It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Trump Refused to Pay Winner of 1M Golf Contest Prize Used Charity Money to Settle

page: 14
65
<< 11  12  13    15  16  17 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Sep, 23 2016 @ 02:32 PM
link   
I love reading Trump hate, it's so amusing

It sounds like people actually think, Trump went out and changed the tee off spot, that's funny, and I love it




posted on Sep, 23 2016 @ 02:38 PM
link   

originally posted by: Deny Arrogance
Trump was obviously right.

That is why he did not have to pay the poor loser a million.

It was a charity event therefore the charity was liable for legal expenses.

It was not illegal in any way, shape or form.


There have been church fetes where the person who rolled six sixes would win a Lamborgini sports car. One time, somebody did just that and they couldn't pay out because they didn't have insurance.



posted on Sep, 23 2016 @ 03:04 PM
link   

originally posted by: thinline
I love reading Trump hate, it's so amusing

It sounds like people actually think, Trump went out and changed the tee off spot, that's funny, and I love it


No. He measured it short and created a fraud situation.

Hence, lawsuit.

Terms of lawsuit. Trump (not his charity cuz that's illegal and not his money) was required to donate to a specific charity.

You trying to make it a case of emotions or anti-Trump is ridiculous.

edit on 23-9-2016 by Annee because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 23 2016 @ 04:17 PM
link   
I really don't understand the mental gymnastics and emotional reactions. The legal agreement was for Trumps golf club to pay Greenberg's Foundation... not for the Trump Foundation to do so. It was illegal for Trump to do so, period.


Trump National Golf Club in Westchester County, N.Y., agreed to contribute $158,000 to a charity of the plaintiff's choice to settle a suit concerning a charity golf tournament held on the course in August 2010. That contribution again came from the Trump Foundation, according to tax filings.


NBC
edit on 9/23/2016 by Kali74 because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 23 2016 @ 09:32 PM
link   
a reply to: Kali74

Can you link to the laws that show what one of his companies did was Illegal? Then please explain why no charges have been brought up.
edit on 23-9-2016 by raymundoko because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 23 2016 @ 09:34 PM
link   

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: thinline
I love reading Trump hate, it's so amusing

It sounds like people actually think, Trump went out and changed the tee off spot, that's funny, and I love it


No. He measured it short and created a fraud situation.

Hence, lawsuit.

Terms of lawsuit. Trump (not his charity cuz that's illegal and not his money) was required to donate to a specific charity.

You trying to make it a case of emotions or anti-Trump is ridiculous.

First, you are wrong

There is no second.
edit on 23-9-2016 by Vector99 because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 23 2016 @ 09:34 PM
link   
a reply to: Annee

Trump was required? Nothing you have sourced has even come close to saying that...



posted on Sep, 23 2016 @ 09:38 PM
link   
a reply to: Kali74

Yea to a simpleton it might seem that way. Provide ALL OF THE DETAILS and then maybe you can consider yourself a non simpleton, but until then your thread still remains in that category of WTF why isn't this in LOL or HOAX.



posted on Sep, 23 2016 @ 09:46 PM
link   
a reply to: raymundoko

Trump was not required. His golf course was, as stipulated in the settlement. Instead, his non-profit foundation made payment. But it doesn't really matter what was stipulated.


Self-dealing is the conduct of a trustee, an attorney, a corporate officer, or other fiduciary that consists of taking advantage of his position in a transaction and acting for his own interests rather than for the interests of the beneficiaries of the trust, corporate shareholders, or his clients. Self-dealing may involve misappropriation or usurpation of corporate assets or opportunities. Self-dealing is a form of conflict of interest.

en.wikipedia.org...

The agreement specified that the golf course was to make payment. This means the money would have come out of Trump's pocket. Instead, payment was made from a non-profit, from which he gains no profit anyway. There was no benefit to the non-profit. There was indeed a benefit to Trump. Self dealing.


edit on 9/23/2016 by Phage because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 23 2016 @ 09:48 PM
link   
a reply to: Phage

You do realize you are making an assumption right now right?



posted on Sep, 23 2016 @ 09:52 PM
link   
a reply to: Vector99

Ok.

If the non-profit had...

