It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by cryptorsa1001
Iran attacks US military.
Iran holds American citizens hostage.
Indigo_Child wrote “If Iran had nuclear weapons it would have stabalized the region.”
Are you nuts? How would Iran owning nukes stabilize the region?
Originally posted by Indigo_Child
How does Israel, the only Middle Eastern state, having hundreds of nuclear weapons, being weaponized by the US and being the most aggresive nation in the region and shouting slogans of "death to the arabs" stabalize it? It doesn't.
It would halt other countries from weaponizing, as they would have the confidence that any aggressive actions by Israel would be contained by Iran.
But I have not seen any Israeli government officials shouting "death to the Arabs", have you? Maybe outraged citizens, but not government officials.
They like America's government are greedy, and driven by money. They would not just outright attack Iran with nukes. I don't disagree that Israel is not helping the peace process with some of it's actions, but they would not just nuke a non-nuclear Iran.
Are you 100% confident that Iran's Islamic fundamentalist government would not strike first with nukes to enforce what they see as god's will? Are you confident enough to risk nuclear fallout making it's way into Europe? Are you confident enough that you put your childrens' future in the hands of Islamic extremists?
Are you serious? If we allow Iran to obtain nukes, mark my words, Syria and who knows who else will start nuclear programs.
But I'm sure your resent of America will cause you to deny that, and you probably will allow that resent to take such a strong hold over you, that you would rather see all out nuclear war, that costs the lives of countless people, than to support the US position, even if it's in your best interest.
Do you believe everybody has the right to have nuclear weapons? Do you really think that would be the best way to peace on Earth?
Originally posted by Indigo_Child
Intimidating graffiti is by no means a monopoly of the Palestinians. In Jerusalem early this year, a group of Israeli volunteers disturbed by the frequent "Death to the Arabs" and "Expel the Arabs" slogans on walls took it upon themselves to paint them over after the municipality left them intact
Then consider the countless atrocities of Israeli soliders against Palistianians and Arabs. Now, is this stabalizing? Yeah I know they're both doing it, but two wrongs do not make a right, do they?
There is no fundamental policy that says a non-nuclear country cannot be attacked with nukes. In the only times they have been used, by America, was against Japan, a non-nuclear country. National security is not decided on false-assurance. Can you convince Iran that Israel will not use nuclear weapons on them?
Can you convince Iran that it would not be invaded by America? You will have a hard time convincing them,with America and Israel planning an invasion of Iran right now.
No I am 100% confident that if Iran uses a nuclear weapon, it will be wiped out of the face of this planet, and I am 100% confident Iran knows that
Syria would have no need too, if Iran got nuclear weapons. In the same way Japan and Taiwan don't feel the need to, because America has nuclear weapons.
What's in my best interest is peace and freedom. And I do see nuclear war, if Iran is invaded, and it's a global one and it involves Russia, China and Europe.
As someone supporting America, who is the only country in the world to have used nuclear and radiological weapons on more than one occasion, and also the most warring nation in the world, I don't think you are in any position to judge who should and should not.
Originally posted by Indigo_Child
Then consider the countless atrocities of Israeli soliders against Palistianians and Arabs. Now, is this stabalizing? Yeah I know they're both doing it, but two wrongs do not make a right, do they?
Maybe you should read this web site in order to educate yourself on the Israel and Arab conflict.
Indigo you say not to judge Iran by what they did 20 years ago but you have judged America for nuking Japan 59 or so years ago. There is a word for that.
27jd
you just got my way above vote.
[edit on 24-1-2005 by cryptorsa1001]
[edit on 24-1-2005 by cryptorsa1001]
Originally posted by cryptorsa1001
Indigo you say not to judge Iran by what they did 20 years ago but you have judged America for nuking Japan 59 or so years ago. There is a word for that.
The Japanese army regularly conducted "Field Tests". Planes dropped plague-infected fleas over Ningbo in eastern China and over Changde in north-central China.
Japanese troops dropped cholera and typhoid cultures in water reservoirs, wells and ponds.
Cottony material and feathers coated with anthrax bacteria were used to spread the disease in an airborne manner, as such fibers had been found to be effective in keeping the bacteria alive long enough to reach the intended human victims.
