submissive dog if they continue to dodge inspections and buy time so they can pull a North Korea, saying "it's only for energy", until they develop enough weapons to finally say, like NK, "we have the bomb now, what are you going to do about it?" Iran is the one nation IMO, that would not act responsibly with nuclear weapons. I could be wrong I guess, but can we afford for me to be right?
* Israeli Prime minister, Ariel Sharon "Arabs may have the oil, but we have the matches.
Israeli foreign minister, Shimon Peres; "acquiring a superior weapons system (read nuclear) would mean the possibility of using it for compellent purposes - that is forcing the other side to accept Israeli political demands, which presumably include a demand that the traditional status quo be accepted and a peace treaty signed."
Economic adviser to Prime Minister Yitzhak Shamir, Amos rubin(1987); "If left to its own Israel will have no choice but to fall back on a riskier defense which will endanger itself and the world at large... To enable Israel to abstain from dependence on nuclear arms calls for $2 to 3 billion per year in U.S. aid." ....
During the 1973 war, Israel used nuclear blackmail to force Kissinger and Nixon to airlift massive amounts of military hardware to Israel. The Israeli Ambassador, Simha Dinitz, is quoted as saying, at the time, "If a massive airlift to Israel does not start immediately, then I will know that the U.S. is reneging on its promises and...we will have to draw very serious conclusions...
Director of the Israeli Institute for the Development of Weaponry, Munya Mardoch(1944); "The moral and political meaning of nuclear weapons is that states which renounce their use are acquiescing to the status of Vassal states. All those states which feel satisfied with possessing conventional weapons alone are fated to become vassal states.
Israel's current President, Ezar Weissman said; "The nuclear issue is gaining momentum (and the) next war will not be conventional.
In April 2002 Jewish academic David Perlmutter in the Los Angeles Times inferred Israel under some circumstances would launch revenge attacks against targets worldwide: "Israel has been building nuclear weapons for 30 years. The Jews understand what passive and powerless acceptance of doom has meant for them in the past, and they have ensured against it. Masada was not an example to follow--it hurt the Romans not a whit, but Sampson in Gaza? With an H-bomb? What would serve the Jew-hating world better in repayment for thousands of years of massacres but a Nuclear Winter. Or invite all those tut-tutting European statesmen and peace activists to join us in the ovens?
"For the first time in history, a people facing extermination while the world either cackles or looks away--unlike the Armenians, Tibetans, World War II European Jews or Rwandans--have the power to destroy the world. The ultimate justice?"
Israel Has Nuclear Weapons and MUST Use Them and All Those Arming the Arabs Must Share the Pain!
Israel must notify each of the Arab nations and their Western backers that, if Israel is attacked or is about to be attacked with unconventional weapons (or overwhelming conventional forces), there will be a "Share the Pain" response...
Therefore, Israel would be wise to notify each country that, either pre-emptively or as a vicious second-strike option, Israel will hit all hostile parties with nuclear weapons, regardless of who launched the first attack. Israel will hold all collectively and severally responsible - as if they had met and conspired together.
...One hundred or 200 nukes will reduce the hostile cities and army sites of the Middle East to rubble in minutes. Of course, the ensuing debris would also envelope those nations who sold the Arab world the weapons of nightmares. After all, they enjoyed the money and clearly understood that what they were selling was to be targeted at Israel.
Perhaps with a dedicated and credible deterrence, the Europeans selling weapons will make some effort, along with American Arabists, to have the Arab nations stand down their plans which call for the destruction of Israel and its replacement by an Islamic State....
Prof. Martin Van Crevel, a professor of military history at the Hebrew University in Jerusalem, recently put it this way... “Our armed forces are not the thirtieth strongest in the world, but rather the second or third. Israel has the capability of hitting most European capitals with nuclear weapons. We have the capability to take the world down with us. And I can assure you that this will happen before Israel goes under.”
In further context, Martin Van Crevel told interviewer Ferry Biedermann in Jerusalem in a widely quoted interview: "We possess several hundred atomic warheads and rockets and can launch them at targets in all directions, perhaps even at Rome. Most European capitals are targets of our air force".... Asked if he was worried about Israel becoming a rouge state if it carried out a genocidal deportation against Palestinians, Crevel quoted former Israeli Defense Minister Moshe Dayan who said "Israel must be like a mad dog, too dangerous to bother." Crevel argued that Israel wouldn't care much about becoming a rouge state. "Our armed forces are not the thirtieth strongest in the world, but rather the second or third. We have the capability to take the world down with us. And I can assure you that that this will happen before Israel goes under.
TEHRAN TIMES -- A high-ranking Israeli officer threatened that the Zionist regime would launch nuclear attack on Islamic holy sites in the Middle East, an Israeli newspaper said Sunday.
In case Israel was attacked by states or groups, the Jewish state would respond by dropping nuclear bombs on Islamic cities such as Mecca and Medina in Saudi Arabia and Qom in Iran. The Haaretz newspaper quoted an unidentified high-ranking officer a s saying.
It is an irony of our time Iraq has been suffering for a decade because it is accused of having some capabilities of unconventional weapons, while Israel announces that it possesses nuclear weapons, but there is not any international action against it.
The officer, a guide in the Israeli military academy, was quoted as saying that Israel possesses hundreds of nuclear warheads along with their delivery systems, including long-range ballistic missiles, long-range bombers and nuclear submarines.
Indeed, while is Iraq under the pressure, Israel is the only entity in the Middle East to possess a huge arsenal of weapons of mass destruction, including a sizable nuclear arsenal.
Isreal threats against Syria and Palestine(2004)
Israel is mounting a sustained and bloody military assault on the Gaza Strip that has left more than 20 dead.
The pretext for the latest offensive was provided by the August 31 suicide bombings of two buses in Beersheba, which killed 16 people and was claimed by the Islamic fundamentalist group Hamas. But, as so often in the past, such suicide bombings allow the government of Prime Minister Ariel Sharon to implement pre-existing plans for attacking Palestinians.
Sharon has made clear that he intends to inflict maximum damage against Hamas before implementing his supposed “unilateral disengagement” plan, which involves withdrawing the relatively small number of 7,000 Zionist settlers from Gaza while seizing vast swathes of the much larger West Bank and its more populous settlements and permanently annexing them to Israel. Israel will also maintain control of Gaza’s borders, coastline and airspace—making it a glorified prison camp.
Hamas carried out its Beersheba bus bombings in retaliation for Israel’s assassination earlier this year of two of its top leaders, Sheikh Yassin and Abdelaziz al-Rantissi.
Originally posted by Jakomo
Smacks of cowardice to me. You don't want to take the chance that Iran will try and nuke you without provocation and for no reason? So instead of POSSIBLY leaving yourself open to attack, you would rather DEFINITELY kill Iranians in order to protect your own people?
Because why? Because Americans contribute more to the world than Iranians? Because Iranians are all evil and Americans are all the paragons of goodness?
Racist, cowardly and stereotypical.
Originally posted by Indigo_Child
In light of all of this evidence, who do you think is more dangerous? Is it Iran that does not have any nuclear weapons and has not been aggressive towards any nation for a long time, or is Isreal, that is overly aggressive, dangerous and blackmails using threats of nuclear war. Not only that, but is even arming conventional missiles with nuclear tipped war heads - for "terrorists"