Better? But the evidence is quite good that this is exactly what happened. And there are a number of other examples of the same sort of behavior. I would say "assumptions" about Trump's ethics are fair game.

edit on 9/23/2016 by Phage because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 23 2016 @ 09:56 PM
link   
a reply to: Phage

No. There is no date on the evidence, there is however, a timeline.

This $158,000 contribution could have been a year later and completely unrelated. I'm amazed a liberal didn't think of that.

Give me the full document. I cannot find it.



posted on Sep, 23 2016 @ 10:15 PM
link   

originally posted by: raymundoko
a reply to: Annee

Trump was required? Nothing you have sourced has even come close to saying that...



He used money from his charity.

Tell me why if it's someone else's problem, Trump used money from his charity.

Charities have public records.



posted on Sep, 23 2016 @ 10:17 PM
link   

originally posted by: Vector99

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: thinline
I love reading Trump hate, it's so amusing

It sounds like people actually think, Trump went out and changed the tee off spot, that's funny, and I love it


No. He measured it short and created a fraud situation.

Hence, lawsuit.

Terms of lawsuit. Trump (not his charity cuz that's illegal and not his money) was required to donate to a specific charity.

You trying to make it a case of emotions or anti-Trump is ridiculous.

First, you are wrong

There is no second.


Second?



posted on Sep, 23 2016 @ 10:21 PM
link   

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: raymundoko
a reply to: Annee

Trump was required? Nothing you have sourced has even come close to saying that...



He used money from his charity.

Tell me why if it's someone else's problem, Trump used money from his charity.

Charities have public records.

Show me the documents regarding this settlement, because the terms of it are specifically timestamped. I don't want your assumption or excuses, I want that freaking document.

I will also say that if you provide me that document and it shows correlation to the said payment, I will personally make the thread regarding it.

Ball in your court.



posted on Sep, 23 2016 @ 10:53 PM
link   
A $158,000 donation was made by the Trump Foundation, according to tax records.

That's a fact.

edit on 23-9-2016 by Annee because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 23 2016 @ 10:59 PM
link   

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: Vector99

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: raymundoko
a reply to: Annee

Trump was required? Nothing you have sourced has even come close to saying that...



He used money from his charity.

Tell me why if it's someone else's problem, Trump used money from his charity.

Charities have public records.

Show me the documents regarding this settlement, because the terms of it are specifically timestamped. I don't want your assumption or excuses, I want that freaking document.

I will also say that if you provide me that document and it shows correlation to the said payment, I will personally make the thread regarding it.

Ball in your court.


Read the thread. All of it.

Not my responsibility you came in late.


Seriously a cop out?

I would expect better of you.

Check the 1st page ... follow the thread... look who did that.

if you care for a discussion please acknowledge my questions.

I sparked, and re-ignited this entire thread...

Go hillary?



posted on Sep, 23 2016 @ 11:05 PM
link   

originally posted by: Vector99

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: Vector99

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: raymundoko
a reply to: Annee

Trump was required? Nothing you have sourced has even come close to saying that...



He used money from his charity.

Tell me why if it's someone else's problem, Trump used money from his charity.

Charities have public records.

Show me the documents regarding this settlement, because the terms of it are specifically timestamped. I don't want your assumption or excuses, I want that freaking document.

I will also say that if you provide me that document and it shows correlation to the said payment, I will personally make the thread regarding it.

Ball in your court.


Read the thread. All of it.

Not my responsibility you came in late.


Seriously a cop out?


Edited my post.

A $158,000 donation was made by the Trump Foundation, according to tax records. That's a fact.

It is what it is. This is not something you can twist.



posted on Sep, 23 2016 @ 11:10 PM
link   
a reply to: Annee

The date regarding this is something that is NOT determined.

The little clip shows an amount and a time stipulation.

I want to know the date and full written content of this legal document, but it seems you are cool with whatever, clip of it that might also be a falsified document, but what does it matter now?

ETA- * timestamps mean a lot in this matter btw.
edit on 23-9-2016 by Vector99 because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 23 2016 @ 11:17 PM
link   

originally posted by: Vector99
a reply to: Annee

The date regarding this is something that is NOT determined.
.


If you want to argue this, pick someone else.

I'm just not interested.



new topics

top topics



 
65
<< 11  12  13    15  16  17 >>

log in

join