Witnesses recall watching Japanese airplanes dropping a mixture of wheat, millet, soy beans, rice, cotton fibers, paper and fabric cuttings, aerial spraying pathogens over the cities . They all had been coated with the biological organism or with fleas and brought the germs to people.
Japanese distributed infected food, cakes, drink, clothes and children's candies to the locals.
The same mass infections were being repeated all over China.
"Glanders was a disease first found in horses, and it could attack human beings," said Furmanski. Human beings' legs are most affected by the disease. "Only one out of 20 people with the disease could survive.
Medical records showed that glanders had virtually been wiped out in 1906, but new cases suddently broke out in the 1940s during WWII in China."
Japanese showered 7 WMD Biological pathogens on Zhejiang province to retaliate the Doolittle Tokyo Raid.
Even today, one hard-hit village in Zhejiang still bears the nickname "Rotten-Leg Village" because so many older residents are scarred by glanders from the 1942 attacks. Their flesh are still rotten and have not been healed since they were attacked - they have been suffering for almost 60 years now.
Sheldon H. Harris, a historian at California State University and author of the book, "Factories of Death: Japanese Biological Warfare 1932-45 and the American Cover-up" stressed that "My calculation, which is very conservative, and based on incomplete sources as the major archives are still closed, is that 10,000 to 12,000 human beings were exterminated in lab experiments".
Outside the 731 prisons, the "Field Tests" were carried out all over China including Manchuria.
Scholars believe that the toll from Japanese-seeded cholera epidemics in the southern province of Yunnan alone may reach the staggering figure of 200,000 killed in May 1942.
3 months later, another 200,000 die in Shandong province as a result of Unit 731’s germ warfare. In the Zhekiang province city of Quzhou alone, over 50,000 perished from bubonic plague and cholera .............
As the war was ending, Japanese purposely released all the plague-infected animals. The Northeastern China immediately became a disaster area and caused outbreaks of plague that killed at least another 30,000 people from 1946 - 1948.
" There could be over 700,000 or even 1,000,000" lives lost to Japan's biowarfare program" said Daniel Barenblatt, author of new book A Plague Upon Humanity: The Secret Genocide of Axis Japan's Germ Warfare Operation.
These crimes are more than parallel to the coeval work of Joseph Mengele and the Nazi doctors.
Japanese military scientists killed 12 times the number of civilians as did the Nazi's Angel of Death - Dr. Josef Mengele.
Nazi doctors were held accountable for their crimes in the famous 1947 "Nuremberg Doctors Trials", but there were NO comparable "Japanese Doctors Trials".
But you see, I doubt that graffiti was placed there by government officials, so how exactly does this prove your point? My point is, Iran's official position, by the government, is that Israel does not have the right to exist, per their religious beliefs.
Then consider the countless atrocities of Israeli soliders against Palistianians and Arabs. Now, is this stabalizing? Yeah I know they're both doing it, but two wrongs do not make a right, do they?
There is no fundamental policy that says a non-nuclear country cannot be attacked with nukes. In the only times they have been used, by America, was against Japan, a non-nuclear country. National security is not decided on false-assurance. Can you convince Iran that Israel will not use nuclear weapons on them?
There we go again, let's talk about America the great satan using nukes way back when.
Israel will NOT nuke Iran unless first nuked by Iran. Why would they
Militarily they would destroy Iran, they would have no need to nuke them.
Not to mention there are several balancing nuclear powers on that side of the world who would not appreciate Israel just outright nuking people in their backyard. And the US would not allow Israel to do it either. Get real.
The US has not used nuclear weapons since, and there have been plenty of wars. Israel has had nukes for some time, and have never threatened ANYBODY with them. But you're so sure the fanatical religious leaders bent on Israel's destruction wouldn't either, right? You're absolutely positive? Yeah right. Again, you're so resentful toward America and Israel you don't care.
Absolutely. If they fully disclose and allow to be verified that their nuclear program is peaceful and for energy only, America would not be able to invade. Nobody, including just about every citizen here would permit it.
Have you read any of my previous posts? Iran is run by EXTREMIST, FUNDAMENTAL CLERICS! They believe that if they die carrying out the will of god, they go to paradise. What part of that don't you get? Don't dodge my question. ARE YOU WILLING TO PUT YOURS AND YOUR CHILDRENS' FUTURE IN THE HANDS OF FUNDAMENTAL ISLAM?
