It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
A former female Muslim police officer has accused London’s Metropolitan police of being more worried about “political correctness” than tackling the extremist views of some Muslim officers because they fear being branded “Islamophobic.”
Speaking to the Sunday Times, Javaria Saeed, who worked for the Metropolitan police’s counterterrorism department, took exception to comments made by a Muslim constable who said that female genital mutilation was a “clean an honorable practice” that “shouldn’t be criminalized.”
The 35-year-old resigned from the capital’s police force in March after she became disillusioned by “political correctness,” which resulted in a culture of “us and them” to emerge among some Muslim officers who believed themselves to be above the law.
“My experiences were that it was Muslim officers being racist towards my individual views; also in private, holding racist views against white officers, and sexist views against females,” she said, speaking to the Sunday Times. “If such views were held and expressed by white officers, they would be fired.”
originally posted by: 727Sky
Political correctness in the police force of London has become a problem even for a female Muslim officer. It got so bad she has resigned due to other Muslim officer's extreme views. Just one story from one person however I believe it. Many countries in the Muslim world forbid women working outside the home.. Plus doing a perceived man's job.. I bet she did get a bunch of B.S. from her fellow Muslim officers..
www.rt.com...
A former female Muslim police officer has accused London’s Metropolitan police of being more worried about “political correctness” than tackling the extremist views of some Muslim officers because they fear being branded “Islamophobic.”
Speaking to the Sunday Times, Javaria Saeed, who worked for the Metropolitan police’s counterterrorism department, took exception to comments made by a Muslim constable who said that female genital mutilation was a “clean an honorable practice” that “shouldn’t be criminalized.”
The 35-year-old resigned from the capital’s police force in March after she became disillusioned by “political correctness,” which resulted in a culture of “us and them” to emerge among some Muslim officers who believed themselves to be above the law.
“My experiences were that it was Muslim officers being racist towards my individual views; also in private, holding racist views against white officers, and sexist views against females,” she said, speaking to the Sunday Times. “If such views were held and expressed by white officers, they would be fired.”
originally posted by: MichiganSwampBuck
I think that people should replace the PC fear of Islamophobia with facts about the core beliefs of Islam and the history of how it has been applied. One huge mistake that has been and is being made is that Islam considers any act of kindness or mercy by the unbelievers to be a weakness that should be taken advantage of in order to advance their own power base. Also, it is a common Islamic belief that it is OK to lie to unbelievers when the believers are at a disadvantage. A good example is when, during a conflict, Muslims will enter into a peace agreement when they are losing, knowing full well that they will break that agreement as soon as they are strong enough to fight again. Peace is not an end unto itself, but a means to gain an advantage over the unbelievers.
Also, when they are living in an area where they are out numbered by unbelievers, they will contend that Islam is a religion of peace and tolerance and will abide by the local laws and customs until they have a large enough population to become a political influence and change them. Once they reach a certain percentage of the population and political influence they will use force and coercion to finally take over and change it over to pure Islamic rule. Once they have taken over an area, the peaceful and tolerant aspects are only applied to other believers, leaving the infidels outside of the protection of their laws.
originally posted by: Britguy
originally posted by: MichiganSwampBuck
I think that people should replace the PC fear of Islamophobia with facts about the core beliefs of Islam and the history of how it has been applied. One huge mistake that has been and is being made is that Islam considers any act of kindness or mercy by the unbelievers to be a weakness that should be taken advantage of in order to advance their own power base. Also, it is a common Islamic belief that it is OK to lie to unbelievers when the believers are at a disadvantage. A good example is when, during a conflict, Muslims will enter into a peace agreement when they are losing, knowing full well that they will break that agreement as soon as they are strong enough to fight again. Peace is not an end unto itself, but a means to gain an advantage over the unbelievers.
Also, when they are living in an area where they are out numbered by unbelievers, they will contend that Islam is a religion of peace and tolerance and will abide by the local laws and customs until they have a large enough population to become a political influence and change them. Once they reach a certain percentage of the population and political influence they will use force and coercion to finally take over and change it over to pure Islamic rule. Once they have taken over an area, the peaceful and tolerant aspects are only applied to other believers, leaving the infidels outside of the protection of their laws.
A bit like Judaism then?
I view ALL religion based supremacy and self importance as nothing more than force-fed delusions used for political and personal gain.
originally posted by: and14263
a reply to: 727Sky
All this over a religion. Such worldwide madness all because of a cult and a god nobody can prove exists.
Disclaimer: All religions are cults.
originally posted by: MarioOnTheFly
a reply to: yuppa
Aetheism should be classed as a cult as well.
A cult is normally lead by a central leader correct?
Following your logic...so who is the atheism central leader figure ?