It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Help ATS via PayPal:
learn more

UK...Lets rub their noses in diversity!

page: 1
14
<<   2  3 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Sep, 21 2016 @ 01:34 PM
link   
Recently voters in the UK voted to leave the EU by supporting the BREXIT movement. The vote was largely a backlash reaction to uncontrolled immigration. Voters felt immigration into the UK was out of control under EU membership and they wanted out!

I myself had always thought the mass immigration into the UK was simply down to lacks controls and weak laws but that is not the case.

It is the result of deliberate social engineering, a plan to permanently alter the demographics of the united kingdom that was initiated whilst under the Labour prim-minister Tony Blair. Malevolent elements that had infiltrated key positions of power during the leadership of Tony Blair said "lets rub their noses in diversity".

Its no coincidence that the UK immigration policy gives priority to immigrants who are less desirable, less likely to seek work more likely to be involved in crime and corruption. The country has been marked for destruction, not destruction by bombs or bullets but destruction by immigration.


Labour threw open Britain's borders to mass immigration to help socially engineer a "truly multicultural" country, a former Government adviser has revealed.




The huge increases in migrants over the last decade were partly due to a politically motivated attempt by ministers to radically change the country and "rub the Right's nose in diversity", according to Andrew Neather, a former adviser to Tony Blair, Jack Straw and David Blunkett. He said Labour's relaxation of controls was a deliberate plan to "open up the UK to mass migration" but that ministers were nervous and reluctant to discuss such a move publicly for fear it would alienate its "core working class vote".




The "deliberate policy", from late 2000 until "at least February last year", when the new points based system was introduced, was to open up the UK to mass migration, he said.




the "major shift" in immigration policy came after the publication of a policy paper from the Performance and Innovation Unit, a Downing Street think tank based in the Cabinet Office, in 2001.




"Many have long suspected that mass immigration under Labour was not just a cock up but also a conspiracy. They were right.


www.telegraph.co.uk...



Above Jonathan Portes former Team leader of the Performance and Innovation Unit under Labours Tony Blair.

Jonathan Portes a speech-writer for Gordon Brown and senior aide to Cabinet Secretary Gus O’Donnell was team leader of the PIU which planned the uncontrolled immigration into the UK and its implemented under Tony Blair's leadership.

He is the director of the National Institute of Economic and Social Research, a globalist think tank in Westminster which promotes mass immigration and was originally founded with backing from the Rockefeller Foundation. Portes is a dual-national holding both British and American citizenship; working inside the treasury departments of both governments, he was also involved with the International Monetary Fund from 1998 to 1999.

Portes was a prominent adviser under the New Labour regime, associated with Gus O’Donnell and Tony Blair, promoting open borders under pseudo-“economic” rationales. Portes is a member of the Rothschild-beholden Council on Foreign Relations.

www.dailymotion.com...

So there you have it Rockefeller government infiltration at the highest levels aimed with the social engineering and the destruction of the of the UK through uncontrolled immigration. The media are totally in on this also who attempt mass brainwashing the public through preprogramed political correctness.
edit on 21-9-2016 by zinc12 because: (no reason given)




posted on Sep, 21 2016 @ 01:46 PM
link   
Its whats pisses me off.

Im all for immigration.

But the the UK seems to let the dregs in while keeping the best out.

EU was the perfect opportunity for blair to let in millions of unskilled labour we didn't need.

And then there are the hundreds of thousands of middle east immigrants.

Meanwhile I have a high qualified freind in venezuela. She wants to be a spanish teacher and she cant get in.......and the UK has Shortage of modern language teachers.....

Rather let one of her in than 20 unskilled Pakistanis


The UK has a nurse and doctor shortage. Why are we letting in unskilled Nigerians when there are doctors and nurses in Asia desperate to come over?



edit on 21-9-2016 by crazyewok because: (no reason given)

edit on 21-9-2016 by crazyewok because: (no reason given)

edit on 21-9-2016 by crazyewok because: (no reason given)

edit on 21-9-2016 by crazyewok because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 21 2016 @ 01:48 PM
link   
a reply to: zinc12

And, of course, the people who do this are the ones who live behind gates and with security details and don't have to suffer the consequences of it.
It wouldn`t surprise me at all to see something similar in a policy outline here in the states.



posted on Sep, 21 2016 @ 01:52 PM
link   
a reply to: ketsuko

Heres a deal.