Syria would have no need too, if Iran got nuclear weapons. In the same way Japan and Taiwan don't feel the need to, because America has nuclear weapons.
The word "naive" comes to mind. I can guarantee you that letting Iran obtain nukes, will not only increase chances of nuclear conflict at least ten fold, but will create a windfall of aspiring nuclear powers, mark my words.
And allowing the creation of more nuclear powers is in the best interest of peace? I can't believe what I'm reading. There's no way in hell that Russia or China are going to initiate the destruction of the world because the US invades Iran to stop them from obtaining nukes. Do they care about Iran so much they are willing to see their countries turned to glass by starting nuclear war with America? Please. They will demand America cease, to appease their citizens, like they always do, and nothing more. They are far more concerned about themselves than sticking up for the religious nutcases in power in Iran, don't kid yourself.
You're right. Nukes for everybody, what a lovely vision for peace. What a stable world it will be.
Originally posted by cryptorsa1001
Indigo_Child, what drugs are you on?
China invades Japan?
America uses nukes on Iraq during the gulf war.
Get a clue!!!!!
No use trying to debate an idiot!!!!
Originally posted by Indigo_Child
If you read carefully, the city muncipality is a government organization and they have done nothing about it. As for the government of Israel, I suppose waging constant bloody war against Palistinians, means nothing?
No one is throwing nuclear weapons into the mix. They're already there. Israel has them, possibly hundreds of them. For, Iran to then get some for it's safety is like pissing into the ocean to increase it's volume.
Stability, as in a state that is not subject to sudden change or fluctuation is achieved when there is a balance of power. As we know, there is not a balance of power in Middle East, rather there is extreme disparity. It is not the weights or forces(in this case nuclear weapons) themselves that cause the destabalization, rather, it's the amount of weights on both sides.
The same has happened between India and Pakistan.
Therefore, I submit again, that Iran acquiring at least some nuclear offensive capability will have a stabalizing effect on the region.
You said something to the effect that a nuclear power will not use nukes on a non nuclear power. I was simply showing you they could and have.
Israel cannot militarily destroy Iran in a conventional conflict, and If you think so, I don't see any reason trying to discuss serious geopolitics with you. While, Israel has a modern and powerful army, it does not have enough power to invade Iran, which is more or less as powerful. It would be too costly for either side and would end up as a stalemate.
I think you have forgotten that Israel and US are currently planning a joint invasion of Iran.
US has used nuclear weapons since then as well. In the gulf war 1991, it used tactical nuclear weapons and since then hundreds of thousands of Iraqis have died from depleted Uranium poisoning. Further, the "fanatics" you say(a term borrowed from western propoganda) have had chemical and biological weapons for a long time. Have they used them? Checkmate.
Oh, you mean like the UN inspectors in Iraq? I hate to break it to you, but the UN inspectors found nothing, and Iraq was still invaded.
Just like with Iraq, not only are we hearing "WMD" again, but everything else that came with it "liberation", "democracy" "terrorism" it's to confuse your little minds. What is pretty disturbing about it - it's obvious.
Yes, very extreme fundamentalist clerics. So extreme and fundamentalist that they did not harm a single American in 80's hostage crisis. So extreme and fundamentalist, they have not used their aresnal of chemical and biological weapons yet. Does that make sense to you? I got some advice for you mate, don't believe everything you hear, especially US propoganda.
It really does astound me how gullible american people are. You'll believe anything that is on CNN. I am sorry to burst your bubble, but the Muslim countries are not full of bearded barbarians on tanks.
Then you underestimate Russia and China, and don't understand geopolitics and are not aware of their positions on the war. Russia and China are Iran's friends and have vested interests in Iran.
Russia will NOT take lightly to an invasion of Iran, especially, considering that America is expandingly so aggressively in the Middle east and has become meglomaniacal like Nazi Germany. Russia has publically condemened US and declared it's support for Iran and Syria. It is also engaging in joint military exercises with China.
My vision for the world is one of peace, harmony and love and light. In an ideal world I would not want anyone to have nuclear weapons. However, I got news for you, this is not an ideal world. There has to be mutual disarmenment or mututal destructin. It's one or the other.
Originally posted by cryptorsa1001
Indigo_Child, what drugs are you on?
China invades Japan?
America uses nukes on Iraq during the gulf war.
Get a clue!!!!!
No use trying to debate an idiot!!!!