It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Reddit post apparently related to Clintons email coverup

page: 33
154
<< 30  31  32    34  35  36 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Sep, 25 2016 @ 02:57 PM
link   
a reply to: IAMTAT

I'd be feeling a lot better, if the Oversight Committee already subpoenaed Reddit's records and had a hearing with Comey scheduled.

These are the only avenues I see that can realistically be expected to move this new evidence forward.

I'd like to think Combetta understands his safety depends on spilling his guts 'on the record' to Congress. If he pleads the 5th or doesn't show up, eventually 'they' will clean up that loose end. Not now, when it's obvious...but I bet he would be 'taken care of' before Hillary starts campaigning for a second term. (Yes, I still think she is going to be foisted on us, no matter what.)




posted on Sep, 25 2016 @ 02:57 PM
link   
Remember Sandy Berger?---Got off with a slap on the wrist from Comey---for removing and destroying government documents from the National Archives which may have harmed the Clintons?

Turns out, according to released Clinton emails, Berger was advising HRC while she was Secretary of State.

Berger was also a law partner with Loretta Lynch and Cheryl Mills at Hogan & Hartson.



Several messages found stored on one of Clinton’s private email servers showed that Berger – a convicted thief of classified documents with a revoked classification license – had been advising Clinton while she served as secretary of state and had access to emails containing classified information.

For example, in an email dated Sept. 22, 2009, Berger advised Clinton of how she could leverage information to make Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu more cooperative in discussions with the Obama administration over a settlement freeze.

By the way Abu Mazen who was mentioned in Berger’s classified e-mail is actually Mahmoud Abbas the Palestinian terrorist who planned the 1972 Munich massacre and who is the head of the PLO.

Oh! You want more?
Okay, a Washington Law firm ties Berger, Lynch, Mills together. Berger worked as a partner in the Washington law firm Hogan & Hartson from 1973 to 1977, before taking a position as the deputy director of policy planning at the State Department in the Carter administration.


thebottomlineat.blogspot.com...



posted on Sep, 25 2016 @ 04:05 PM
link   
Given Obama may have been communicating with Hillary using a pseudonym it's no wonder this has been completely shut down by the DOJ and FBI.
Makes total sense why everyone involved was given immunity and records were redacted or hidden.
edit on 25/9/2016 by UKTruth because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 25 2016 @ 06:24 PM
link   

originally posted by: MotherMayEye

originally posted by: IAMTAT
a reply to: MotherMayEye

CNN and Politico are not the ONLY ones ignoring the 'StoneTear' story.

WHY is DRUDGE blatantly ignoring it?


I'll be honest, I question Drudge. If Drudge is ignoring it, then I tend to think it's a definitely a story the Clintons can find no good use for.

(Also, I read someone say, the other day, that Drudge had it up. When I went to go check it out though, it wasn't there.)


One interesting thought from Twitter...regarding 'StoneTear' not having been reported on Drudge thus far:



Follow Scott W. Somerville ‏@XnHealthShare @Deplorable4L -- IF Drudge has been quiet so that Trump can drop #stonetear bomb at the debate, this will be the biggest setup in history 4:12 PM - 25 Sep 2016

twitter.com...

Personally,...with 100M viewers...I'd love to see Trump drop 'StoneTear' on Hillary at the Debate!
edit on 25-9-2016 by IAMTAT because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 25 2016 @ 06:46 PM
link   

originally posted by: IAMTAT

originally posted by: MotherMayEye

originally posted by: IAMTAT
a reply to: MotherMayEye

CNN and Politico are not the ONLY ones ignoring the 'StoneTear' story.

WHY is DRUDGE blatantly ignoring it?


I'll be honest, I question Drudge. If Drudge is ignoring it, then I tend to think it's a definitely a story the Clintons can find no good use for.

(Also, I read someone say, the other day, that Drudge had it up. When I went to go check it out though, it wasn't there.)


One interesting thought from Twitter...regarding 'StoneTear' not having been reported on Drudge thus far:



Follow Scott W. Somerville ‏@XnHealthShare @Deplorable4L -- IF Drudge has been quiet so that Trump can drop #stonetear bomb at the debate, this will be the biggest setup in history 4:12 PM - 25 Sep 2016

twitter.com...

Personally,...with 100M viewers...I'd love to see Trump drop 'StoneTear' on Hillary at the Debate!


I said early in this thread it would be a great debate question!

However, it would be more effective if everyone knew what the heII he was talking about though, if he brings up 'Stonetear.' I don't see Drudge serving any purpose by not circulating the story.

I don't trust Drudge.



posted on Sep, 25 2016 @ 06:51 PM
link   

originally posted by: MotherMayEye

originally posted by: IAMTAT

originally posted by: MotherMayEye

originally posted by: IAMTAT
a reply to: MotherMayEye

CNN and Politico are not the ONLY ones ignoring the 'StoneTear' story.

WHY is DRUDGE blatantly ignoring it?


I'll be honest, I question Drudge. If Drudge is ignoring it, then I tend to think it's a definitely a story the Clintons can find no good use for.