How about the UK take 100,000 Mexicans from you in exchange we give you 50,000 middle east immigrants?



posted on Sep, 21 2016 @ 01:53 PM
link   
Going along with your OP premise that this mass uncontrolled immigration was intentionally planned for some secret reason, we need to ask just how many levels of secrecy are we talking here? Seems to me to also be some sort of half-a$$ed attempt by TPTB to "appease" the Middle East for all the destruction and killing that has been done by the western powers over the past 30 years. Like a heroin addict pleading with it's dealer for an extension or another hit of stuff. The dealer is in the position to make them do whatever they want. I can imagine the twisted logic for that being discussed, and the demands by the Saudi government to make it happen, or we get no oil "fix". Do I have proof, no, speculation yes, but it sure seems plausible IMO.



posted on Sep, 21 2016 @ 01:54 PM
link   
a reply to: zinc12

For me personally and the few that I've spoken to immigration had very little if anything to do with why we voted out and by the way I'd vote out again even if I had a vision of what the world would be like afterwards. I voted out because the EU is becoming a darker version of what it should have been, the original concept of the EU in basic terms was to be a collection of European countries who would do trade with no taxes, they would defend one another and ensure a better life for all people but it has become too powerful. The EU demands it's laws be followed, that it's courts can over ride the decisions of the courts of any member state, (member state annoys me as well by the way) we can check but not deny people into the country no matter their background, we are fined when our country is doing better than others (by fine I mean give more money to the EU) which makes our country poorer and the suits in the EU richer, we cannot out vote those in charge because they are appointed and not voted in.

But for me the biggest issue was when it comes to terrorism the EU seems to be allowing it rather than doing anything to stop it. They have open boarders, no checks, and now they are talking or at least have been talking about an EU army taking over for all countries armies and those countries would put an end to their army and that should scare the little mars bars out of everyone. A system like the EU that has a power hungry ideal with an army of what would be hundreds of thousands possibly millions is dangerous and something that certain people (Hitler mostly) wanted to happen of course under German control (Merkel is about to lose but still Germany will still be the most powerful country in the EU).

Oh and also Cameron made the mistake of calling in Obama, Cameron thought that Obama was as loved over here as he was in the States which isn't true and then Obama, decided to try and TELL US what to do and threatened us with the whole "back of the line" comment and if there is one thing you don't do you never threaten an Englishmen (including Scots and Ireland) to get what you want because we'll naturally go the opposite way.



posted on Sep, 21 2016 @ 01:56 PM
link   

originally posted by: crazyewok
a reply to: ketsuko

Heres a deal.

How about the UK take 100,000 Mexicans from you in exchange we give you 50,000 middle east immigrants?


Aside from the violence, the overall demographics aren't. Comparable education and everything else. And cheer up! If we elect Hillary, we'll be flooded with Middle Easterners too. She's prmised as much, andin the meantime Obama is importing as many as he can. But if you think Mexicans are the only folks coming in over that Southern border, you're folling yourself. Anyone who wants to sneak in to this country comes in there, including you Europeans!
edit on 21-9-2016 by ketsuko because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 21 2016 @ 01:57 PM
link   

originally posted by: Dwoodward85
there is one thing you don't do you never threaten an Englishmen (including Scots and Ireland) to get what you want because we'll naturally go the opposite way.


Especially if there American , Argentian, or german


I would say french but we honestly dont care what they say one way or the other

edit on 21-9-2016 by crazyewok because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 21 2016 @ 02:03 PM
link   
Americans are supposed to grin are bare it so can the uk.



posted on Sep, 21 2016 @ 02:11 PM
link   
a reply to: Krakatoa

The middle east does mighty fine with the destruction and killing on it's own. It really doesn't need Western Help.



posted on Sep, 21 2016 @ 02:14 PM
link   

originally posted by: thinline
a reply to: Krakatoa

The middle east does mighty fine with the destruction and killing on it's own. It really doesn't need Western Help.





I agree, 100%. But that does not mean that western "leaders" don't bow down to the Saudi's like an addict in withdrawal. When in that position, you apologize for anything, regardless if it makes sense, just to get that next fix. The west is hooked on ME oil, that is a fact.



posted on Sep, 21 2016 @ 02:16 PM
link   
a reply to: crazyewok
Its crazy there are skilled workers from America, Canada, South Africa, new Zealand and Australia who are given a hard time by immigration policy's initiated under Tony Blair. Yet we see unskilled and often corrupt peoples are given easy access whilst the media does its part by brainwashing the public into acceptance.



posted on Sep, 21 2016 @ 02:18 PM
link   

originally posted by: Bluntone22
Americans are supposed to grin are bare it so can the uk.


How many times larger is America then the UK again?



posted on Sep, 21 2016 @ 02:36 PM
link   

originally posted by: zinc12

Its no coincidence that the UK immigration policy gives priority to immigrants who are less desirable, less likely to seek work more likely to be involved in crime and corruption. The country has been marked for destruction, not destruction by bombs or bullets but destruction by immigration.


That is your own observation I take it, since there seems no mention in the link.



posted on Sep, 21 2016 @ 02:38 PM
link   
a reply to: zinc12




The vote was largely a backlash reaction to uncontrolled immigration. Voters felt immigration into the UK was out of control under EU membership and they wanted out!

funny, when you point out syria isn't part of the eu, and wanting a minority out is racist, the claim is they voted for democracy.
we now how the unelected theresa may running the country, and you still have to put up with black people on the bus...



posted on Sep, 21 2016 @ 02:42 PM
link   
a reply to: stinkelbaum

Actually you dont vote for prime ministers in the UK.

You vote for MP's and they form a government.

So in effect you vote for a party not a individual pm.

