a reply to: swanne
I meant walking right over the personal business, since intent is varied and not as it seems in some cases with ulterior motives somtimes it's a good
thing to look at in the light of many perspectives as a hypothetical... like what could this person possibly see or have experienced to ellict the
deduction that they have made as a conclusion.
With pure intent it is the thing initself, no ulterior motive it just is as it appears. This is how I operate, and seeing how many do not operate in
such a way it is a good thing to consider to grow in wisdom and understand perspectives not one's own. I used to be very blind to such things because
I do not operate in such a way... and it could be manipulated by those wanting to do so seeing my motive operandi different than theirs which had or
has reasonings for doing like a plot or a game to play.
So I made an assumptive inquiry into it; because the state of the world we are in is due to a lot of people walking right past problems and sometimes
it is done with good judgement like taking the path that does not have briars and requiring a machette to walk through.
Sorry for the personal business derail for a moment awhile back, sometimes such things get so strong as an influence they can interfere with business
or the topic at hand.
But in the larger context of all of that... looking to solve world problems. It appears, some work with pure intent(none) some work with
intent(specific goals and planning) and some have no idea what is going on or why(ignorance and it's a conspiracy to find out)
When looking at the so called TPTB then we know there is an intent a larger picture and many contingencies to make it happen or continue according to
plan. Of course compartmentalization will limit the amount of co-conspirators and that's why we have top secret levels of on a need to know basis.
The ration for such things appears that the world is trying to progress into the future the issue being so very many do not want it to or has an
ideology of control well with many of those forces working against eachother and some of them working with each other... it is like the old reality
shows of last one wins so forming alliances and such and such only to cut their throats later which makes everyone paranoid at the start is this my
friend? Stressful is what all of that is and it is how all of this works on the global scale.
So the question is what is it vying for... domination and supremacy or everyone working together beyond borders... it appears that there are two
extremes batting it back and forth politically no matter the ideological extremes and the economy that both polarities operate by in philosophy.
Eventually it appears the world will be paved over because the future is always occuring in the present moment as it arises from one moment to the
next, and the brakes appear to be how much one is conceptually anchored or being dragged along by the past... making us say progress? or regress?
Then the understanding of the old addage: The more things change the more they stay the same.
The reasoning is of course human nature... but human nature is what will move forward because our animal nature is the regress in which societies try
to thwart but that can appear as extreme control totalitarinism dictators the whole nine yards... when the concept of freedom comes into play... then
it allows for play and enjoyment etc. yet with the global shifting in those polarities of extremes from right to left scales and balances not on the
local or personal experience will appear to be ever in balance making the addage true...
So enters the personal oasis that says to hell with all of you and Robert Frost's oneself in a good fences make good neighbors keep it in your own
back yard and off my front lawn with your children atittude... yes protectionism.
So going from micro to macro we can see how all of this interweaves and over laps from smallest to largest and can mirror eachother.
So the agenda... well in the 50's it was trust the government it will take care of you meaning you wont or cant know the agenda as it's on a need to
know basis but trust that it is in your best interest in a hush lil baby dont say a word.
That just means it quit working for the people itself and into a global effort to stabilize as the US used to be neutral... but so strong and
prosperous that after the world wars all the other strong and prosperous with quasi happy people decided to try to elevate the entire world so no more
famine disease etc. in an attempt to work together and balance trade etc. so that we become a functioning planet.
Ideologies are doing us in and dragging silly old bias and hate that doesn't want to pull up the anchor for better and equality even though many don't
want that from some learned ignorance in pointing the finger at what is a percieved problem instead of looking for solutions or being the solution as
an example of being the change they want to see as a role model in a family to community to globally and no stops inbetween for humanities sake.
It's stormy waters politically as the US elections are so long and drawn out roughly 2 years... that means 2 years of work 2 years of instability as
all of those megaconglomerate corporations and concerns get involved... at the rate things are going it appears the new campaigning will begin as soon
as someone steps foot in office and in my opinion the best campaign is to hunker down and do the job neededing to be done instead of vying for one's
own political foothold due to all the money in politics.
It has bound much of our liquid resources up in political party coffers to fight with each other in agenda and ideology while the populous becomes
destabilized and infrastructure crumbles as a lot os also flowing across borders... which isn't a bad thing but where is that line of protectionism?
When bottom is a child is laying on the ground covered in flies and top is skuttling around in yahchts big enough to house an entire towns population?
The middle erroding quicker and quicker or balance in the mad dash or scramble. The strong always survive and protect the meek and that's why they are
said to inherit the earth... because fear of the whole occurs when one feels safe and confortable in their own oasis or self protection bubble
protecting only themselves having embraced that dog eat dog mentality and that imbalance is just the nature of the world itself... not seeing that
they are at the extreme that could actually help the most, if such notions were lay down and well generals aside many do and it goes unspoken, but
then just as many don't.
Well, back to the dance...