It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Grambler
originally posted by: UnBreakable
Exactly. They should take him to a seven story parking garage and throw him off to his death.........or burn him alive.............or publicly stone him.........or behead him......or put him in a cage and lower him in a pool till he drowns, etc. Instead he'll experience the humane US Justice system instead of the Iron Age justice of his culture.
I actually disagree. I like what Donald said today. Make the trial happen fast, let it be fair, and if he is found guilty, give him the harshest punishment allowed.
We need to strive to be better than the psychos that threaten our way of life. I have no problem calling out Islamic terrorism, but I do not want to sink to their barbarism.
originally posted by: NHILAR
a reply to: Gryphon66
My personal beliefs are that religion should be an individual persuit instead of an institutionalized form of control. Believe what you want, start killing people over it or allow it to happen, then you need to go away.
Sorry to tell you increasing the number of people who are wrong does not add legitimacy to the wrong ideal. 1.8 billion x zero = zero.
If you do not know what happneed in 1979, then the American education system is shining through...Let's try this and see if you get it...the oldest continually operating empire the world has ever seen lost its last and central provence to extremist islam...
originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: UnBreakable
Wow, it's just like every Black American lives in an inner city ghetto, every Muslim country in the world lives under the strictest Sharia law?
Most countries don't accept Sharia or accept it partially in some areas of life.
PS Its based in the same traditions as Judeo Christian law ... So might not want to throw that stone too far.
originally posted by: kosmicjack
I don't understand how this guy could go to Afghanistan and Pakistan, for extended periods, Kabul no less -and marry someone over there - and not get flagged? Especially after the guy in San Bernardino did the exact same thing.
I mean, after that, they should have gone through a database of travelers, looking for similar patterns and demanding answers/contacts, locations, money trail, etc. Hello...metadata.
originally posted by: kosmicjack
I don't understand how this guy could go to Afghanistan and Pakistan, for extended periods, Kabul no less -and marry someone over there - and not get flagged? Especially after the guy in San Bernardino did the exact same thing.
I mean, after that, they should have gone through a database of travelers, looking for similar patterns and demanding answers/contacts, locations, money trail, etc. Hello...metadata.
originally posted by: NHILAR
a reply to: Gryphon66
Its okay Gryphon66, the world is big and scary, and you must, like your arogance requires, project your value system on all of humanity - you can not understand - perhaps because it would break your perfect snowflake mind - that there are cultures entirely alien to your way of thinking.
Do you even realize that there is no concept of lying to an 'ajnabe' (hint you are one) in the Muslim word? Can you even grasp what this means?
originally posted by: burgerbuddy
Trump would make it so that people like that would be "interviewed" before and after they came back.
originally posted by: Gryphon66
originally posted by: burgerbuddy
Trump would make it so that people like that would be "interviewed" before and after they came back.
How would Trump "make it like that" exactly?
Executive Order setting our laws in abeyance?
Wait a minute, I've heard something about this before ... give me a minute ...
Oh yeah, it's supposedly "tyranny."
originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: burgerbuddy
It's not me that wishes that "all ideologies were equal" it's the US Constitution that states clearly the limitations of government power in regard to religion.
Sorry you don't like the Constitution's take on things, BB.
originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: burgerbuddy
Funny how tyrannical actions are okay when it's "your guy" in charge, eh?
Extreme vetting for all eh? How extreme? A little waterboarding maybe?
Or "a hell of a lot worse?"
Sure. Who needs that Constitutional thing anyway, eh?
originally posted by: poncho1982
You may not want to hear this, but islam is proving itself to be a violent religion. I'd even go so far as to say it's already been proven via history.
originally posted by: UKTruth
originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: burgerbuddy
Funny how tyrannical actions are okay when it's "your guy" in charge, eh?
Extreme vetting for all eh? How extreme? A little waterboarding maybe?
Or "a hell of a lot worse?"
Sure. Who needs that Constitutional thing anyway, eh?
You are conflating two issues.
Waterboarding and 'a hell of a lot worse' was about interrogation of terrorists, not immigration vetting.