So technically if not morally May is elected.



posted on Sep, 21 2016 @ 02:42 PM
link   

originally posted by: zinc12

originally posted by: Bluntone22
Americans are supposed to grin are bare it so can the uk.


How many times larger is America then the UK again?


About ten million illegals bigger.



posted on Sep, 21 2016 @ 03:00 PM
link   
a reply to: zinc12



Recently voters in the UK voted to leave the EU by supporting the BREXIT movement. The vote was largely a backlash reaction to uncontrolled immigration.


It wasn't all about the immigration. Millions of people have been against 'EU interference' for decades. There's always been a sense of stupid laws and legislation adding to the costs of small businesses. More importantly was the impression of being ruled by foreigners from overseas. That's really what the BREXIT was about and the immigration concerns would be secondary to those concerns of sovereignty.




It is the result of deliberate social engineering, a plan permanently alter the demographics of the united kingdom that was initiated whilst under the Labour prim-minister Tony Blair.


It's not proven that anyone is 'deliberately social engineering' the UK to alter the demographics. We've invited migrants from the Caribbean (see Windrush) when we needed them and we've relied heavily on professionals from India and Pakistan in our doctor's surgeries and hospitals. We invited them because we needed them and some parts of the population didn't like it. See 'rivers of blood' speech.

We had a large wave of East Europeans in the late 90s and early 2000s. Not because Tony Blair had a 'plan' but because EU membership made the free movement of travel possible. What was the popular reaction? "Polish coming here stealing our jobs" and "Schools collapsing with E European migrants." Rags like the Sun and Express ran stories about how dirty and criminal they were. I remember headlines about Polish and Czech migrants eating dogs and swans - hysteria.



The media are totally in on this also who attempt mass brainwashing the public through preprogramed political correctness.


Are you kidding? Are you British? Telegraph, Sun, Star, Express, Mail are the biggest selling newspapers in the UK and they are all 100% anti-immigration with the tabloids actively 'brainwashing the public' to think immigrants are criminals, sex offenders, beggars and problems to society.

They were the same in the 1950s and 60s with the invited Caribbean migrants and the same with the India influx of the 1970s. Same with the Polish/Czechs/Slovaks and now the same with Muslim refugees and immigrants.

You've gone from Blair to an aide to some top-level Rockefeller conspiracy without offering any context or historical background.



posted on Sep, 21 2016 @ 03:11 PM
link   
There are a few issues being mixed together here, and they're really separate things. I'll try to keep this short, so hopefully not TL;DR. But if you have to have a 'take home' from this, it's that the Telegraph article that's being quoted here is a deceptive piece of writing from a pro-Tory (anti-Labour) paper.

Neather's admissions are surprising but sadly not shocking. Blair may have set the process in motion that partially led to the current mess, but he didn't foresee that outcome (whether he even thought it through at all is another debate).

The Telegraph piece fails to mention that Britain already had open EU borders when Blair took office in 1997. So he didn't create that situation (it was in the Maastricht Treaty of 1992 if anyone cares). Uncontrolled immigration was taking place from EU nations when Blair was elected.

What Blair did was to refuse to apply a transitional period of controlled immigration when Poland and all the other second-rate European nations acceded to the EU in 2004. He was legally entitled to do this, but didn't.

What he didn't foresee was the financial crash of 2008, which more or less wrecked the economies of the Eastern European nations that had just signed up. And because there was no interim control, there was mass migration from those newly-impoverished nations. Poland, for example, still has around ten per cent unemployment as a result, which is why over a million Poles have arrived in Britain looking for work (this is also why Poland is making such a fuss about them staying in Britain! Their concern is not sentimental, but economic).

Yes, Blair effectively refused to partially close a door that was already wide open, but he didn't have any greater vision than proving that the leftist utopia of a modern multiculural nation was A Good Thing. It went very badly pear-shaped. Rather like Iraq. Blair's policy of handing over responsibility to the God he believes in so strongly has not proved wise, to put it mildly.

Immigration from outside the EU is another matter. The UK has had strict controls for several years now, in the form of a stringent Australian-style points-based system. Getting into Britain via official immigration processes is a genuine ordeal and it has slowed non-EU immigration to a trickle.

The third factor in all this is refugees. This is completely separate from EU and non-EU immigration. All you need to know is the following:

1) If someone comes to Britain via unofficial means, they have the opportunity to seek asylum. If they do not, they will be deported.
2) If that person applies for asylum, they will be detained to prevent absconding while their claim is processed. At this stage they are officially an asylum seeker. If their claim fails, they will be deported.
3) Finally, if that person's asylum claim is accepted, they become a refugee and are allowed to stay in Britain. However, constraints are placed on their liberty and as a result life as a refugee in Britain is so bleak that anyone would have to be fleeing some seriously unpleasant sh# in their home country to want to get here, and to want to stay once they've succeeded in claiming asylum.



posted on Sep, 21 2016 @ 03:12 PM
link   
a reply to: zinc12

Man...that hair...




top topics



 
14
<<   2  3 >>

log in

join