It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Help ATS via PayPal:
learn more

Useless SJW gives the finger to the wrong dude.

page: 62
86
<< 59  60  61    63  64  65 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Oct, 3 2016 @ 11:48 AM
link   

originally posted by: thepixelpusher


Tara tweeted this after the order?



Ha...so I guess she didn't know until a couple days after he filed that she was about to get served. Glad she's called out on it now...




posted on Oct, 3 2016 @ 11:50 AM
link   

originally posted by: InTheLight

originally posted by: TheRedneck
a reply to: InTheLight


It will be interesting to know the judge's findings on this type of political social unrest...

The judge will not give a judgement on political social unrest. That's not how it works.

The judge will review the evidence submitted by the attorneys, listen to the arguments made by the attorneys, and consider the testimony of any witnesses during the trial. He will then make a decision based on that information as to whether a law was broken and hand down an applicable verdict. The burden of proof is initially on the plaintiff (the man in this case), then if the judge feels there is sufficient evidence to continue, on the defendant (Tara Dublin in this case). If she can prove her innocence, or disprove the allegations against her, there will be no judgement/conviction; if she cannot, the judge will award damages if the case is civil, or will sentence her if it is criminal.

That's all it is: two people looking to the court to right an alleged wrong. This will not have any consequences toward the election, social attitudes, or anything so wide-ranging. Only the Federal or higher State courts do that.

I can understand how recent Supreme Court decisions can give the impression that this is more than it is, but this is not going before the Federal courts. It's one out-of-control, twitter-addicted, insane woman going off the deep end and attacking a man without reason. That's all, despite what Tara or anyone else wants it to be.

TheRedneck


It will most likely result in the judge telling both parties they behaved badly and start acting like adults.


There is no equal behaviour here. What this woman did was pathetic and vindictive. She's a moron. The guy did nothing wrong at all and if he has filed suit against her, I hope she gets punished for her anti-social behaviour accordingly. She needs to be taught a lesson - one which I would hope would also let others like her that her behaviour is totally unacceptable.



posted on Oct, 3 2016 @ 11:55 AM
link   
a reply to: UKTruth

Her family should get her help before she is arrested.

Wonder if her pneumonia comment toward him after getting served with Restraining order is actionable?
edit on 3-10-2016 by thepixelpusher because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 3 2016 @ 12:09 PM
link   

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: InTheLight

originally posted by: TheRedneck
a reply to: InTheLight


It will be interesting to know the judge's findings on this type of political social unrest...

The judge will not give a judgement on political social unrest. That's not how it works.

The judge will review the evidence submitted by the attorneys, listen to the arguments made by the attorneys, and consider the testimony of any witnesses during the trial. He will then make a decision based on that information as to whether a law was broken and hand down an applicable verdict. The burden of proof is initially on the plaintiff (the man in this case), then if the judge feels there is sufficient evidence to continue, on the defendant (Tara Dublin in this case). If she can prove her innocence, or disprove the allegations against her, there will be no judgement/conviction; if she cannot, the judge will award damages if the case is civil, or will sentence her if it is criminal.

That's all it is: two people looking to the court to right an alleged wrong. This will not have any consequences toward the election, social attitudes, or anything so wide-ranging. Only the Federal or higher State courts do that.

I can understand how recent Supreme Court decisions can give the impression that this is more than it is, but this is not going before the Federal courts. It's one out-of-control, twitter-addicted, insane woman going off the deep end and attacking a man without reason. That's all, despite what Tara or anyone else wants it to be.

TheRedneck


It will most likely result in the judge telling both parties they behaved badly and start acting like adults.


There is no equal behaviour here. What this woman did was pathetic and vindictive. She's a moron. The guy did nothing wrong at all and if he has filed suit against her, I hope she gets punished for her anti-social behaviour accordingly. She needs to be taught a lesson - one which I would hope would also let others like her that her behaviour is totally unacceptable.


How many signs did this guy have out on his lawn?



posted on Oct, 3 2016 @ 12:11 PM
link   

originally posted by: InTheLight

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: InTheLight

originally posted by: TheRedneck
a reply to: InTheLight


It will be interesting to know the judge's findings on this type of political social unrest...

The judge will not give a judgement on political social unrest. That's not how it works.

The judge will review the evidence submitted by the attorneys, listen to the arguments made by the attorneys, and consider the testimony of any witnesses during the trial. He will then make a decision based on that information as to whether a law was broken and hand down an applicable verdict. The burden of proof is initially on the plaintiff (the man in this case), then if the judge feels there is sufficient evidence to continue, on the defendant (Tara Dublin in this case). If she can prove her innocence, or disprove the allegations against her, there will be no judgement/conviction; if she cannot, the judge will award damages if the case is civil, or will sentence her if it is criminal.

That's all it is: two people looking to the court to right an alleged wrong. This will not have any consequences toward the election, social attitudes, or anything so wide-ranging. Only the Federal or higher State courts do that.

I can understand how recent Supreme Court decisions can give the impression that this is more than it is, but this is not going before the Federal courts. It's one out-of-control, twitter-addicted, insane woman going off the deep end and attacking a man without reason. That's all, despite what Tara or anyone else wants it to be.

TheRedneck


It will most likely result in the judge telling both parties they behaved badly and start acting like adults.


There is no equal behaviour here. What this woman did was pathetic and vindictive. She's a moron. The guy did nothing wrong at all and if he has filed suit against her, I hope she gets punished for her anti-social behaviour accordingly. She needs to be taught a lesson - one which I would hope would also let others like her that her behaviour is totally unacceptable.


How many signs did this guy have out on his lawn?


