It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Help ATS via PayPal:
learn more

No time for Evolution?

page: 8
1
<< 5  6  7    9  10  11 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Sep, 17 2016 @ 09:56 PM
link   
a reply to: TerryDon79

Just common sense if you know anything about Science.

The reason why everyone is rushing to a multiverse or a cyclical universe is because the Cosmological Constant was fine tuned to 120 decimal places and the theory as to what it should be was off by 58 decimal places. Scientist knew this couldn't occur naturally without some sort of multiverse and they still can't explain how this value naturally occurred or if this constant can take all of these different values.

If we find that at the heart of the Origin of Life is a value that's fine tuned to 70 decimal places then you will see theories popping up called The Theory of Parallel Evolution LOL!

Like you said, EVOLUTION MUST HAVE LIFE!!!




posted on Sep, 17 2016 @ 09:57 PM
link   
a reply to: TerryDon79

Ya see?
What am I doing wrong?



posted on Sep, 17 2016 @ 10:00 PM
link   
a reply to: neoholographic

Yep. Evolution must have life. Just like morons must insist on misrepresenting science to fit a warped agenda.

Also, care to show me the evidence for "The reason why everyone is rushing to a multiverse or a cyclical universe" having anything to do with evolution?

Multiverses don't necessarily have life, let alone our carbon copies with a few differences.

Cyclical universe theories only state that there's a infinite loop of great expansions and contractions. It says nothing about life.

I guess this is just more false assumptions by someone who doesn't know science.



posted on Sep, 17 2016 @ 10:01 PM
link   

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: TerryDon79

Ya see?
What am I doing wrong?


Not listening enough to the great poker player of all time.

Kenny Rogers.

You need to know when to hold em, know when to fold em.



posted on Sep, 17 2016 @ 10:03 PM
link   
a reply to: TerryDon79

I prefer this one:



posted on Sep, 17 2016 @ 10:04 PM
link   
a reply to: Phage

No wonder you keep losing.



posted on Sep, 17 2016 @ 10:04 PM
link   
a reply to: TerryDon79

I must be talking over your head because I have no idea what you're responding to. Maybe you should read my post again and this time slower.

The Multiverse comment is just an example as to why the Origin of Life is so important. We can't talk about randomness without knowing Life's Origins.



posted on Sep, 17 2016 @ 10:06 PM
link   
a reply to: neoholographic

The multiverse hypothesis has nothing to do with life. It's about the possibilities of their being multiple universes. That's it. Says nothing about life at all.



posted on Sep, 17 2016 @ 10:06 PM
link   

originally posted by: TerryDon79
a reply to: Phage

No wonder you keep losing.

Wrong universe?



posted on Sep, 17 2016 @ 10:07 PM
link   

originally posted by: Phage

originally posted by: TerryDon79
a reply to: Phage

No wonder you keep losing.

Wrong universe?


Wrong timeline.



posted on Sep, 17 2016 @ 10:08 PM
link   
a reply to: TerryDon79

Are you serious?

Time to take a break because it's obvious you don't know what I'm saying. Maybe when I come back I will se a response to my post.



posted on Sep, 17 2016 @ 10:10 PM
link   

originally posted by: TerryDon79

originally posted by: Phage

originally posted by: TerryDon79
a reply to: Phage

No wonder you keep losing.

Wrong universe?


Wrong timeline.

So, the good cards are...just..out...of...reach.
Dang.

I'll stick to cribbage then. It works for me in this stream.

edit on 9/17/2016 by Phage because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 17 2016 @ 10:10 PM
link   
a reply to: neoholographic

Yes, I'm serious.

You've obviously not studied multiverse hypothesis and the infinity loop hypothesis very well. Neither say anything about life, only about the universe forming and existing.

Or are you on about your own hypothesis? I'm sure if you present it to a real scientist they'll be able to laugh at you face to face, rather than me doing it over the Internet.



posted on Sep, 17 2016 @ 10:11 PM
link   

originally posted by: Phage

originally posted by: TerryDon79

originally posted by: Phage

originally posted by: TerryDon79
a reply to: Phage

No wonder you keep losing.

Wrong universe?


Wrong timeline.

So, the good cards are...just..out...of...reach.
Dang.

I'll stick to cribbage then.


The good cards are like tomorrow. It just never comes.

I haven't played crib in years!
edit on 1792016 by TerryDon79 because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 17 2016 @ 10:15 PM
link   
a reply to: TerryDon79
Actually, tomorrow does come. All too soon.
But Tomorrow Never Knows.



posted on Sep, 17 2016 @ 10:16 PM
link   
a reply to: Phage

Tomorrow can't come. As soon as it's tomorrow, it's today. That would make tomorrow the day after today ad infinitum.



posted on Sep, 17 2016 @ 10:16 PM
link   
a reply to: TerryDon79

Tell that to my alarm clock.



posted on Sep, 17 2016 @ 10:18 PM
link   
a reply to: Phage

Your alarm clock wakes you up today. Which was tomorrow yesterday and yesterday the day after tomorrow if tomorrow is today.
edit on 1792016 by TerryDon79 because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 17 2016 @ 10:20 PM
link   
a reply to: TerryDon79

Groundhog Day?



posted on Sep, 17 2016 @ 10:20 PM
link   

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: TerryDon79

Groundhog Day?


After trying to figure out how to type it, it's now headache day.



new topics

top topics



 
1
<< 5  6  7    9  10  11 >>

log in

join