Holywood Pedo Ring about to be exposed?

a reply to: MuonToGluon

Wow Phage, i never thought you'd make an alias just to get your point across. But well done anyways.

I'm no alias, infact I gave my real name out in one of my recent posts; it would not be hard to find my fb profile.

originally posted by: Conluceo
a reply to: MongolianPaellaFish

That's fine bud, you have no idea how protected these people are and how high this pedo conspiracy goes.

I haven't seen any evidence of a paedophile conspiracy at all.

a reply to: MongolianPaellaFish

Then you're free to go about your life. It will not change anything for you.

a reply to: lakenheath24

Oh cool, someone posted it - I can't post yet.

I actually spent a couple days digging, here is what I have.

Backstory.

On the filming of Lucas, Haim was raped by someone. He fell into drugs as a way of coping with the trauma. Corey Feldman was very good friends with Haim, and after Haims death, around 2012, Feldman promised to release a tell-all book, which included the names of his and Haims abusers. For whatever reason, he redacted the names before releasing the book. FastForward slightly, almost immediately after not releasing the names...He get's a part in a movie. Now he has been in movies (albeit # movies) consistently throughout all of this, so him getting a part isn't a big deal, HOWEVER...(The following is not fact, but a theory, I will write another note when back to facts)

...It was how they treated him like a king that leaves a bad taste in my mouth. Not because of the treatment in and of itself, it's the reason behind the treatment. Why did they treat him so well? They had him on a ton of talk shows, talking up this war type movie, that honestly looked horrible (to myself.) - Anyway, what I think happened is an agreement or appeasement of the potential threat (Feldman). They play him up as some godlike actor, and he drops it. He gets fame, etc all over again. I don't think Feldman was able to keep that promise, as he continuously made vague statements through twitter and continued his crusade against pedophiles - as this happens, he drops from spotlight again.

Back to fact.



The current consensus is that it is one of 5ish people.

Nick Cage, Steven Spielberg, John Travolta, Charlie Sheen, and Brad Pitt.

Now, according to Feldman, it's an A-lister, who is living a family-man facade.

So initially, people ruled out Cage, and Sheen. They are not the 'family-man' type, nor do they pretend to be.



but Feldman stated in an interview

"Well I have to be completely honest and say, I'm not a huge fan of Charlie Sheen. I don't make it my goal to ever talk badly in the press, we're all in it together, that's the way I look at it, but Charlie in particular, especially the way that he's affected other people that I know — point blank, Charlie and Corey started their careers pretty much together, and Corey fought for his entire life to recover from those early experiences and to get his life together"


So now let's think back to the two people ruled out, more specifically, Charlie sheen.

When he divorced from his wife, his wife gave a testimony against him, that he had visited porn sites which appeared to have underage people. When confronted, Sheen threatened her (multiple times, multiple occasions). One that stands out, "You'll never make it to the hearing".

He is known for domestic abuse. Which again, goes against everything Feldman said, but...let's remember, Feldman is a victim. To feldman, I would imagine, from his point of view, if his friends abuser, or his own, has a wife, or kids, then they fall under "Family-man". Remember, this person destroyed his friends life, any sort of family, even if was just a wife, would look like, to the victim, a family-man.

I think, if anyone is named, it'll be Sheen. The fact that the article states "Hollywood is sick of this person" - probably has less to do with the pedophilia, and more to do with him being unable to work in Hollywood anymore. (At least not without major issues, he has been acting like a diva past couple years. Lost his job on Two and a half men, announced that he had aids, etc.)

Although Cage, Cruise, and Travolta often come up, I can't find any good reason for it other than the fact that they are big stars around whom rumors swirl. I don't see any direct connection between any of these guys and Haim.

Sheen, on the other hand, worked directly with Haim.

I'd also like to see the rest of this nefarious gang of abusers outed.

warning


youtu.be...



I think most actors know what is going on and choose to remain silent.

a reply to: Stormdancer777

That documentary covers Brian Singer, and some other homosexual pedophiles.

Very limited, and was contained to one household. It is also limited in that it doesn't shed light on how these things work. Basically, it tries to create order of chaos, and I think that is a common trait when people talk about pedophilia.

Ever notice how every pedophile they ever catch is part of a pedophile "ring"?

The guy who sold his daughter, part of a ring (Makes sense in this usage).

The guy who downloaded a video. Part of a ring. (Wait...what?)

The guy who bought illegal videos. Part of a ring. (Even though all he did was enter in his CC number and then waited).

Ring, ring ring. It means nothing. All it means, is that someone else made the material, posted it online, and another person viewed it. By our current standards, both of those people are part of a pedophile ring.

The only time it isn't a ring (in news), is when an adult rapes a child and doesn't share the information or video/pictures with anyone. Then it is just child rapist, or pedophile. No ring. I bring this up, because I think the pedophile at the end of the documentary is right, it's not some big secret conspiracy, no. Instead, it is crimes of circumstance, as opposed to being this huge operation where your neighbor is part of this international ring (AKA, an illegal site used by people of multiple nationalities, who never had contact with each other...)

It almost sounds like I'm saying be easier on the pedophiles, but I'm not. I'm saying news/media should report it as is, and not allude to things grander than actuality.

As I recall, the case against Singer was dropped because the guy bringing the charges turned out to be a fraud. Although, to be fair, several Singer movies have made me feel intellectually violated.