It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Help ATS via PayPal:
learn more

Huma Abedin to be Clinton's Secretary of State, Say Wiki-leaked Emails

page: 2
34
<< 1    3 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Sep, 18 2016 @ 04:31 PM
link   

originally posted by: Stormdancer777

originally posted by: MongolianPaellaFish
Evidence please. Surely even Clinton wouldn't be that stupid. Huma is massively unqualified for the role.


Well, Huma is prolly the other half of Hillary's brain.


Are you saying that Blumenthal is the first half?




posted on Sep, 18 2016 @ 04:43 PM
link   

originally posted by: queenofswords

originally posted by: MongolianPaellaFish
Evidence please. Surely even Clinton wouldn't be that stupid. Huma is massively unqualified for the role.


Hillary travelled to 112 countries and logged over 950,000 miles during her tenner as SOS.


And still found time to delete 30,000+ emails.



posted on Sep, 18 2016 @ 05:26 PM
link   
Good story, Trump should announce his first act as POTUS will be to investigate that woman's ties to the Muslim Brotherhood, her access to classified materials, and all of her communications she has had. Make the FBI work for the people again.



posted on Sep, 18 2016 @ 06:03 PM
link   

originally posted by: MongolianPaellaFish

originally posted by: jadedANDcynical
a reply to: Sillyolme

Yeah, I called Obama for the Supreme Court months ago.


Obama is not a judge, how could he be appointed to the Supreme Court?



You don't even have to be a lawyer.


There are no official qualifications for becoming a Supreme Court justice.

The Constitution spells out age, citizenship and residency requirements for becoming president of the United States or a member of Congress but mentions no rules for joining the nation’s highest court. [/exwww.history.com...



posted on Sep, 18 2016 @ 08:38 PM
link   

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: queenofswords

Meet Chief Justice Barak Hussein Obama.
🌹🍁🍂🌹🌹🍁🍂🌹🌹


No freaking way.

(runs towards bathroom to hurl.....alot)


edit on 18-9-2016 by dianajune because: typo



posted on Sep, 18 2016 @ 08:42 PM
link   
What a joke - Huma can't even manage her husband...



posted on Sep, 18 2016 @ 08:44 PM
link   
a reply to: dianajune

I wonder what Scalia would have to say.



posted on Sep, 18 2016 @ 08:49 PM
link   
a reply to: tweetie
He probably would have died of a brain aneurysm anyway at the merest thought of such.



posted on Sep, 18 2016 @ 08:52 PM
link   

originally posted by: MongolianPaellaFish


Obama is not a judge, how could he be appointed to the Supreme Court?


He's at least a constitutional law professor [cough]. And Elena Kagan
was never a judge either: she was an arguer at the Big Bench.
Besides, if Bush 43 can nominate Harriet Mears anything goes...
thank God THAT one didn't go over either.

At this point we should just leverage Barry over to Sec General
of the UN to minimize the damage to our country. Let the master
vampire be the President of the planet and just be done with it.

I'd like to see Huma get in as SoS... that would be more of a wreck
than reanimating Bonano and having him run the Pentagon... or
at least like I said before Meyer Lansky at the Treasury. WOOT.

All this on the provision I almost stumped for Rahm in Chicago...
because I wanted every one of them to know how messed up
it would be to have him for the Mayor. They put him in ANYWAY.



posted on Sep, 18 2016 @ 09:22 PM
link   

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: queenofswords

Tenner?


*tenure

(feel better, Silly? It was a simple typo...sheesh!)



posted on Sep, 18 2016 @ 11:02 PM
link   

originally posted by: MongolianPaellaFish
Evidence please. Surely even Clinton wouldn't be that stupid. Huma is massively unqualified for the role.


Well, someone leaked it to a Wikileaks.

How could it NOT be true???? Particularly with such a sensational headline!!!!!!!!!!



posted on Sep, 18 2016 @ 11:43 PM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen

Where's the leaked document? Not that I have any reason to question the Santa Monica Observer but it does seems strange that it's not even linked. Seems strange also that Breitbart isn't "reporting" on this either (their pushing some other scaremongering with Syrian refugees). It's not even on Drudge.

There's not even an excerpt from the document?



posted on Sep, 18 2016 @ 11:46 PM
link   

originally posted by: queenofswords
a reply to: threeeyesopen


She and her family are up to their eyeballs in the Muslim Brotherhood. There is lots of verifiable info on this woman. IMO, she is definitely not someone you would want as SOS.

In the Dem's eyes that one statement seals the deal



posted on Sep, 18 2016 @ 11:52 PM
link   
a reply to: theantediluvian

We always are supposed to question media.

The fact that you don't, explains very well why you are a democrat.



posted on Sep, 18 2016 @ 11:53 PM
link   
She wouldn't be the first foreign born? was she not born in Kalamazoo, Michigan?



posted on Sep, 18 2016 @ 11:59 PM
link   
a reply to: xstealth

Here I thought you only questioned me. It sure seems like somebody just pasted a random link to a source nobody has ever heard of and 30+ flags and 2 pages of posts later, I'm the first person to point out that there's no link to the document at Wikileaks, there's no image of the document and there's not even an excerpt from it.

In other words there is absolutely nothing and yet here you are defending it.

Tell me about your level of skepticism again?
edit on 2016-9-18 by theantediluvian because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 19 2016 @ 12:00 AM
link   

originally posted by: theantediluvian
a reply to: xuenchen

Where's the leaked document? Not that I have any reason to question the Santa Monica Observer but it does seems strange that it's not even linked. Seems strange also that Breitbart isn't "reporting" on this either (their pushing some other scaremongering with Syrian refugees). It's not even on Drudge.

There's not even an excerpt from the document?


That would be the first red flag to question the article and the Santa Monica Observer as a whole, the second would be the numerous spelling and grammatical errors in a supposedly professional article, the third, and final flag to be hoisted would be the fact several paragraphs are directly copy and pasted from the Wikipedia page on Abedin as I mentioned on page 1.



posted on Sep, 19 2016 @ 12:07 AM
link   

originally posted by: theantediluvian
a reply to: xstealth

I'm the first person to point out that there's no link to the document at Wikileaks, there's no image of the document and there's not even an excerpt from it.

To be fair, the OP was the first to mention that, although it shouldn't need to be mentioned as it stares one in the face.



posted on Sep, 19 2016 @ 12:24 AM
link   
a reply to: theantediluvian

I thought the same thing after coming across this article on Friday night. Couldn't find a link, or any other news source, so I posted the story at bottom of some existing thread. Since Hillary isn't going to be President, I almost didn't post it at all.



posted on Sep, 19 2016 @ 12:25 AM
link   
a reply to: coffeetalk

I stand corrected. It was mentioned in the OP that there was no link to Wikileaks.




top topics



 
34
<< 1    3 >>

log in

join