(Also, I read someone say, the other day, that Drudge had it up. When I went to go check it out though, it wasn't there.)


One interesting thought from Twitter...regarding 'StoneTear' not having been reported on Drudge thus far:



Follow Scott W. Somerville ‏@XnHealthShare @Deplorable4L -- IF Drudge has been quiet so that Trump can drop #stonetear bomb at the debate, this will be the biggest setup in history 4:12 PM - 25 Sep 2016

twitter.com...

Personally,...with 100M viewers...I'd love to see Trump drop 'StoneTear' on Hillary at the Debate!


I said early in this thread it would be a great debate question!

However, it would be more effective if everyone knew what the heII he was talking about though, if he brings up 'Stonetear.' I don't see Drudge serving any purpose by not circulating the story.

I don't trust Drudge.


Might come out on Monday morning on Drudge...or, IF Trumps hit's her w/"StoneTear" in front of 100 million viewers...and she plays ignorant...EVERYONE will be asking about it..MSM can't possibly ignore them.



posted on Sep, 25 2016 @ 07:01 PM
link   
a reply to: IAMTAT

I would love if it came up in the debate.

I remember Hillary bringing up Tony Rezko to Obama in a debate. It caused me to go look up what it was all about...even though I really had to dig to find the story. I doubt most people bothered to look it up though. If it's not spoonfed to them, then it doesn't resonate. In one ear and out the other.

This Reddit story is actually huge though. Congress is taking action on it.

All the major networks should have a few stories on what's gone on so far. Obviously, the public has a great interest...not just because Congress is acting on it...not just because it involves the Democratic nominee for POTUS...but because 'little people' -- the public -- did something the FBI failed to do.

The FBI should have had this evidence if they were handing out immunity in exchange for info, genuinely investigating, and sincerely gathering facts & evidence.

This Reddit story is so damning to the FBI. I think that's what has them all scrambling, right now: The FBI is implicated in a half-assed investigation and/or possibly caught colluding in a cover up.



posted on Sep, 25 2016 @ 07:06 PM
link   
After it breaks...I'd love to see Trump bring up on stage at a rally, 'Katica'---the millennial Trump supporter who ferreted out the 'StoneTear' story...that the FBI failed to find.



posted on Sep, 25 2016 @ 07:20 PM
link   
a reply to: IAMTAT

I love 'Katica.' I don't hold out much hope that the GIGANTIC story she uncovered will get the attention it deserves. They can't let a mere 'peon' get the best of them. I feel especially protective of 'Katica' -- because I relate to her experience.

** *

You know I believe I uncovered something important once, TAT.

And I was pushed to share it with Trump. Instead of uttering even one word about it...he changed the conversation entirely. He had all the information he needed to prove Obama/Factcheck peddled a fraudulent document. But, he took all eyes off of that story -- and I was getting 10,000 hits a day on my blog, at the time. I will always know that Trump ran interference for Obama. VERY effectively.

From the moment Trump demanded Obama release his long form birth certificate, to today, anyone interested in what was really behind the Obama birth certificate controversy has only had eyes for the long form bc.

I can't trust Trump. He and Jerome Corsi lied to me...they wanted to be in control of my research...then they undermined it.

I don't expect anyone to believe me, or care, or be impressed, or moved by my story. But I know what happened. And I know Trump is not who he claims to be, right now.

We'll see if Trump touches this or not...or if he destroys the story entirely in one way or another.



posted on Sep, 25 2016 @ 07:55 PM
link   
a reply to: MotherMayEye

I understand your feelings. How Trump handles this will tell us all a great deal.



posted on Sep, 25 2016 @ 07:55 PM
link   
This whole #StoneTear thing is really an odd beast, isn't it?

The hashtag is still pretty active on twitter, it's gotten the account I'm using a few followers (a few of which have huge followings) and I'm even getting some retweets of the stuff I put out.

Hillary is absolutely being destroyed on Twitter, she's still getting hit with Powells' #d**kingbimbos and nearly every other political hashtag when directed at Hillary is being used to show her up.

Hillary's campaign has produced a plethora of tweetable and memeable material; and the Internet hath provided. I almost feel bad for her. The anti-Trump stuff is nothing compared to the anti-Hillary product. She's certainly loosing the memewar.

I eagerly anticipate the next bit of info that gets dropped of strategy of Hillary's that gets co-opted.



posted on Sep, 25 2016 @ 08:04 PM
link   

originally posted by: IAMTAT
a reply to: MotherMayEye

I understand your feelings. How Trump handles this will tell us all a great deal.


I am glad you said that. I know it doesn't matter to you or a few other people that I don't support Trump. You just seem to appreciateanyone willing to look at Hillary critically. I do! But I was feeling kind of guilty after I typed that, so thanks for understanding.

If Trump is effective with this story -- and I think he should pummel Hillary with it -- I'll be happy.

Hillary needs to be asked -- again & again -- if she ever asked Combetta or anyone to look into tampering with the email addresses in that archive. Actually, I can think of several questions I'd ask her to try and get her response on record.


edit on 25-9-2016 by MotherMayEye because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 25 2016 @ 08:25 PM
link   
Remember, too, if anything Hillary says, which is recorded or transcribed, is false, then it can be used as evidence against her -- thanks to a hearsay exception.