Pics in the thread if you've read through it. Or go to Madworldnews.com to read article.
edit on 3-10-2016 by thepixelpusher because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 3 2016 @ 12:22 PM
link   

originally posted by: TerryMcGuire
Stupid anti-trumper and stupid trumper. But let's just focus on the stupid anti-trumper.





posted on Oct, 3 2016 @ 12:27 PM
link   

originally posted by: JacKatMtn
a reply to: avgguy

Pretty sad when a yard sign can trigger folks...


Doesn't that speak to the frustration and anger some of the American citizens are feeling right now?



posted on Oct, 3 2016 @ 12:27 PM
link   

originally posted by: InTheLight

originally posted by: TerryMcGuire
Stupid anti-trumper and stupid trumper. But let's just focus on the stupid anti-trumper.





read the thread.
edit on 3-10-2016 by thepixelpusher because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 3 2016 @ 12:27 PM
link   

originally posted by: InTheLight

originally posted by: TerryMcGuire
Stupid anti-trumper and stupid trumper. But let's just focus on the stupid anti-trumper.





Judge already put Restraining order on the only guilty party. The anti-Trumper. So I guess the court has spoken on this. Will you accept that?
edit on 3-10-2016 by thepixelpusher because: (no reason given)

edit on 3-10-2016 by thepixelpusher because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 3 2016 @ 12:28 PM
link   
on the 28th Tara also linked to another slanderous article on the guy via Twitter.
edit on 3-10-2016 by thepixelpusher because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 3 2016 @ 12:35 PM
link   

originally posted by: thepixelpusher

originally posted by: InTheLight

originally posted by: TerryMcGuire
Stupid anti-trumper and stupid trumper. But let's just focus on the stupid anti-trumper.





Judge already put Restrainimg order on the only guilty party. The anti-Trumper. So O guess the court has spoken on this. Will you accept that?


Of course, I will accept that, but will you accept that this thread has nothing to do with her being a social justice warrior nor feminist. She was simply frustrated and angry at a Trump supporter who probably went overboard on his lawn signs - which, unfortunately triggered her to show him how she felt about his choice for candidate. But she chose to flip the guy off instead of using violence, unlike other anti-Trumpers who are choosing violence to make their feelings known.

I can only see these types of incidences increasing as the frustration and anger rises, and it is a very sad situation for you Americans.



posted on Oct, 3 2016 @ 12:47 PM
link   
a reply to: InTheLight

How many Democrats just drive past yards with Trump signs in and respect the other person's right to show support for a different candidate?

How many Republicans do the same?

Excusing this woman's behaviour is a big part of the problem.

It needs to be called out for the idiotic act of uncivilised intolerance that it is. Any attempt to downplay what she (and other political and social retards) have done is simply foolish. Every one of them needs to be pilloried until they change their ways and act civilised like normal people.



posted on Oct, 3 2016 @ 12:47 PM
link   
a reply to: InTheLight



She was simply frustrated and angry at a Trump supporter who probably went overboard on his lawn signs -



Are you being serious right now!?!

I can put 50 PRO-Trump signs in my yard and YOU or anyone else just has to deal with it.

I think you need to read through this thread before making comments...you are only making yourself look bad!



posted on Oct, 3 2016 @ 12:49 PM
link   
Let the good times Lulz.



posted on Oct, 3 2016 @ 12:54 PM
link   

originally posted by: Martin75
a reply to: InTheLight



She was simply frustrated and angry at a Trump supporter who probably went overboard on his lawn signs -



Are you being serious right now!?!

I can put 50 PRO-Trump signs in my yard and YOU or anyone else just has to deal with it.

I think you need to read through this thread before making comments...you are only making yourself look bad!



If you put 50 PRO-Trump signs on your lawn, then don't be naive or surprised when someone flips you the bird.

I am pointing out the frustration and anger both political sides are feeling and that her behaviour, while unacceptable, is nothing compared to the physical violence displayed at rallies by both sides.



posted on Oct, 3 2016 @ 12:56 PM
link   

originally posted by: SprocketUK
a reply to: InTheLight

How many Democrats just drive past yards with Trump signs in and respect the other person's right to show support for a different candidate?

How many Republicans do the same?

Excusing this woman's behaviour is a big part of the problem.

It needs to be called out for the idiotic act of uncivilised intolerance that it is. Any attempt to downplay what she (and other political and social retards) have done is simply foolish. Every one of them needs to be pilloried until they change their ways and act civilised like normal people.


What about the other political supporters that show their anger through violence at rallies. Isn't this a more important issue than droning on and on about one single anti-Trumper giving someone the finger?
edit on 3-10-2016 by InTheLight because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 3 2016 @ 12:59 PM
link   
a reply to: InTheLight
Grow up! That is what is wrong with this world! If you are so easily triggered maybe you shouldn't leave this house.

THIS was his yard by the way. Care to rethink your argument!?!

An you REALLY need to read. She has done SO much more than just "flip someone off"

edit on 10/3/2016 by Martin75 because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 3 2016 @ 01:00 PM
link   

originally posted by: Lysergic
Let the good times Lulz.


It looks like there will be no good times rolling for Americans, from what I can see.



posted on Oct, 3 2016 @ 01:01 PM
link   
a reply to: InTheLight

Oh they are there for the taking.

Trust me.



posted on Oct, 3 2016 @ 01:01 PM
link   

originally posted by: Martin75
a reply to: InTheLight
Grow up! That is what is wrong with this world! If you are so easily triggered maybe you shouldn't leave this house.

THIS was his yard by the way. Care to rethink your argument!?!

An you REALLY need to read. She has done SO much more than just "flip someone off"


Yeah, I thought so, overkill.



new topics

top topics



 
86
<< 59  60  61    63  64  65 >>

log in

join