It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Help ATS via PayPal:
learn more

Time to put up and shut up. Prove you're not a shill.

page: 4
21
<< 1  2  3    5  6  7 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Sep, 18 2016 @ 01:51 PM
link   

originally posted by: introvert

a reply to: Sillyolme


Now I'm going to look up Ashley Madison.


Don't. It will be a waste of your time.


Too late. Like damning Marty Feldmans eyes.




posted on Sep, 18 2016 @ 01:52 PM
link   

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: Lysergic
I can count at least 4.


I can count higher than that.

Oh wait, you were talking about shills. Sorry.


I literally laughed out loud at this. Nice work.



posted on Sep, 18 2016 @ 01:53 PM
link   
a reply to: Greggers

I did get a pair of candy apple red jet skis for hubby and me so there's that. No cash though but I'm ok with what I got.



posted on Sep, 18 2016 @ 01:56 PM
link   
a reply to: AugustusMasonicus

Which is exactly what I thought your objection was.
Roots maybe but not the same .



posted on Sep, 18 2016 @ 01:58 PM
link   
a reply to: NoCorruptionAllowed

Not what this thread is about.
Not that it matters. Unless you're in the camp of the OP.

She totally ignored my posts but she did, for the second time today talk about me to another member.
edit on 9182016 by Sillyolme because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 18 2016 @ 02:00 PM
link   
Do I get flair or a new button on my avatar? LOL.

I'll say the same things about Clinton (the person I'm voting for) and Trump (the person I'm voting against) that I've said elsewhere.

She is quite often her own worst enemy. Her reactions to being a target of the right-wing machine for three decades have inevitably made her seem cold and secretive. Other than that, she seems to have some of the worst luck I've ever seen. I have no doubt, personally, that Mrs. Clinton has either done or approved some truly criminal activities in her time, but, at the same time, I believe those things have never come to light (and probably won't). The absurdities that are laid at her feet have all been either disproved or shown to have had virtually no negative impact.

Trump has great skill in self-promotion. Over the course of his career, he built the brand TRUMP above and beyond anything his father even imagined. He seemed for most of his career to be a very balanced thinker, not coming off as an extremist either for "the right or the left." Over the last decade, he has become less and less believable.

#readyformycloseupmrdemille



posted on Sep, 18 2016 @ 02:00 PM
link   

originally posted by: Sillyolme
Which is exactly what I thought your objection was.
Roots maybe but not the same .


Take it up with the Democrat Party, they claim both Jefferson and Madison.



posted on Sep, 18 2016 @ 02:05 PM
link   
a reply to: Gryphon66

I said that earlier today about being secretive. But thirty years of tax documentation, every penny received or spent by the Clinton foundation documented on line. The transcripts of hearings and trials online I think there is also a pretty good case to be made for transparency too.



posted on Sep, 18 2016 @ 02:08 PM
link   
a reply to: AugustusMasonicus

Nothing personal dude. But you were wrong about my historic knowledge weren't you? I knew what party Jefferson was. Obviously with my comment to DBCowboy
edit on 9182016 by Sillyolme because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 18 2016 @ 02:08 PM
link   
a reply to: Puppylove
I'll bite hiya puppy! As I cannot even look at Hillary without gagging a bit Trump isn't much better. While I cannot see how anyone could vote for Hillary I always try to keep an open mind while reading the Trump threads too, it's hard. lol in the end I liked the Jefferson post on the first page. Yup George Jefferson for president
Hope you are having a good day puppy!



posted on Sep, 18 2016 @ 02:10 PM
link   


Does this count?



posted on Sep, 18 2016 @ 02:11 PM
link   

originally posted by: Sillyolme
Nothing personal dude. But you were wrong about my historic knowledge weren't you? I knew what party Jefferson was.


If you knew Jefferson and Madison were Democrats then why ask me if I would not vote for a Democrat?

What you meant to ask me is if I would vote for a big government cretin like Johnson. The answer to that would be no.



posted on Sep, 18 2016 @ 02:17 PM
link   
a reply to: Puppylove

Very well, puppylove.. after I bump the thread for its basic
nobility. I BTW am not trying to butter a muffin and even
act like I'm drawing away from the gravity of this election.
I know some shills are cautious to do that in order to 'slip
one by' of questionable merit for talking points.
I won't mince words, promise. And I haven't been educated
in political history to the extent I'm credible anyway.

Being a Trumpeter, here goes with the downsides-- he's still
holding on to his condensed tax return, because he and
the Apprentice crew fully know nobody is going to take
apart a long form almost half the size of the Patriot Act.

His health is publicly stated to approximately the same
extent as HIllary's, and is purportedly very good.. yet
nobody in the psychiatric community has analyzed
Jason Cord's cranial mechanics. Telling.... 'We're not
going there, he's litigious and well-heeled enough to
make all our lives Hell' ...

