It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: introvert
originally posted by: jadedANDcynical
a reply to: introvert
Youtube votes or comments are in no way, shape or form an accurate way to judge support.
Of course not:
There's absolutely no weight behind the fact that Trump has ten times the number of people viewing his speech.
If Hillary had the actual support her campaign purports there to be, she should have more viewers than Trump, or at least as many.
We are talking about an order of magnitude fewer viewers of her message. That's not chump change.
It the middle of the afternoon. Most people are at work.
Are you actually going to make the case that youtube views are a good way to judge support?
Your beloved queen has zero support and you know it
You can come on here and argue all you want but your not changing anyones mind, the facts speak for themselves.
You're damage control posts on here are pathetic.
57 Likes and 515 Dislikes at this point lol.
Are you actually going to make the case that politicians do not use youtube as a means to gauge support?
originally posted by: butcherguy
At the very end of her speech, Hillary's left eye crosses hard to the right while the other is looking straight ahead.
The point at which it happens is when she is saying 'Love trumps hate'.
ETA: Looking at the video linked in the OP, it occurs at 1:25:06 and again at 1:25:15 (approximately)
originally posted by: butcherguy
At the very end of her speech, Hillary's left eye crosses hard to the right (towards her right eye) while the right eye is looking straight ahead.
The point at which it happens is when she is saying 'Love trumps hate'.
ETA: Looking at the video linked in the OP, it occurs at 1:25:06 and again at 1:25:15 (approximately)
originally posted by: interupt42
a reply to: introvert
I do not support Clinton
Out of curiosity why don't you Support Clinton?
originally posted by: introvert
originally posted by: jadedANDcynical
a reply to: introvert
Youtube votes or comments are in no way, shape or form an accurate way to judge support.
Of course not:
There's absolutely no weight behind the fact that Trump has ten times the number of people viewing his speech.
If Hillary had the actual support her campaign purports there to be, she should have more viewers than Trump, or at least as many.
We are talking about an order of magnitude fewer viewers of her message. That's not chump change.
It the middle of the afternoon. Most people are at work.
Are you actually going to make the case that youtube views are a good way to judge support?
originally posted by: sirlancelot
originally posted by: introvert
originally posted by: jadedANDcynical
a reply to: introvert
Youtube votes or comments are in no way, shape or form an accurate way to judge support.
Of course not:
There's absolutely no weight behind the fact that Trump has ten times the number of people viewing his speech.
If Hillary had the actual support her campaign purports there to be, she should have more viewers than Trump, or at least as many.
We are talking about an order of magnitude fewer viewers of her message. That's not chump change.
It the middle of the afternoon. Most people are at work.
Are you actually going to make the case that youtube views are a good way to judge support?
Who cares she sucks and anyone that supports her sucks too! Why? Because no matter how bad the other alternatives are she is 10X worse.
originally posted by: ColaTesla
a reply to: introvert
I do believe she has the experience and temperament to do the job much more effectively than Trump, but I will not give her my vote.
Then why are you defending the indefensible in this thread??