Lying under oath is not the only way to use 'false exculpatory statements' as evidence of consciousness of guilt.

By the way, I looked up those hearsay exception rules after Gowdy questioned Comey at his oversight hearing. But I was not confident that Gowdy got that point across. Hillary's public and recorded false exculpatory statements are admissible as evidence of intent.

Hillary needs to be grilled, ON THE PUBLIC RECORD, about all of this.



posted on Sep, 25 2016 @ 08:40 PM
link   
Ug!!!

Tomorrow, at the debate, would be a perfect time to shoot a few questions to Hillary about this. In fact, it's the only opportunity to try to get her on record with anything BEFORE Combetta's hearing on Tuesday.

Trump better confront her with this because the moderator won't.

I mean, I doubt Combetta will answer any questions, on Tuesday, but if he can muster any sense of self-preservation, he will insist to his lawyers that he show up, tell them he doesn't want to risk contempt charges, promise to plead the 5th, and then spill his guts completely.

If he hasn't left this option available to himself...then I think he has seriously underestimated the Clintons. They will not allow him to be a threat four years from now.
edit on 25-9-2016 by MotherMayEye because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 26 2016 @ 05:15 AM
link   
I heard about this updates today morning. Anyway i think it is good to conjoining both of them. Let us wait and see the new changes.
Essay Writing Service



posted on Sep, 26 2016 @ 07:49 AM
link   

originally posted by: jadedANDcynical
a reply to: IAMTAT

This is interesting, from your link:


If you need to control who gets to email the vip, just set up stringent spam filtering where only whitelisted people or people the vip has emailed are allowed.

EDIT: Apparently I was involved in a Hilary thing. Sadly I completely mis-understood the OP's request and provided incorrect information. Thanks for the gold though!


When was this edited in?




[–]brkdncr
1 point 2 years ago*
If you need to control who gets to email the vip, just set up stringent spam filtering where only whitelisted people or people the vip has emailed are allowed.

EDIT: Apparently I was involved in a Hilary thing. Sadly I completely mis-understood the OP's request and provided incorrect information. Thanks for the gold though!

www.reddit.com...

Just an FYI long shot:
The newly-released (and name-redacted) FBI document from a Clinton I.T....referring to the "Hilary coverup"---ALSO spells 'Hilary' with ONE 'L'.
Coincidence?
pbs.twimg.com...:large

I wonder if Pagliano is into break dancing! (brkdncr on Reddit)




edit on 26-9-2016 by IAMTAT because: Quote added



edit on 26-9-2016 by IAMTAT because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 26 2016 @ 07:54 AM
link   
Related segment from Sunday's FNC Special Report w/ Brett Baier:



Also related, FBI Director Comey to appear before the House Judiciary Committee on Wednesday Sep 28th:

judiciary.house.gov...



posted on Sep, 26 2016 @ 08:47 AM
link   

originally posted by: JacKatMtn
Also related, FBI Director Comey to appear before the House Judiciary Committee on Wednesday Sep 28th:

judiciary.house.gov...



*whew*




posted on Sep, 26 2016 @ 08:59 AM
link   

originally posted by: IAMTAT

originally posted by: jadedANDcynical
a reply to: IAMTAT

This is interesting, from your link:


If you need to control who gets to email the vip, just set up stringent spam filtering where only whitelisted people or people the vip has emailed are allowed.

EDIT: Apparently I was involved in a Hilary thing. Sadly I completely mis-understood the OP's request and provided incorrect information. Thanks for the gold though!


When was this edited in?




[–]brkdncr
1 point 2 years ago*
If you need to control who gets to email the vip, just set up stringent spam filtering where only whitelisted people or people the vip has emailed are allowed.

EDIT: Apparently I was involved in a Hilary thing. Sadly I completely mis-understood the OP's request and provided incorrect information. Thanks for the gold though!

www.reddit.com...

Just an FYI long shot:
The newly-released (and name-redacted) FBI document from a Clinton I.T....referring to the "Hilary coverup"---ALSO spells 'Hilary' with ONE 'L'.
Coincidence?
pbs.twimg.com...:large

I wonder if Pagliano is into break dancing! (brkdncr on Reddit)






If brkdncr on Reddit is Pagliano.....
He is very brazen or knows that NO ONE will be called to answer for these things under the law.
I bet it is the latter.



posted on Sep, 26 2016 @ 09:01 AM
link   
a reply to: IAMTAT

A very interesting and astute observation.

Will be looking for any follow up.

For any interested, I have a thread up about the Oversight Committee meeting regarding Comey being brought in.

From Chairman Goodlatte:


It defies logic and the law that she faces no consequences for jeopardizing national security. It also appears that Secretary Clinton may have perjured herself and made false statements to Congress under oath. I’ve called on the Justice Department to investigate her for perjury and am interested to hear from Director Comey on the matter.



new topics

top topics



 
154
<< 30  31  32    34  35  36 >>

log in

join