It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Help ATS via PayPal:
learn more

Trump Refused to Pay Winner of 1M Golf Contest Prize Used Charity Money to Settle

page: 24
65
<< 21  22  23    25 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Sep, 26 2016 @ 06:58 PM
link   

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: matafuchs
a reply to: Annee

If accusations are fact, so is the title of this thread. - Trump refused nothing. It was those putting on the event who were renting the facilities.


Trump wrote the check from his charity Foundation.



So? We're going round in circles. Charities write cheques all the time, including to other charities.


If he didn't write this check (and the several other possible self-dealing situations), there would be nothing to investigate.

I'm not going 'round in circles.

I've stayed firmly planted in the same place. "check ---- self-dealing"


I know. You've been in a completely unsupported position the whole way through.
There is no evidence of self-dealing.


LOL - - - that is hilarious.





posted on Sep, 26 2016 @ 07:06 PM
link   
a reply to: imjack

So, reading David's twitter.

Trump diverts money owed to him to his charity without paying taxes on it. (allegedly)

Then pays his debts with his charity money. (allegedly)

Auto-response to any who wish to comment: ALLEGEDLY.



posted on Sep, 26 2016 @ 07:08 PM
link   

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: matafuchs
a reply to: Annee

If accusations are fact, so is the title of this thread. - Trump refused nothing. It was those putting on the event who were renting the facilities.


Trump wrote the check from his charity Foundation.



So? We're going round in circles. Charities write cheques all the time, including to other charities.


If he didn't write this check (and the several other possible self-dealing situations), there would be nothing to investigate.

I'm not going 'round in circles.

I've stayed firmly planted in the same place. "check ---- self-dealing"


I know. You've been in a completely unsupported position the whole way through.
There is no evidence of self-dealing.


LOL - - - that is hilarious.



As I said , no evidence of self-dealing. Only your speculation. I am now wondering whether you even know what self-dealing is.



posted on Sep, 26 2016 @ 07:10 PM
link   

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: matafuchs
a reply to: Annee

If accusations are fact, so is the title of this thread. - Trump refused nothing. It was those putting on the event who were renting the facilities.


Trump wrote the check from his charity Foundation.



So? We're going round in circles. Charities write cheques all the time, including to other charities.


If he didn't write this check (and the several other possible self-dealing situations), there would be nothing to investigate.

I'm not going 'round in circles.

I've stayed firmly planted in the same place. "check ---- self-dealing"


I know. You've been in a completely unsupported position the whole way through.
There is no evidence of self-dealing.


LOL - - - that is hilarious.



As I said , no evidence of self-dealing. Only your speculation. I am now wondering whether you even know what self-dealing is.


It isn't my speculation.

Read the article by David Fahrenthold.



posted on Sep, 26 2016 @ 07:18 PM
link   

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: matafuchs
a reply to: Annee

If accusations are fact, so is the title of this thread. - Trump refused nothing. It was those putting on the event who were renting the facilities.


Trump wrote the check from his charity Foundation.



So? We're going round in circles. Charities write cheques all the time, including to other charities.


If he didn't write this check (and the several other possible self-dealing situations), there would be nothing to investigate.

I'm not going 'round in circles.

I've stayed firmly planted in the same place. "check ---- self-dealing"


I know. You've been in a completely unsupported position the whole way through.
There is no evidence of self-dealing.


LOL - - - that is hilarious.



As I said , no evidence of self-dealing. Only your speculation. I am now wondering whether you even know what self-dealing is.


It isn't my speculation.

Read the article by David Fahrenthold.


I don't care whose speculation it is. It's speculation nonetheless, with no evidence of self-dealing or any wrong doing.
We can all speculate. It's easy.
I'd like some details from the investigation.
edit on 26/9/2016 by UKTruth because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 26 2016 @ 07:20 PM
link   

originally posted by: 3NL1GHT3N3D1
Where are the Trump supporters making excuses for him here? Usually they'd be in full force by now deflecting to Hillary.

Trump is just as big of a sleaze ball as Clinton, there is no real "winner" this election season, both candidates are horrible people.


Fine.

Trump won't pay any country the US owes money to once he's President. Plus, he'll keep all foreign aid instead of paying it out.

The magic of Trump. It will make America great again.



posted on Sep, 26 2016 @ 07:23 PM
link   
a reply to: Annee

LOL the narrative continues, now it's YOUR speculation ALONE.

You crazy person Annee.
edit on 26-9-2016 by imjack because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 26 2016 @ 07:26 PM
link   

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: matafuchs
a reply to: Annee

If accusations are fact, so is the title of this thread. - Trump refused nothing. It was those putting on the event who were renting the facilities.


Trump wrote the check from his charity Foundation.



So? We're going round in circles. Charities write cheques all the time, including to other charities.


If he didn't write this check (and the several other possible self-dealing situations), there would be nothing to investigate.

I'm not going 'round in circles.

I've stayed firmly planted in the same place. "check ---- self-dealing"


I know. You've been in a completely unsupported position the whole way through.
There is no evidence of self-dealing.


LOL - - - that is hilarious.



As I said , no evidence of self-dealing. Only your speculation. I am now wondering whether you even know what self-dealing is.


