It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Logarock
a reply to: imsoconfused
Come on folks......this wouldn't be a bad idea in Chicago. Not around here though, go blow Don.
originally posted by: roadgravel
Just the same as asking for lic and registration when you get stopped or is that unconstitutional too?
Driving is not covered under the Constitution.
originally posted by: Logarock
a reply to: imsoconfused
Come on folks......this wouldn't be a bad idea in Chicago. Not around here though, go blow Don.
originally posted by: Teikiatsu
Not sure if real, but even if it is I never claimed Trump was a constitutional scholar. The President has no power over local police (well, the President *shouldn't* have power over police... looking at YOU Obama and DoJ)
So who is going to stop and frisk people? The FBI?
originally posted by: WilburnRoach
originally posted by: mOjOm
a reply to: TinfoilTP
It's not a strawman because I'm not suggesting that he did say it.
It's an analogy based of your statement.
Funny that you support stop and frisk nationwide but you're worried about SJW's. You're priorities are all out of whack.
To be fair Trump isn't attracting the best and brightest among us.
originally posted by: burgerbuddy
originally posted by: Grimpachi
originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
originally posted by: Grimpachi
a reply to: TinfoilTP
originally posted by: mOjOm
a reply to: TinfoilTP
Stop and Frisk also removes Probable Cause and Violates the constitution.
No it doesn't, go tell New York City that and ask why they were able to do it.
Exactly what part of it was ruled unconstitutional do you not understand?
Center for Constitutional rights
The ruling was blocked.
The article you linked says this.
The ruling on the unconstitutionality of stop-and-frisk stands, but those changes will now be delayed pending the outcome of the city's appeal
"Basically, this court is saying to the citizens of New York, who have followed this case and who were very uplifted by the fact that a federal judge stood up to protect the rights of all citizens of the city of New York … this is the panel of the second circuit saying: 'Drop dead, New York',"
It is still ruled unconstitutional they just do not care.
Doesn't the SC decide what is unconstitutional or is that just nationwide?
What's the most simple answer?