Finally, there are several attributes of the man's personality
that Hillary is spot on about. He's bombastic, and capable of
diplomatic nuance on the order of the china shop bull...
coupled with the natural ego possessed inside possibly the
thinnest skin since Chris Hitchens God bless him:
I see no greater danger than seeing him getting the Football
centered to him. If that scenario plays out we're all toast.
Well done.


Hillary's positives are somewhat more numerous but intriguing:

As a career politician, she has yet to be even indicted for al-
legedly doing things that would make Alistair Crowley blush...
or at lest move quickly to the other side of the cocktail hour.
This degree of experience in successfully getting things done
under the table or out at the forest preserve is good reason
why NOBODY including Putin would dare cross her.

Her list of unproven areas of growth, in variety and scope, con-
tinues to grow apparently unchecked; and with the evident
blessings of the people REALLY running the planet. This means
that she has powerful friends in high places, that will assist in
administrating her (er, their ) administration's policies.

I fully expect after this election cycle that the Don, if he won:
would conversely age rapidly from pushing the round rock up
the mountain in a four year Sisyphus setup.

MY two cents are the agonizing over the lesser of two evils
this time around-- but I'll reserve my well known choices for
a less partisan thread. And a shill, puppylove, would not call
the choice of the two major presidential candidates more
stinkin' than my four day old Tommy Hilfigers bustin' concrete.
Outside, and in high summer.
edit on 18-9-2016 by derfreebie because: Sentence construction of a total deplorable

edit on 18-9-2016 by derfreebie because: [n] is for Numbskull



posted on Sep, 18 2016 @ 02:23 PM
link   
Im not voting (as of right now) WHY?
Trump: Clearly a misogynist, narcissistic, filed bankruptcy 4 or 5 times now, could be a rapist and pedophile with a current federal lawsuit filed against him that has not disappeared. He makes fun of the weak, disabled and other than white ethnicity's ...He appears to talk out his ass, he LIES, doesn't give any real plans on HOW HE WILL DO SOMETHING. He has no real clue how foreign economic policies are working as he spoke about China in the TPP which they are not even a part of. He is a war monger, double talks if you listen close, and HIS HAIR!!! OMG!!!

Clinton: She is sick, how so I don't know but she is. She comes across as being so high and mighty and that her bowel movements do not stink. She is bought and paid for and clearly has way too many under the cover deals going on. She is old. Not that age matters, but like I said, she is sick.....She lies and has been caught lying.


edit on 18-9-2016 by Mobius8 because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 18 2016 @ 02:27 PM
link   

originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus

originally posted by: Sillyolme
Which is exactly what I thought your objection was.
Roots maybe but not the same .


Take it up with the Democrat Party, they claim both Jefferson and Madison.
and there's hope in that...maybe we can get you to support a live democrat then.



posted on Sep, 18 2016 @ 02:29 PM
link   

originally posted by: Sillyolme
and there's hope in that...maybe we can get you to support a live democrat then.


Doubtful. The current Democratic party is a hideous mess.



posted on Sep, 18 2016 @ 02:31 PM
link   
a reply to: AugustusMasonicus

I think both parties are fecked in 4 years. You should all March on Washington and hang the bastards.



posted on Sep, 18 2016 @ 02:33 PM
link   

originally posted by: TheKnightofDoom
I think both parties are fecked in 4 years. You should all March on Washington and hang the bastards.


Hanging is too quick. I want to get a bit more Marsellus Wallace medieval on them.




edit on 18-9-2016 by AugustusMasonicus because: Ph'nglui mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn



posted on Sep, 18 2016 @ 02:35 PM
link   
a reply to: Sillyolme

Your two posts were exceedingly tame. Compare your posts to my attempt, and do note that while I mentioned disappointment in the effort you put in I did so while mentioning that you, who has seemed incapable ever even hinting that Hillary could ever do anything wrong, at least attempted to participate.

You're not the only one disappointing me here, there are plenty of people on all sides doing so. A couple sentences that are more minor annoyances than anything really bad is not exactly stepping up to the plate. It's a token bunt at best.

At least you got credit for participating. That's more than I expected and more than many get. Half that don't read the rules. At least other than the *but that doesn't mean I think* caveat you at least stayed within the rules as well.

Heck I even starred one of your posts for making the attempt. I think possibly the second post of yours I've ever starred.

So don't assume my issue is because, no matter what you did it would mean nothing. It clearly did, you A: got credit for at least trying, and B: credit for mostly staying in the rules.

That does not mean I will give you a standing ovation for contributing a few short sentences and none of them about anything major you conflict with Hillary over. I've never agreed with anyone so much that what you posted could be my biggest disagreement. Heck I don't even agree with myself that much.

You can do better. Heck I did better and I think my attempt sucked. If I think my attempt sucked, which I've already said, why would I consider what you posted some great success?



posted on Sep, 18 2016 @ 02:48 PM
link   
a reply to: AugustusMasonicus

Because of the democratic republican party. But I also wasn't sure what part of history you thought I cut class on so I had to get clarification.




top topics



 
21
<< 1  2  3    5  6  7 >>

log in

join