It isn't my speculation.

Read the article by David Fahrenthold.


I don't care whose speculation it is. It's speculation nonetheless, with no evidence of self-dealing or any wrong doing.
We can all speculate. It's easy.
I'd like some details from the investigation.


Trump the Innocent.

It's been declared.



posted on Sep, 26 2016 @ 07:28 PM
link   

originally posted by: imjack
a reply to: Annee

LOL the narrative continues, now it's YOUR speculation ALONE.

You crazy person Annee.


I know. And I'm completely unsupported in my craziness.

Deny ignorance!


Oh, and here's a "goodie" from David's Twitter. Apparently, its legal to blame your lawyers and claim ignorance.
edit on 26-9-2016 by Annee because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 26 2016 @ 07:38 PM
link   

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: matafuchs
a reply to: Annee

If accusations are fact, so is the title of this thread. - Trump refused nothing. It was those putting on the event who were renting the facilities.


Trump wrote the check from his charity Foundation.



So? We're going round in circles. Charities write cheques all the time, including to other charities.


If he didn't write this check (and the several other possible self-dealing situations), there would be nothing to investigate.

I'm not going 'round in circles.

I've stayed firmly planted in the same place. "check ---- self-dealing"


I know. You've been in a completely unsupported position the whole way through.
There is no evidence of self-dealing.


LOL - - - that is hilarious.



As I said , no evidence of self-dealing. Only your speculation. I am now wondering whether you even know what self-dealing is.


It isn't my speculation.

Read the article by David Fahrenthold.


I don't care whose speculation it is. It's speculation nonetheless, with no evidence of self-dealing or any wrong doing.
We can all speculate. It's easy.
I'd like some details from the investigation.


Trump the Innocent.

It's been declared.


Probably best to take that stance until some evidence of wrong doing proves he's guilty, don't you think?

I know it's a crazy thought

edit on 26/9/2016 by UKTruth because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 26 2016 @ 07:41 PM
link   

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: matafuchs
a reply to: Annee

If accusations are fact, so is the title of this thread. - Trump refused nothing. It was those putting on the event who were renting the facilities.


Trump wrote the check from his charity Foundation.



So? We're going round in circles. Charities write cheques all the time, including to other charities.


If he didn't write this check (and the several other possible self-dealing situations), there would be nothing to investigate.

I'm not going 'round in circles.

I've stayed firmly planted in the same place. "check ---- self-dealing"


I know. You've been in a completely unsupported position the whole way through.
There is no evidence of self-dealing.


LOL - - - that is hilarious.



As I said , no evidence of self-dealing. Only your speculation. I am now wondering whether you even know what self-dealing is.


It isn't my speculation.

Read the article by David Fahrenthold.


I don't care whose speculation it is. It's speculation nonetheless, with no evidence of self-dealing or any wrong doing.
We can all speculate. It's easy.
I'd like some details from the investigation.


Trump the Innocent.

It's been declared.


Probably best to take that stance until some evidence of wrong doing prove he's guilty, don't you think?

I know it's a crazy thought


Have you ever said that about Hillary on here?

If so then cool if not why the double standard?



posted on Sep, 26 2016 @ 07:41 PM
link   
If Trumps guilty of this, then i'm God..

anyways, trusting the media to tell the truth is like believing the tooth fairy is really real. Ain't gonna happen!



posted on Sep, 26 2016 @ 07:45 PM
link   

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: matafuchs
a reply to: Annee

If accusations are fact, so is the title of this thread. - Trump refused nothing. It was those putting on the event who were renting the facilities.


Trump wrote the check from his charity Foundation.



So? We're going round in circles. Charities write cheques all the time, including to other charities.


If he didn't write this check (and the several other possible self-dealing situations), there would be nothing to investigate.

I'm not going 'round in circles.

I've stayed firmly planted in the same place. "check ---- self-dealing"


I know. You've been in a completely unsupported position the whole way through.
There is no evidence of self-dealing.


LOL - - - that is hilarious.



As I said , no evidence of self-dealing. Only your speculation. I am now wondering whether you even know what self-dealing is.


It isn't my speculation.

Read the article by David Fahrenthold.


I don't care whose speculation it is. It's speculation nonetheless, with no evidence of self-dealing or any wrong doing.
We can all speculate. It's easy.
I'd like some details from the investigation.


Trump the Innocent.

It's been declared.


Probably best to take that stance until some evidence of wrong doing proves he's guilty, don't you think?

I know it's a crazy thought


Feel free to take whatever position you want.

On this one my position is "where there's smoke there's fire"

He had to pay a penalty on the Bondi donation. That's one guilty.

Now we have 4 new situations with a similar pattern.



posted on Sep, 27 2016 @ 08:02 AM
link   
a reply to: Annee

Actually, yes they do, all the time. Do you know how many cases actually make it to court? The job of the DA is to investigate and determine if a charges need to be brought up, then they have an Assistant DA take the case to court.



posted on Sep, 27 2016 @ 09:53 AM
link   

originally posted by: raymundoko
a reply to: Annee

Actually, yes they do, all the time. Do you know how many cases actually make it to court? The job of the DA is to investigate and determine if a charges need to be brought up, then they have an Assistant DA take the case to court.



