Clinton instructed staff to remove classified headers in e-mails

Good "reminder" article about the time Hillary desperately demanded that headers from an email containing classified material be stripped and sent over a fax.

More proof of the skullduggery happening while she was Secretary of State.

The email highlighted is from 2011.

Clinton instructed staff to remove classified headers in e-mails

One of the e-mails leaked by Guccifer 2.0 this past week didn’t seem to get any attention. I thought it was rather interest that Hillary Clinton in 2011 basically instructed her State Department staff to remove any classified headers in e-mails so she could go with the lie that she never sent or received classified information. This e-mail from “Hrod17” clearly shows Hillary Clinton telling staff to remove headers and send the e-mails unsecure.

Actual email from State Department website

a reply to: xuenchen
I just sit on the edge of my seat everyday waiting to here the latest about Hillary's emails.
Thanks for the breath of Fug air.

We simply can't afford to have someone elected president who systematically lies to congress and all the people of the USA. If she can't be trusted with our congress, how can even Hillary supporters trust her? She will throw everyone under the closest bus at any opportunity. Anyone who would vote for her is a sadomasochist. She is the pinnacle of every type of disgusting thing that decent people reject in their walk of life.

originally posted by: xuenchen
Good "reminder" article about the time Hillary desperately demanded that headers from an email containing classified material be stripped and sent over a fax.

More proof of the skullduggery happening while she was Secretary of State.

The email highlighted is from 2011.

Clinton instructed staff to remove classified headers in e-mails

One of the e-mails leaked by Guccifer 2.0 this past week didn’t seem to get any attention. I thought it was rather interest that Hillary Clinton in 2011 basically instructed her State Department staff to remove any classified headers in e-mails so she could go with the lie that she never sent or received classified information. This e-mail from “Hrod17” clearly shows Hillary Clinton telling staff to remove headers and send the e-mails unsecure.

Actual email from State department website

This is not a new thing.
This specifically was talked about in the Comey hearing.

Hillary did not just tell the staffers to remove the markings - she also told them to turn it in turning into nonpaper. It means making into something less formal, in effect removing the classified part.

a reply to: DupontDeux

Yes.

Remove the classified markings.

That email, alone, should've sent her to prison.

Yup, and I've seen good soldiers and officers lose careers and do time for much much less.

That E-mail should have been sent classified. What is wrong with her.

She is a liar and a saboteur..

a reply to: NoCorruptionAllowed

Polls indicate that at long last America is realizing that Hillary's smile means absolutely nothing. Her dark side is in control of most of her actions.

How do we know that Hillary isn't working with Russia?

So do we have to keep debunking things every time someone posts the same things over and over?

Comey on Non-paper

Watch as the GOP tries to get the FBI Director to say something to help their witch hunt.

originally posted by: TheBulk
How do we know that Hillary isn't working with Russia?

Russia would want to be the "controller" in that working relationship. Wouldn't happen. Hillary answers to no-one.

The average American takes more security measures to protect their bagged lunch at work than Hillary did and does with classified information, for a little perspective.

originally posted by: carewemust

originally posted by: TheBulk
How do we know that Hillary isn't working with Russia?

Russia would want to be the "controller" in that working relationship. Wouldn't happen. Hillary answers to no-one.

She's exposing Confidential and secret information. And she's instructing her employees to help her. It definitely looks a lot worse than anything the media has used to accuse Trump of working with Russia.

a reply to: TheBulk

Here you got Watch this for the truth about the matter you are speaking about.



FBI on Non-Paper (Comey a hearing over FBI Clinton investigation)

originally posted by: Pyle
a reply to: TheBulk

Here you got Watch this for the truth about the matter you are speaking about.



FBI on Non-Paper (Comey a hearing over FBI Clinton investigation)

Which part are you referring to?

Here is just a few words Comey said: WE FOUND THE CLASSIFIED FAX WAS SENT.

So, if you are reading something different, please explain.

The part where he said a staff member did not follow instructions, Is that the part you are referring?

Because this thread is about what Non-paper means which Director Comey addressed.

originally posted by: carewemust

originally posted by: TheBulk
How do we know that Hillary isn't working with Russia?

Russia would want to be the "controller" in that working relationship. Wouldn't happen. Hillary answers to no-one.

Unless she stands to profit?

"Militia meltdown: Is Oregon standoff really about government insiders selling U.S. uranium to Russia?"
Sour ce

"Unknown" status but,

During that time, a flow of cash made its way to the Clinton Foundation. After Russia announced its plan to take over Uranium One, former President Bill Clinton received $500,000 for a Moscow speech from a Russian investment bank with ties to the Kremlin.(3)

In other words, there is good reason to believe that the Clinton Foundation helped sell Uranium One to the Russians by ensuring them US plutonium. Therefore, it’s possible the recent Oregon standoff wasn’t fueled by the activities of Dwight and Steven Hammond, but by government insiders trying to sell US uranium to Russia.(2) According to this theory, the reason why US authorities have been so hard on the protesters is because they are occupying a valuable piece of land – a piece that was promised to Russia for its plutonium resources.

The New York Times states, “Whether the donations [to the Clinton Foundation] played any role in the approval of the uranium deal is unknown. But the episode underscores the special ethical challenges presented by the Clinton Foundation, headed by a former president who relied heavily on foreign cash to accumulate $250 million in assets even as his wife helped steer American foreign policy as secretary of state, presiding over decisions with the potential to benefit the foundation’s donors.”(3)

a reply to: xuenchen

June 8, 2020

The S...L....O....W wheels of Justice have rendered a verdict.

Hillary Clinton must testify in Court on Sept 9, 2020 regarding her e-mails and how she circumvented National Security rules.

Almost impossible to find this judge's ruling in Mainstream Media, because Joe Biden needs Hillary to help him TRY to keep President Trump from being re-elected this year. And Mainstream Media is ALL-IN for Biden.

But, here's a website with a summary: www.joshwho.net...