It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Help ATS via PayPal:
learn more

Was Hillary actually in Greensboro earlier for her speech? (CGI News[?])

page: 14
56
<< 11  12  13   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Sep, 22 2016 @ 07:09 PM
link   

originally posted by: Xenogears

originally posted by: Greggers
a reply to: thepixelpusher

Except in one of those frames, the background visibly shifts. Just a few pixels, but it proves the background changed too.


what about the voice changing to male, and shadows being cast in the distant flag, as well as the camera man that was several meters away, next to the flag appearing to be about the same size as hillary. And the cell phones appearing to be of other events in their screens.


You aren't supposed to notice all of that. Way too many discrepancies, to be written off as simple feed glitches.




posted on Sep, 22 2016 @ 08:34 PM
link   

originally posted by: LadyGreenEyes


No, one single frame was explained, were her head repeated. What about the frames where you don't have that repeating effect, and she's still transparent? In those, the background ought to be distorted, and the flag not visible, but that's not the case.

Yes, those frames have been explained too. Multiple times.

The "repeating head" frames merely make what's happening plainly obvious, but the same mechanism applies to every frame in question. As I said, this has been explained more than once.

Do you need me to refer you to the specific posts?
edit on 22-9-2016 by Greggers because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 22 2016 @ 11:06 PM
link   

originally posted by: Greggers

originally posted by: LadyGreenEyes


No, one single frame was explained, were her head repeated. What about the frames where you don't have that repeating effect, and she's still transparent? In those, the background ought to be distorted, and the flag not visible, but that's not the case.

Yes, those frames have been explained too. Multiple times.

The "repeating head" frames merely make what's happening plainly obvious, but the same mechanism applies to every frame in question. As I said, this has been explained more than once.

Do you need me to refer you to the specific posts?


No, they have not been "explained". Claims have been made, yet not one single person has shown an example of this happening to someone else. Still waiting for those. Show us the athlete vanishing from the screen, as all behind him stays the same. Claims are not the same thing as proof.



posted on Sep, 22 2016 @ 11:39 PM
link   

originally posted by: LadyGreenEyes

originally posted by: Greggers

originally posted by: LadyGreenEyes


No, one single frame was explained, were her head repeated. What about the frames where you don't have that repeating effect, and she's still transparent? In those, the background ought to be distorted, and the flag not visible, but that's not the case.

Yes, those frames have been explained too. Multiple times.

The "repeating head" frames merely make what's happening plainly obvious, but the same mechanism applies to every frame in question. As I said, this has been explained more than once.

Do you need me to refer you to the specific posts?


No, they have not been "explained". Claims have been made, yet not one single person has shown an example of this happening to someone else. Still waiting for those. Show us the athlete vanishing from the screen, as all behind him stays the same. Claims are not the same thing as proof.


You claimed they hadn't been explained. Yes, they have been. What you're asking for now is a corroborating example, which is something entirely different.

The explanation I provided is based upon the insight of industry subject-matter-experts, which is informed by years of working with digital video.

Here are the FACTS:
1) the background in this video was highly uniform
2) the background can be seen "changing," even though most people in this thread appear not to have noticed
3) The top of Hillary's head can clearly be seen tiling all the way down the screen, making it plainly obvious what's happening: what appears to be an "unchanging" background is really just a tiling error.
4) Shift the top of that repeated segment down 3 or 4 rows, and you'd have EXACTLY the effect seen -- a disappearing Hillary and podium.

What you appear to be suggesting is that even though we have PROOF that the background appeared to remain static due to a tiling error, that same basic effect was caused by SOMETHING ELSE ENTIRELY in the other frames.

I think the burden of proof is on you, as quite frankly it's ridiculous.

edit on 23-9-2016 by Greggers because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 25 2016 @ 05:14 PM
link   
Well it seems this isn't the firs time. Check this picture and notice the camera.

imgur.com...



posted on Oct, 26 2016 @ 12:12 AM
link   
a reply to: Belgianbeer

Looks like the same amount of people at the Tim Kaine Rally's...none.



posted on Oct, 26 2016 @ 12:49 AM
link   
a reply to: boncho

Not only was this badly green-screened, but at 45 seconds in you can see her eyes shapeshift. For a single frame you can clearly see that she is a reptile. Unbelievable.

I'm so glad I haven't voted already. I was going to vote for her, but I'm definitely going to vote for Trump now!!




top topics



 
56
<< 11  12  13   >>

log in

join