It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Puppylove
a reply to: angeldoll
Speaking of hunters and gatherers, ok there's another way we can be free, by being allowed to grow food, collect water, hunt and feed ourselves. Too bad that's being regulated into an impossibility. Thus slaves.
originally posted by: Puppylove
a reply to: angeldoll
So slavery isn't slavery then? A slave is bought, given shelter and fed, in exchange for doing the work demanded of him. So even though the man has no choice. It's just work, right? It's all a matter of perspective? The slave should be happy with his work?
originally posted by: Puppylove
a reply to: jacobe001
Well depending on the slave owner, but mostly true.
originally posted by: ChesterJohn
a reply to: Aazadan
Well with that why charge money for any product.
originally posted by: Puppylove
a reply to: angeldoll
Speaking of hunters and gatherers, ok there's another way we can be free, by being allowed to grow food, collect water, hunt and feed ourselves. Too bad that's being regulated into an impossibility. Thus slaves.
The only way we will ever be free is when food and water become a given right. Once food, water and basic shelter are met, then earnings for work can start. One should not be forced to work or die. That's slavery. We should be trying to move beyond that.
originally posted by: intrptr
A measure of ones worth is not determined by how much money and stuff they have.
Rather, how we behave towards others.
originally posted by: Blaine91555
The former Soviet Union should have taught the world what happens when a person is provided for without the actual need to do their share. Worthless products nobody wants and a drunk, lazy population with no desire to do better. People standing a line all day to get some toilet paper instead of being productive.
originally posted by: stinkelbaum
a reply to: 8675309jenny
Are you actually serious? Do you even hear yourself? Living in the nanny-state UK has so brainwashed you with the leftist agenda that you actually believe someONE or some entity has a RIGHT to control how successful a person can be
you are aware we havent had a left wing government since the 70's, blair renamed labour 'new labour' and shifted the party to center right.
many true socialists then voted liberal democrat as they became the most left leaning party, hence their rise.
corbyn is trying to shift the party back to a left wing standing but, too many blairites unwilling to shift are killing the party.
originally posted by: Puppylove
a reply to: angeldoll
So slavery isn't slavery then? A slave is bought, given shelter and fed, in exchange for doing the work demanded of him. So even though the man has no choice. It's just work, right? It's all a matter of perspective? The slave should be happy with his work?
We all need food and water to live. When simple food and water is all you get for your labor you are a slave, unless the only one you are feeding is yourself.
At no point in the above analogy was there any implication the person was being paid or given anything else but the basic essentials he needed to live, and while doing that, he was providing for someone else who's only action was to teach him to fish then use that to hold him as a slave for life by making his very livelihood dependent on feeding him a fish before he could have his own.
That's slavery.
The only way we will ever be free is when food and water become a given right. Once food, water and basic shelter are met, then earnings for work can start. One should not be forced to work or die. That's slavery. We should be trying to move beyond that.
originally posted by: intrptr
a reply to: 8675309jenny
Thats not what member was saying...
are you a slaver over someone, by any chance?
originally posted by: Puppylove
a reply to: Blaine91555
Here's the thing. You still reward work. You just start without starvation. I don't buy into the feed and shelter people and they just lie down and get fat idea. That's only true if there's no incentive to work.
Which is why you still pay people to work. See when people work to eat they are being punished/forced to work. Once you take that away and work starts of as a net gain rather than trying to get above water, you're rewarding people to work.
Will some be lazy good for nothings? Sure, but we get that anyway.
originally posted by: 8675309jenny
originally posted by: intrptr
a reply to: 8675309jenny
Thats not what member was saying...
are you a slaver over someone, by any chance?
What?
Can you read?
originally posted by: Aazadan
a reply to: ketsuko
The idea that people who don't work don't eat is really only common in western thinking. Others have taken the idea that using the threat of starvation to compel labor from people ultimately leads to slavery and debt.