a reply to: Pyle
It is about addressing their needs. Right? And it doesnt matter where that is done, since we are trying to help them the most with the money allotted.
Is there NO WHERE in the ME or their country where that can happen?
Were the refugee camps being attacked?
I say build them a city instead of a tent town. I say keep them in their country since that is where they would prosper.
Take all this money, and just give it to the refugees, and they will buy food, security, housing, and so on. In fact, they will be upper middle class
But since this is about something else....
Or, give it to OUR POOR, and leave Syria to Syrians.
Stop waging ANY WAR THERE. Leave them the hell alone. This is all BS because Obama and Hillary just had to get involved in another countrys civil
war. A civil war that would have ended years ago if international players werent playing proxy warfare.
A market for weapons and soldiers that was created by the same powers that now pretend to care.
The president of the Phillippines was right when these same people pretend to care and cite humanitarianism, and international concensus....F U is the
You want to fill the poorest areas of the US with Syrian refugees, instead of helping rid our country of poverty. F U.
Just proves that poverty is perpetuated in this country, yet we can help the worlds poor. Please.
edit on 9 22 2016 by tadaman because: (no reason given)