posted on Sep, 18 2016 @ 07:31 PM
a reply to: Phage
I think voting to not having someone take office is just as worthwhile as someone's vote to have someone take office and are equivalent in worth. I
don't think anyone's rights are being infringed at all. In fact I think not allowing it is what's actually infringing peoples rights, as it's making
it so people are not allowed to vote against nothing but bad options.
A lot of people don't even vote at all because they don't like any candidates, and they are scorned because they won't pick a side.
How about a none of the above vote. If it wins, then a campaign reset is required. Does this idea have any merit to you?
Is there any option that allows us to tell them that none of the candidates presented are acceptable that counts that will work for you.
As is, if almost everyone writes in, none of the above, and 99.999999% of the populace did so. If even 1 person voted for someone, they would be
This is an absurd way to elect our leaders.
edit on 9/18/2016 by Puppylove because: (no reason given)