Clinton Foundation Spent Less Than 6 Percent On Charitable Grants In 2014

originally posted by: WilburnRoach

originally posted by: Xcathdra
a reply to: WilburnRoach

Hypocritical.. just like Clinton -

I could always lie and blame you for Phages response.. just like Hillary would.

Still waiting for Trumps tax returns. Are you?

Not really. I think the IRS are still auditing him. You should start your own thread for that.

Have anything on the topic? I know Clinton supporters like to distract by ignoring the topic and starting in on something unrelated.

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: slider1982

At this moment Hillary is a politician Trump is not

The moment Trump threw his hat into the ring he became a politician.

When he becomes president he will be a politician, at the moment he has zero power to change any laws..

He is running for election nothing more, there is a big difference between the two and lets not get Trump as a candidate to mixed up in this...

Anyone could be her opponent and I still think that if the information shown, (if true) then it stinks... People need to not have their hatred for Trump blurring the obvious issue. 6% spending from a charitable foundation with the assets that are claimed they have is absurd..

RA

a reply to: slider1982

When he becomes president he will be a politician, at the moment he has zero power to change any laws..

So then, Hillary is not a politician either.

originally posted by: Phage
Awesome.

I'm glad that you have already decided that she should be in jail.

Maybe spend more time reading and comprehending and less time on snark and the superiority complex you seem to have tonight... That way you wont continue to make false assumptions or accuse me of something I never said.

Where did I say "she" should be in jail?

a reply to: Xcathdra
Apologies. I must have misunderstood.

How these people are not in prison befuddles the imagination.

a reply to: Phage

Contrary to popular belief the Clinton Foundation and its offshoots are managed / controlled by more than just the 3 Clinton's. Just as ADFA was in Arkansas.

a reply to: Xcathdra

Ok. Thanks for the clarification.
Hillary is not involved.

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: slider1982

When he becomes president he will be a politician, at the moment he has zero power to change any laws..

So then, Hillary is not a politician either.

Trump has never been in a elected Government..

Hillary has been in a elected Government as Secretary of state. Not to mention being a First Lady and then a US senator plus a previous presidency bid..

Can you not see the difference in the two.. One has made Politics a career the other has not..

RA

a reply to: slider1982

Hillary has been in a elected Government as Secretary of state.

The Secretary of State is not elected.

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: slider1982

Hillary has been in a elected Government as Secretary of state.

The Secretary of State is not elected.

Obama "elected" her. The potus.

Slider is english, he's good people.

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: slider1982

Hillary has been in a elected Government as Secretary of state.

The Secretary of State is not elected.

The Government she was involved with was. Plus she was a elected state senator for New york before that.

Margins


Hillary Rodham Clinton Republican Popular vote 3,747,310
Rick Lazio Democratic 2,915,730 Percentage 55% 43% Win for Hillary..


RA

a reply to: burgerbuddy
That would be an appointment then.
Being English is no excuse. They talk funny.

a reply to: slider1982

Plus she was a elected state senator for New york before that.

Too bad you didn't lead with that.

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: slider1982

Plus she was a elected state senator for New york before that.

Too bad you didn't lead with that.

Sorry what???

RA

a reply to: slider1982

Oh. Right. You're English. Language.

You should have started with something accurate instead of inaccurate.

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: Xcathdra

Ok. Thanks for the clarification.
Hillary is not involved.

Your assumption... not mine.
Stop assuming...


Respectfully,
Would it be possible for you to dial down the anal retentive side your expressing tonight. Most everyone knew what he meant with regards to Hillary and Secretary of State. There is no need to do what you are doing other than you possibly being in a bad mood and deciding to take it out on people here.

I would be most appreciative.

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: slider1982

Oh. Right. You're English. Language.

You should have started with something accurate instead of inaccurate.

I think my point is clear...,


RA

a reply to: Xcathdra

Your assumption... not mine.

What am I missing?

Where did I say "she" should be in jail?

I would be most appreciative.

I actually am in a rather fine mood. But I am not here to live up to your expectations..blah. blah blah.

originally posted by: Phage
What am I missing?

Tonight I have no idea.. You appear to be in one of those moods.

originally posted by: Phage
I actually am in a rather fine mood. But I am not here to live up to your expectations..blah. blah blah.

Just to derail the thread with pointless corrections simply because you would rather play English professor than engage the topic.

I have no expectations except to remain on topic and stop the anal retentive bs kick your on tonight.

a reply to: Xcathdra

Ok.

Do you think Hillary should be in prison because of what you posted, or not? I ask because you have seemed to be vague about that. Does "these people" include her, or not?