It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
On my most recent trip to Saudi Arabia, I was greeted with a startling confession. In the past, when we raised the issue of funding Islamic extremists with the Saudis, all we got were denials. This time, in the course of meetings with King Salman, Crown Prince Nayef, Deputy Crown Mohammad Bin Salman and several ministers, one top Saudi official admitted to me, “We misled you.” He explained that Saudi support for Islamic extremism started in the early 1960s as a counter to Nasserism—the socialist political ideology that came out of the thinking of Egypt’s Gamal Abdel Nasser—which threatened Saudi Arabia and led to war between the two countries along the Yemen border. This tactic allowed them to successfully contain Nasserism, and the Saudis concluded that Islamism could be a powerful tool with broader utility. ...
But over time, the Saudis say, their support for extremism turned on them, metastasizing into a serious threat to the Kingdom and to the West. They had created a monster that had begun to devour them. “We did not own up to it after 9/11 because we feared you would abandon or treat us as the enemy,” the Saudi senior official conceded. “And we were in denial.”
Everyone knows Saudi's hands were all over it, it's Tel Aviv and Washington that this "admission" is meant to protect.
The Senate bill is intended to make clear that the immunity given to foreign nations under the law should not apply in cases where nations are found culpable for terrorist attacks that kill Americans on United States soil. If the bill were to pass both houses of Congress and be signed by the president, it could clear a path for the role of the Saudi government to be examined in the Sept. 11 lawsuits.
originally posted by: Reverbs
a reply to: ThingsThatDontMakeSense
Something weird going on behind the scenes between April and now.. Something changed.
That's actually a really interesting article.
It speaks a lot more on Saudis plans for the future of their own country and of terrorism and islamism..
Kind of seems weirdly promising.
And now I can't read my ads on the the right side of ATS because they are in arabic.
LOL
but it doesn't even seem to make sense..
Saudi Arabia Warns of Economic Fallout if Congress Passes 9/11 Bill
April 2016 New York Times
The new Saudi leadership, in other words, appears to be downgrading ideology in favor of modernization. In fact, one senior Saudi official explicitly said that the Kingdom was pursuing a “revolution under the cover of modernization”—meaning that modernization was now the driver of Saudi policy.
....
A true change in Saudi Arabia’s policy of supporting Islamist extremists would be a turning point in the effort to defeat them. Given the kingdom’s role, Saudi success can provide a model for the rest of the Sunni Arab and Islamic world on how to pursue reform and succeed. That could, in turn, help launch the reformation that is so badly needed. The region and the world have a stake in Saudi success, and should do what we can to encourage and support them on this new path.
originally posted by: desert
a reply to: ThingsThatDontMakeSense
Thanks for thread. This is a big deal.
Finally! Took awhile. But at least it's a big step in the right direction. "Hi, I'm Saudi Arabia and I have a problem with my Muslim extremists."
Younger generation of leaders.
originally posted by: DigitalVigilante420
a reply to: ThingsThatDontMakeSense
I call red-herring to deflect from other key players. Everyone knows Saudi's hands were all over it, it's Tel Aviv and Washington that this "admission" is meant to protect.
To me it's obvious...
originally posted by: AgarthaSeed
What is Saudi Arabia getting in return for playing a patsy?
I see this like the convicted felon who tries to make a good appearance at his parole hearing.
originally posted by: desert
a reply to: ThingsThatDontMakeSense
I see this like the convicted felon who tries to make a good appearance at his parole hearing.
Prince Bandar bin Sultan.... it's all in the family over there, so I won't expect much, not even "palace arrest", although that would be nice. He already was let go of his govt work, so, yeah, let him stay in his palace, prevent him from any power in the family.
originally posted by: DigitalVigilante420
a reply to: ThingsThatDontMakeSense
I call red-herring to deflect from other key players. Everyone knows Saudi's hands were all over it, it's Tel Aviv and Washington that this "admission" is meant to protect.
To me it's obvious...