It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Indigo5
originally posted by: butcherguy
originally posted by: Indigo5
originally posted by: butcherguy
a reply to: Indigo5
He received IMMUNITY from the FBI regarding what he did and did not do with her email and email server..and was interviewed multiple times by them.
His immunity was limited and it was granted before he tampered with the emails. That is the meaning of his 'Oh #' moment.
He very well may have violated that agreement with the tampering.
From everything I could google he was granted immunity early this year...the Reddit exchange was a couple years ago.
They were still in the process of subpoenaing emails when he was on Reddit..The FBI investigation wasn't even rolling with interviews then.
I am 99% percent sure you are 100% wrong.
I am not 100% wrong about him being granted limited immunity.
If he did naughty things that were not disclosed when he made the immunity deal... he is not immune from prosecution for those things.
What makes you think the immunity was "limited" and not "blanket"?
It would be nice if you outright admitted you made the last post up about him being granted immunity before he made the reddit post? I might take you more seriously and find you more credible and be interested in trading posts if you acknowledged you were wrong with your claim?
It's possible he disclosed this already to the FBI under immunity..
"Did you alter the emails in any way possible"...No
"Did you attempt to alter the emails in any way possible"...yes..I was trying to swap her email address with a place-holder to protect the address but was unsuccessfully..
It goes on and on...but there is no route where this has legal teeth..
originally posted by: butcherguy
What makes you think the immunity was "limited" and not "blanket"?
I acknowledge that I was wrong about when Combetta was granted immunity. I was confusing players in this tangled web that Hillary has woven.
My apologies for being human.
originally posted by: JacKatMtn
a reply to: Indigo5
I could have sworn that I have seen that email without redaction, but having seen so much stuff the past few days, I could be mistaken... just to clear the record
originally posted by: MotherMayEye
a reply to: Indigo5
You know the fact that this Reddit post singles out the VIP's email address is actually very incriminating to Hilary, herself.
Whether the post was about keeping her email address (which was already public) private, or stripping it out entirely and replacing it with a scapegoat email address, the request would surely have originated WITH Hillary.
Why would others want to tamper with her email address or make it private without her knowledge or consent and in violation of the law?
If the Clintons were paying for Mr. Combetta’s time and travel, and especially if they were paying for any legal assistance he received through his employer, Denver-based Platte River Networks, it raises the question of how independent Mr. Combetta’s cooperation with the FBI was. Alternately, it could show he remained tethered, and therefore loyal to some degree, to Hillary Clinton and her team
originally posted by: Indigo5
a reply to: Grambler
Gotta get to work..so I will be brief..
"they" is a good question..
I think logic and circumstance strongly points to the FBI already having asked that question under a blanket of immunity and gotten an answer and followed that lead to a conclusion.
If not...then there is more to be revealed.
The Congressional Committee is not the FBI...them asking him to testify is separate...they should be asking the FBI for his interview notes...why aren't they?. The fact that the Committee asked the FBI to investigate Clinton for perjury and the FBI said no, there was not a case to be made there...highlights the difference in investigative standards between a politically motivated committee and the FBI.
originally posted by: Indigo5
It's interesting...but not proof...there is a distance to be covered there and might have already been covered in the FBI investigation.
Unanswered questions...likely her email address but possibly another VIP on the emails...Bills?...Colin Powells?..
It could have been staff taking initiative...
originally posted by: jadedANDcynical
a reply to: burntheships
Yes indeed, I found the same thing. Lookie here at the invoice:
Why in the hell would they charge $19283.10 for "PR for Clinton email inquiries," and $25733.50 for "Legal activity re: Hillary Clinton..."
related:
Despite Boian’s statement that Platte River set up a 30-day revolving retention policy for Clinton’s emails, Johnson’s letter noted that Platte River employees were directed to reduce the amount of email data being stored with each backup. Late this summer, Johnson wrote, a Platte River employee took note of this change and inquired whether the company could search its archives for an email from Clinton Executive Service Corp. directing such a reduction in October or November 2014 and then again around February, advising Platte River to save only emails sent during the most recent 30 days.
Those reductions would have occurred after the State Department requested that Clinton turn over her emails.
...
“If we have it in writing that they told us to cut the backups,” the employee wrote, “and that we can go public with our statement saying we have had backups since day one, then we were told to trim to 30 days, it would make us look a WHOLE LOT better,” according to the email cited by Johnson.
The above bolded and underlined statement is another way of saying that they were instructed to delete data (emails) from the back up.
McClatchy
originally posted by: MotherMayEye
I am tired of hearing that Combetta was granted immunity because the FBI investigation was about getting to the "big fish."
No big fish was indicted and, in fact, Combetta's immunity simply allowed him to take the fall for criminal wrongdoing so the "big fish" could skate free.
The FBI appears so very dirty now.
originally posted by: Grambler
Now the question becomes, if the House did request those documents, why is the FBI doing there best to not let Congress see them?
Doesn't this seem fishy to you?
To be clear, the evidence that Combetta is “stonetear” is circumstantial, and it’s not clear if there is anything illegal about the Reddit request. But the optics sure don’t look good, and strongly suggest that Combetta turned to social media for advice about how to tamper with government records that should been preserved.
If you want to do shady stuff on the Internet, cover your tracks. Otherwise, you’ll end up like Paul Combetta, whose careless mistake just added new fuel to the never-ending controversy over Hillary Clinton’s missing emails.