It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Useless SJW gives the finger to the wrong dude.

page: 65
86
<< 62  63  64    66  67  68 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Oct, 3 2016 @ 07:05 PM
link   

originally posted by: Bedlam

originally posted by: thepixelpusher
Another Twitter post by Tara today saying she won't stop until he "gets popped" for doing this to her.


Oh, my. Perhaps the man should up the ante then by getting a TRO on her, and then get some video of it driving her into fits of violating it because she was told 'no' by someone.

I'm sure the court would readily grant such an order, given the circumstance.


She does have a temporary restraining order on her by the guy. The court sent it on 9/28 to her. Curiously, she hasn't mentioned it in her Twitter. Wonder why she's keeping all her disciples in the dark? Could it be she doesn't want to explain what really happened to shatter the myth she's built up? #TaraTheMartyr
edit on 3-10-2016 by thepixelpusher because: (no reason given)




posted on Oct, 3 2016 @ 08:14 PM
link   

originally posted by: Martin75
a reply to: JohnPrewett

Does or does not anyone have the "right" [in America] to respond to insult with violence ?
Does or does not anyone have the "right" [in America] to respond to insult with violence ?
Does or does not anyone have the "right" [in America] to respond to insult with violence ?

...... No one here thinks that it is OK to respond to insults with violence. .....


SOME believe it is OK for SOME to respond to SOME insults with violence.
But wrong for some others to respond to insult with violence.



posted on Oct, 3 2016 @ 08:14 PM
link   
a reply to: JohnPrewett


Does or does not anyone have the "right" [in America] to respond to insult with violence ?

As I said once, it depends on the situation. In most cases no, but there are exceptions.

If you're looking for a yes or no answer, pick a topic other than legal.

TheRedneck



posted on Oct, 3 2016 @ 08:15 PM
link   
a reply to: JohnPrewett

Please explain what the man did that was violent?

TheRedneck



posted on Oct, 3 2016 @ 08:28 PM
link   
Has anyone sent the tararist a tweet with a link to this thread?

She probably wouldn't read it though, it would require her venturing out of her echo chamber.



posted on Oct, 3 2016 @ 08:44 PM
link   
Tara is busy. She's been served papers again today.

Court Date Oct. 12th.

Things just got real for her.
edit on 3-10-2016 by thepixelpusher because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 3 2016 @ 09:13 PM
link   

originally posted by: thepixelpusher
Tara is busy. She's been served papers again today.

Court Date Oct. 12th.


Yep...got a notification sent to me by the folks in the know.

Fast court date means serious action, that or tiny town and I don't think from what I've found it is a really tiny town.



posted on Oct, 3 2016 @ 09:21 PM
link   
a reply to: Vasa Croe

She got served papers on 9/28 and today for the second time. I'm not a lawyer so I don't know if that's part of a single process or a different one. Tara has never indicated on Twitter she's been served yet. Seems she eager to take on the court challenge since she mentioned popping him. Best if her lawyers do all the talking.
edit on 3-10-2016 by thepixelpusher because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 3 2016 @ 10:33 PM
link   
a reply to: thepixelpusher

9/28 was probably the temporary restraining order. Today was probably for the hearing/trial.

If it was for something like harassment (a misdemeanor) some courts will do a quick and dirty trial on the hearing date. She's screwed if that happens. It comes down to her word against the DA's, and that's an almost certain conviction.

She would have the automatic right to appeal and ask for a real trial with a Public Defender if that happened.

Alabama does this; not sure about WA. I should also say I absolutely disagree with this kind of procedure. Even Tara Dublin deserves a fair trial.

TheRedneck



posted on Oct, 3 2016 @ 11:16 PM
link   
I'm sure she'll have her say. She has lawyered up now too.



posted on Oct, 4 2016 @ 04:35 AM
link   

originally posted by: TheRedneck
a reply to: JohnPrewett


Does or does not anyone have the "right" [in America] to respond to insult with violence ?


As I said once, it depends on the situation. In most cases no, but there are exceptions.

.................. TheRedneck


Please give a couple of examples of the top few "exceptions" .... What if anything gives some people "exceptional" rights ...



posted on Oct, 4 2016 @ 05:50 AM
link   

originally posted by: TheRedneck
a reply to: thepixelpusher

9/28 was probably the temporary restraining order. Today was probably for the hearing/trial.

If it was for something like harassment (a misdemeanor) some courts will do a quick and dirty trial on the hearing date. She's screwed if that happens. It comes down to her word against the DA's, and that's an almost certain conviction.

She would have the automatic right to appeal and ask for a real trial with a Public Defender if that happened.

Alabama does this; not sure about WA. I should also say I absolutely disagree with this kind of procedure. Even Tara Dublin deserves a fair trial.

