It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Help ATS via PayPal:
learn more

Trump Will Win All 50 States...Here's Why !!!

page: 3
35
<< 1  2    4  5  6 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Sep, 11 2016 @ 08:39 PM
link   

originally posted by: mOjOm

originally posted by: whyamIhere
He's never been in political office.

He admits buying politicians off.

He was a businessman. That's what they do.

It's all corrupt, I'm not handing out free passes.



Yeah, well pedophiles rape little kids.

That's what they do.

That doesn't mean it's ok or allowed though is it???

You're saying it's fine that Business Men Buy Politicians. So you're Pro-Corruption.

Why would anyone take the advice of someone who's Pro-Corruption???

Also, you have no credibility if you're Pro-Corruption nor can you be taken seriously if you're Pro-Corruption.

You complain because Clinton is Corrupt. But you love Trump for it. Explain that to me???


Get ahold of yourself...

Pro-Corruption ? What are you drunk ?

Wake up.




posted on Sep, 11 2016 @ 08:42 PM
link   
a reply to: whyamIhere

Ok. Let me break it down real easy for you then.

Buying Politicians is a form of Corruption.

Trump Admits to Buying Politicians.

Therefor Trump is participating in Corruption.

So if you support Trump you are Pro-Corruption.


It's really rather simple.



posted on Sep, 11 2016 @ 08:46 PM
link   

originally posted by: mOjOm
a reply to: whyamIhere

Ok. Let me break it down real easy for you then.

Buying Politicians is a form of Corruption.

Trump Admits to Buying Politicians.

Therefor Trump is participating in Corruption.

So if you support Trump you are Pro-Corruption.


It's really rather simple.


Trump has never held office. He bought influence.

Hillary, has 15,000 pages of the most corrupt pay for play system,

Ever seen in DC. That's saying something.

To compare the two is like Al Capone to Pee Wee Herman.



posted on Sep, 11 2016 @ 08:51 PM
link   
Saying Reagan created NAFTA is like saying Romney created Obamacare. They were ideas in the beginning that were created to help the people of the country. In both cases, after the Progressive Left took hold, they were not to good for us regular folk.

This election will very much be like 1980.



posted on Sep, 11 2016 @ 08:57 PM
link   

originally posted by: whyamIhere

Trump has never held office. He bought influence.

Hillary, has 15,000 pages of the most corrupt pay for play system,

Ever seen in DC. That's saying something.

To compare the two is like Al Capone to Pee Wee Herman.


It doesn't matter if he's held office or not.

He's still bribing Politicians. That is the heart of Political Corruption.

I'm not comparing him and Clinton either.

He is part of the System of Corruption within Politics and admits to it. Those who he buys are also part of it too, whoever they are. It takes both for it to work.

If either side refused to play along then that form of corruption wouldn't be happening.

You're just avoiding the whole point of what I'm saying and pretending not to see what is clearly obvious.

So let's try it again.

Trump buying Politicians is a form of Corruption.

Therefore Trump participates in Political Corruption.

So he is Pro-Corruption by his own participation within it.

If you support Trump then you too are Pro-Corruption.

This isn't about Hillary so don't bother bringing it up.



posted on Sep, 11 2016 @ 09:02 PM
link   
a reply to: mOjOm

Of course he's part of the system.

He gave legal donations to politicians.

If you know of bribes and payoffs submit your evidence.

I don't care about the football helmet either...



posted on Sep, 11 2016 @ 09:23 PM
link   
A president is not a supreme being who controls all facets of the planet. The number of factors that has been leading to the decline of society are too many to count.

And all 50 states.... hell that is reaching



posted on Sep, 11 2016 @ 09:24 PM
link   
a reply to: whyamIhere

He says it himself.






“I was a businessman, I give to everybody. When they call, I give. And you know what? When I need something from them two years later, three years later, I call them, they are there for me. And that’s a broken system.”



posted on Sep, 11 2016 @ 09:24 PM
link   
a reply to: mOjOm

I guess, who's fault is it?

similar scenario...

tax dodgers.

Who's at fault?

the people who wrote the loopholes, or the people utilizing them?

I'm going with the former.

The politicians have continued to vote higher pay and have legalized bribery.

