It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: WeRpeons
a reply to: AlienView
Trump hands down...with just taking into consideration three quotes that came from the horses mouth.
(1) 'If We Have [Nuclear Weapons], Why Can't We Use Them?"
(2) “I’m good at war,” he said. “I’ve had a lot of wars of my own. I’m really good at war. I love war in a certain way, but
only when we win.”
(3) “I would bring back waterboarding and I'd bring back a hell of a lot worse than waterboarding."
originally posted by: Throes
originally posted by: DJW001
originally posted by: Throes
Considering that Hilary was a part of a regime which helped form ISIS, I'd say she's worse.
Please stop with that lie; Trump doesn't even tell it any more.
You have some research to do!! Start here..
truthinmedia.com...
Considering what North Korea has been up to? They should be reminded that we could retaliate if boy likes to play with his. And winning, always good winning. Not leaving a big fat mess. And worse than waterboarding? It wouldn't be as bad as being burnt alive in a cage would it?
.........However having said that, if I had to pick the most dangerous of the two who would be more tempted to use nuclear weapons, it would be Trump hands down! He's the type of person who would react and worry about the consequence later. He's proven it throughout his campaign! If you're in denial of his stupid and dangerous rhetoric, you're in company with the rest of Trump's supporters.
Who is more dangerous a mixture of Barry Goldwater and Charles Lindbergh in Trump or Richard Nixon personified in Clinton? I am not convinced either candidate would stop the drift towards global conflict on a scale not seen since WW2.
Clearly Trump would pose the risk if he didn't smarten up his act in the event he became President.