That's your response to this statement?

"IRS & NY Attorney General don't waste their time investigating nothing."



posted on Sep, 27 2016 @ 10:07 AM
link   

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: matafuchs
a reply to: Annee

If accusations are fact, so is the title of this thread. - Trump refused nothing. It was those putting on the event who were renting the facilities.


Trump wrote the check from his charity Foundation.



So? We're going round in circles. Charities write cheques all the time, including to other charities.


If he didn't write this check (and the several other possible self-dealing situations), there would be nothing to investigate.

I'm not going 'round in circles.

I've stayed firmly planted in the same place. "check ---- self-dealing"


I know. You've been in a completely unsupported position the whole way through.
There is no evidence of self-dealing.


LOL - - - that is hilarious.



As I said , no evidence of self-dealing. Only your speculation. I am now wondering whether you even know what self-dealing is.


It isn't my speculation.

Read the article by David Fahrenthold.


I don't care whose speculation it is. It's speculation nonetheless, with no evidence of self-dealing or any wrong doing.
We can all speculate. It's easy.
I'd like some details from the investigation.


Trump the Innocent.

It's been declared.


Probably best to take that stance until some evidence of wrong doing proves he's guilty, don't you think?

I know it's a crazy thought


Feel free to take whatever position you want.

On this one my position is "where there's smoke there's fire"

He had to pay a penalty on the Bondi donation. That's one guilty.

Now we have 4 new situations with a similar pattern.


I see.

So how can you vote for someone who has murdered so many people that could expose her? The charge of murder is only a theory of course, but there is certainly smoke - ergo, there must be fire, right? There are more than 4 similar patterns in this case too...

OR, you could take the stance that there is no evidence and therefore the smoke is actually blowing out of your ass.
edit on 27/9/2016 by UKTruth because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 27 2016 @ 11:09 AM
link   

originally posted by: UKTruth
OR, you could take the stance that there is no evidence and therefore the smoke is actually blowing out of your ass.


Resorting to personal attacks, thats not very becoming of you. Perhaps if you can't debate with resorting to using insults you should take a break from the forum.

On to your point, which stance do you take then. Since you are in numerous threads claiming rumour as fact yet here you are trying to have a go at someone for doing the same thing. If you want to stay consistent you should only comment on things that are proven fact.

What is a fact is that Clinton has not murdered anyone, so you are by your own account lying.

See how easy that was, you managed to debunk your own argument. Well done.



posted on Sep, 27 2016 @ 11:20 AM
link   
a reply to: raymundoko

Rarely is it about "do charges need to be brought up"..already there. It's more.. "can we get a conviction"



posted on Sep, 27 2016 @ 11:51 AM
link   

originally posted by: vonclod
a reply to: raymundoko

Rarely is it about "do charges need to be brought up"..already there. It's more.. "can we get a conviction"


I believe you first need "probable cause" (or whatever legal term applies to this situation).

Trump was fined for his donation to Pam Bondi - - the donation funds came from his charity.

There's a pattern of him using foundation money - - in a self serving manner (allegedly) - - the suspicion of behavior is there.

When people owe him money, he has it directed to his charity - - tax free. Then (allegedly) uses the tax free money for personal debts.

As he stated: "He doesn't pay taxes".



posted on Sep, 27 2016 @ 11:54 AM
link   

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: matafuchs
a reply to: Annee

If accusations are fact, so is the title of this thread. - Trump refused nothing. It was those putting on the event who were renting the facilities.


Trump wrote the check from his charity Foundation.



So? We're going round in circles. Charities write cheques all the time, including to other charities.


If he didn't write this check (and the several other possible self-dealing situations), there would be nothing to investigate.

I'm not going 'round in circles.

I've stayed firmly planted in the same place. "check ---- self-dealing"


I know. You've been in a completely unsupported position the whole way through.
There is no evidence of self-dealing.


LOL - - - that is hilarious.



As I said , no evidence of self-dealing. Only your speculation. I am now wondering whether you even know what self-dealing is.


It isn't my speculation.

Read the article by David Fahrenthold.


I don't care whose speculation it is. It's speculation nonetheless, with no evidence of self-dealing or any wrong doing.
We can all speculate. It's easy.
I'd like some details from the investigation.


Trump the Innocent.

It's been declared.


Probably best to take that stance until some evidence of wrong doing proves he's guilty, don't you think?

I know it's a crazy thought


Feel free to take whatever position you want.

On this one my position is "where there's smoke there's fire"

He had to pay a penalty on the Bondi donation. That's one guilty.

Now we have 4 new situations with a similar pattern.


I see.

So how can you vote for someone who has murdered so many people that could expose her? The charge of murder is only a theory of course, but there is certainly smoke - ergo, there must be fire, right? There are more than 4 similar patterns in this case too...


You want to talk about Hillary - - start a Hillary thread.


OR, you could take the stance that there is no evidence and therefore the smoke is actually blowing out of your ass.


There is a check.



new topics

top topics



 
65
<< 21  22  23    25 >>

log in

join