It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Help ATS via PayPal:
learn more

Why is the alt right attempting to rewrite history?

page: 7
41
<< 4  5  6   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Sep, 19 2016 @ 07:38 AM
link   

originally posted by: Kali74

originally posted by: jimmyx

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: Deny Arrogance

If they can't call you "deplorable", then alt-right will have to do.


why do all republicans assume that they are the 50% that are deplorable, rather that the 50% who are sane and thoughtful?...


Some people have to constantly paint themselves as victims so they can either try to shield themselves from being called out for their crap or so that they can hurl backwards insults.



Actually... It's when you address "republicans" or any kind of attachment that notes the whole group. You don't designate who you're referring to, you just say "Christians" or "republicans" or "Most of..." or some other idiotic label that makes the reader feel that they're part of it. If you said "some republicans", it's quite a bit of a difference. I guarantee you... I will put money on it, whatever you want to bet... Whatever one side is guilty of, you can bet your behind the other side has just as much fault as your target. I beg you to prove it otherwise.




posted on Sep, 19 2016 @ 07:43 AM
link   

originally posted by: StallionDuck

originally posted by: Kali74

originally posted by: jimmyx

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: Deny Arrogance

If they can't call you "deplorable", then alt-right will have to do.


why do all republicans assume that they are the 50% that are deplorable, rather that the 50% who are sane and thoughtful?...


Some people have to constantly paint themselves as victims so they can either try to shield themselves from being called out for their crap or so that they can hurl backwards insults.



Actually... It's when you address "republicans" or any kind of attachment that notes the whole group. You don't designate who you're referring to, you just say "Christians" or "republicans" or "Most of..." or some other idiotic label that makes the reader feel that they're part of it. If you said "some republicans", it's quite a bit of a difference. I guarantee you... I will put money on it, whatever you want to bet... Whatever one side is guilty of, you can bet your behind the other side has just as much fault as your target. I beg you to prove it otherwise.


Oh please.

When I see you complaining about the garbage directed at "the left" and "libtards" you might have a point.

Selective outrage on display here folks.



posted on Sep, 19 2016 @ 07:56 AM
link   
a reply to: IgnoranceIsntBlisss

Unless I am mistaken, they called themselves the "Alt-Right" before Clinton brought to the national stage.
edit on 19-9-2016 by Pyle because: GRAMMER



posted on Sep, 19 2016 @ 08:11 AM
link   

originally posted by: Pyle
a reply to: IgnoranceIsntBlisss

Unless I am mistaken, they called themselves the "Alt-Right" before Clinton brought to the national stage.


Richard Spencer 2008



posted on Sep, 19 2016 @ 10:41 AM
link   
a reply to: WilburnRoach

Both political sides lie.

Republican politicians lie, democratic politicians lie.

It has more to do with the nature of government itself.



posted on Sep, 19 2016 @ 11:11 AM
link   
a reply to: Gryphon66


Dare I say... If the shoe fits?

Maybe if a vast amount of it wouldn't COME FROM the liberal side...



posted on Sep, 19 2016 @ 03:03 PM
link   
Well They've been raising crazy ass "theories" about Hillary Clinton for twenty five years. Do you think white trash with money Trump could handle that heat?



posted on Sep, 19 2016 @ 04:04 PM
link   
You have to question the judgement and sanity of anyone who would even consider a sleazy casino owner to do the most important job in the world.



posted on Sep, 19 2016 @ 09:09 PM
link   

originally posted by: Kali74
a reply to: WilburnRoach

I think there is a significant portion of the far Right that perceives reality much differently than it actually is.


And about 100% of the far Left perceives reality totally different than it actually is.

But that is ok for you I guess.



posted on Sep, 19 2016 @ 09:12 PM
link   

originally posted by: Benevolent Heretic

originally posted by: [post=21262637]collietta[/post
The real question is why are you using the brand new buzz word: alt right? By virtue of being on this site, regardless how left you are, you fall into that category.


Wait a minute... WHAT? Being on this site means we're part of the "alt-right"? I beg to differ. ATS is not an alt-right site.

By the way, "alt-right" is not a brand new buzz word... Just because it's new to you, doesn't mean it's new. It's been around for years as a synonym of white supremacist nationalism.


More BS from the peanut gallery, just like ISIS, existed before 2014.

NOONE ever heard of either of them before, and that makes it new, and you do not get to decide what is or is not a correct synonym, WOW.



posted on Sep, 20 2016 @ 02:32 PM
link   
a reply to: Phage

Because he was one of the last of the party to "unite" under Obama. He also filed a lawsuit about the birther issue. So the assumption could have been made but...maybe...

www.washingtontimes.com...



Mr. Berg said he was contacted about filing the lawsuit by a member or associate of the group PUMA, which was formed to support Mrs. Clinton shortly after she withdrew from the race. Its mission includes denouncing the Democratic Party and Mr. Obama’s nomination.
“I really do not believe he is a natural-born citizen,” said Mr. Berg, adding that he is not connected with Mrs. Clinton or her campaign.



he is just a crazy Uber driver...

www.phillymag.com...




top topics



 
41
<< 4  5  6   >>

log in

join