It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: whereislogic
a reply to: Krahzeef_Ukhar
It's the evolutionary philosophers promoting evolutonary philosophies that are labeling everything as evolution:
According to their terminology, it's all evolution (otherwise you shouldn't be calling it evolution, the terms listed above are also all based on the same core philosophy, 'Mother Nature did it' and philosophical naturalism).
I think the unreasonable behaviour of the adherents of these evolutionary philosophies is weakening their claims considerably. How long can people stick their head in the sand regarding how the word "evolution" is actually used by the promoters of evolutionary philosophers? Their gurus.
originally posted by: Barcs
Origin of life= chemistry. Evolution = biology.
And I remember your comment accusing me of making up definitions for the word "design" when I used a shortened version of a definition found in the Oxford dictionary and 2 or 3 dictionaries I found when googling "design dictionary".
I marvel at your creativity and thinkig so far outside the box, I can't even see La La Land anymore if I try to follow.
I shudder to think at any dictionary actually defining biology as evolution and chemistry as the origin of life.
originally posted by: neoholographic
Scientist don't know why life evolves the way it does. They can only understand the process but they can't know why without the Origin of Life.
Look at your example of gravity. Yes, we can understand gravity but we can't know why gravity exists without knowing the Origins. This is why you have theories of quantum gravity or theories that say gravity is an emergent property. So we can have an understanding of gravity but we don't know why it exists because we don't know the Origins.