Why not use their service?



posted on Sep, 11 2016 @ 09:29 PM
link   
a reply to: mOjOm

What Trump did was legal.

What Hillary did wasn't.

You can't fault a man playing the game.

He didn't write the rules.

He exploited them. I want a person like that incharge.



posted on Sep, 11 2016 @ 09:36 PM
link   
a reply to: Mandroid7

Well, first of all the ones writing them are also the ones using them. That's why they wrote them or paid to have them written in the first place.

That isn't a true comparison though in this case. You're comparing a legal loophole with bribery. Bribery takes Two Parties. One paying the money and another to accept it in trade for a political favor. This is what creates those loopholes in the first place.

Both parties are at fault. The one paying the money and the one taking it. Both make up that type of Corruption. If one didn't pay or the other didn't take it wouldn't happen.

Stop denying what is obvious and admit you are pro-corruption as long as you benefit from it somehow. Or stand against Corruption. Those are the choices. To try and Support Trump and his Corruption while condemning the corruption of anyone else for the same make you a hypocrite. There is no way to avoid it.



posted on Sep, 11 2016 @ 09:43 PM
link   

originally posted by: whyamIhere

What Trump did was legal.

What Hillary did wasn't.

You can't fault a man playing the game.

He didn't write the rules.

He exploited them. I want a person like that incharge.



It's the same game. Even Trump himself is saying it's a Broken System which needs to change.

He was in favor of exploiting a broken system when it favored him. Not if it favors others.

This doesn't make him a f*cking hero or a man just playing the game.

It makes him a corrupt POS just like every other corrupt POS who's doing it now or has in the past or will in the future.

Why do you think he points out that he "Was a Businessman" when he participated in it. But now that he's a Presidential Candidate it's now something to be concerned about.

What's wrong with your brain???

He's just as corrupt as the people he's buying.



posted on Sep, 11 2016 @ 09:49 PM
link   
a reply to: mOjOm

I used to work for this millionaire Bank owner.

I sat at his desk on day and looked at his mail.

He got platinum supporter letters from both parties.

When he came back I laughed at him that he couldn't make up his mind.

He looked me right in the eyes and said,

"If you know who's going to win you could save me money.

I looked at him he added "Don't be wrong"...



posted on Sep, 11 2016 @ 10:00 PM
link   
a reply to: whyamIhere

So your final point is that you once worked for a POS billionaire Bank Owner who was corrupt and wealthy enough to buy both sides of the political system to ensure he'd be getting favors no matter who won???

You'll have to excuse me for not seeing how this is supposed to help your argument.



posted on Sep, 11 2016 @ 11:29 PM
link   
Reagan ran a campaign on unity, on compromise, on working together. Trumps campaign is the exact opposite. The only thing Reagan and Trump have in common is the cut taxes and raise spending and let some other generation pay for it. Reagan built a great coalition of supporters from all races, incomes, educations, sex, religion etc. Trump has done the exact opposite. Trump at best will win a couple less states than Romney.



posted on Sep, 11 2016 @ 11:58 PM
link   
Corruption is A-Okay when Donald Trump does it.

When Clinton is accused of something....Lock her up!

Gotta Love it.



posted on Sep, 12 2016 @ 12:15 AM
link   
a reply to: MrSpad

You missed the point of getting rid of agencies and bureaucracy.
Many an appointee will be fired or ditched if they don't have a function,or have Obama loyalty,same with the current military command structures less officers more NCOs.



posted on Sep, 12 2016 @ 12:48 AM
link   
When it's all said and done...it's the electoral college that will ultimately decided who the president will be.

Trump has some ground to make up and if he continues to alienate that power establishment, he will lose ala Al Gore. All the BS popularity polls are useless.

electiongraphs.com...

It gets old having to repeat myself constantly. Try and keep up!
edit on 12-9-2016 by olaru12 because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 12 2016 @ 02:08 AM
link   
Jill Stein anyone?



posted on Sep, 12 2016 @ 02:48 AM
link   
a reply to: cavtrooper7

Advocating for military/government purges?

That's some wonderful terrible governance. Increasing unemployment is a good thing now?



new topics

top topics



 
35
<< 1  2    4  5  6 >>

log in

join