TheRedneck




What he said....

THough it could be she wasn't actually served the first time. you have to answer the door and actually get the papers in hand. He may have had to hire an independent party to serve her when she left the house or something.....I had to do this myself with my Ex because she would not answer.

The first service likely includes a temp order and court date.

If it goes anything like her others from what I read on them, she may not show in which case the order is automatically granted. If there is a suit involved that wouldn't be good for her.
edit on 10/4/16 by Vasa Croe because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 4 2016 @ 05:55 AM
link   

originally posted by: JohnPrewett

originally posted by: Martin75
a reply to: JohnPrewett

Does or does not anyone have the "right" [in America] to respond to insult with violence ?
Does or does not anyone have the "right" [in America] to respond to insult with violence ?
Does or does not anyone have the "right" [in America] to respond to insult with violence ?

...... No one here thinks that it is OK to respond to insults with violence. .....


SOME believe it is OK for SOME to respond to SOME insults with violence.
But wrong for some others to respond to insult with violence.



We are discussing a case where no violence has been displayed at this point. Who knows what the CCTV footage he has will show though. I have heard she threw bottles at the house which would imply a level of violence from her.

And yes, there are times when violence occurs and the courts tell you that you had it coming. Typically if someone berates a person over and over and they lash out. Like if I was with my wife and someone decided to get in her face and call her names and whatnot. If I hit that person then, as long as I have the evidence on my side for the harassment, a court would most likely say the person got what they deserved.

Everyone must be accountable for their actions.



posted on Oct, 4 2016 @ 07:03 AM
link   
Word is Tara has to appear in court on Oct. 12th for stalking and criminal charges.



posted on Oct, 4 2016 @ 07:26 AM
link   

originally posted by: thepixelpusher
Word is Tara has to appear in court on Oct. 12th for stalking and criminal charges.


Yep...wishing there was a CCTV feed for this one. It will go one of two ways....she will either lose it and accuse the entire system of being against her or will break down crying and beg forgiveness....



posted on Oct, 4 2016 @ 07:32 AM
link   
a reply to: JohnPrewett


Please give a couple of examples of the top few "exceptions" .... What if anything gives some people "exceptional" rights ...

Violence is allowed in self-defense if one reasonably fears for their safety. For instance, if one were surrounded by a group of people shouting insults, and one reasonably feared for their safety, one can protect themselves even by initiating first physical contact.

There are no 'exceptional rights.' There are exceptions to traditional rules of conduct and legal restrictions. You know that as well as I do. Your attempt to twist words is childish.

You're obviously trying to twist laws here. When did the man in this case use violence against Tara? This is the second time I have asked. I answered your question three times now; are you capable of doing the same?

TheRedneck



posted on Oct, 4 2016 @ 07:38 AM
link   

originally posted by: Vasa Croe

originally posted by: thepixelpusher
Word is Tara has to appear in court on Oct. 12th for stalking and criminal charges.


Yep...wishing there was a CCTV feed for this one. It will go one of two ways....she will either lose it and accuse the entire system of being against her or will break down crying and beg forgiveness....


I will predict that if judge is a male, she will take your option one route. If the judge is female, she will take the option two.



posted on Oct, 4 2016 @ 07:42 AM
link   
a reply to: thepixelpusher

Stalking is a Class B misdemeanor here; in Washington it is a 'gross misdemeanor' or a Class B felony under certain circumstances (which I do not think apply). Now, I do not know what a 'gross misdemeaner' is exactly, but I am assuming it is similar to a Class A misdemeanor here.

Here a Class A misdemeanor can easily carry up to a year in jail. Getting out of line with a cop pretty much guarantees that.

TheRedneck



posted on Oct, 4 2016 @ 07:42 AM
link   

originally posted by: CynConcepts

originally posted by: Vasa Croe

originally posted by: thepixelpusher
Word is Tara has to appear in court on Oct. 12th for stalking and criminal charges.


Yep...wishing there was a CCTV feed for this one. It will go one of two ways....she will either lose it and accuse the entire system of being against her or will break down crying and beg forgiveness....


I will predict that if judge is a male, she will take your option one route. If the judge is female, she will take the option two.


Fair enough...should be fairly simple to find out who the judge is and if I have time today I'll take a look.



posted on Oct, 4 2016 @ 07:47 AM
link   
a reply to: CynConcepts

Maybe a little misogynistic of me, but she might have it worse if the judge is a woman. I recently sat on a jury under a woman judge. She's as sweet and nice as she can be outside the courtroom (have met her casually before), but when she sits at that bench... tough as nails and mean as a starving Rottweiler!

TheRedneck



new topics

top topics



 
86
<< 62  63  64    66  67  68 >>

log in

join