9/11 Suspects: General Ralph Eberhart

911 Anniversary: Remember the Lies. Never forget them. Maybe soon some miracle will occur and we can have a Nuremburg type trial and the truth can come out

With the 15th anniversary of the mass murder carried out by some sinister secret cabal and not 19 Arab jihadists we need to be reminded of the group of liars who rather than being prosecuted for their complicity were rather rewarded!

Please hear this short video that sheds light on the event



www.activistpost.com...
www.youtube.com...

a reply to: Willtell

There is a thread up on James corbett's series www.abovetopsecret.com...

Only 30 seconds until the first falsehood in this video. That's pretty good for a 9/11 truth video, but then again, there was no speaking or text for the first 20 seconds. But there are many others soon to follow.

Falsehood #1: four hijacked airliners flew over "the most sensitive airspace in the United States."
The airspace the hijacked airliners flew through was controlled airspace and not as sensitive as airspace such as Temporary Flight Restrictions that may include airshows, sporting events, and VIP appearances etc. Other airspace that would be considered more "sensitive" is prohibited areas and restricted areas. More importantly is the Air Defense Identification Zone (ADIZ) which is the area off the coast of the United States that NORAD was actually tasked to monitor and defend against threats coming through it into the United States. This statement is made only to fool the ignorant and gullible.

Falsehood #2: the four hijacked airliners flew for "109 minutes."
The longest any of the flights lasted after being hijacked was 46 minutes.

I'm going to skip some of the more obvious falsehoods like the video's creator saying that NORAD failed their mission of defending American airspace from hijacked airliners when that was never part of their mission and NORAD's complete lack of response that morning.

Falsehood #3: "Although Eberhart’s version of events was cemented into place as the official story of 9/11 propounded by the 9/11 commission, they are in fact self-serving lies." Exactly the opposite of what is claimed here happened. The Commission did not "propound" Ebethart's version of events, it showed that they were wrong. Good grief.

Falsehood #4: "In Eberhart’s version of events, NORAD is completely subordinate to the FAA. In reality, however, NORAD is specifically tasked with dealing with such events itself, not waiting passively for FAA orders. NORAD’s own regulations for dealing with hijacked jets specifically state that 'FAA Authorization for Interceptor Operations is not used for intercept and airborne surveillance of hijacked aircraft within the [continental United States].'" The very document he uses to show that NORAD is not subordinate to the FAA says that they are, in fact, subordinate to the FAA when it comes to hijackings. Remember, this document is titled "NORAD Directive 55-7" and it dictates how the commander-in-chief of NORAD (Gen. Eberhart's command on 9/11) is expected to respond to a hijacking. Here's the relevant part:

AIRBORNE SURVEILLANCE OF HIJACKED AIRCRAFT

This regulation defines how North American Aerospace Defense (NORAD) forces
carry out airborne surveillance of hijacked aircraft and aircraft used without
authorization within the NORAD system...

b. Escort missions are requested by the FAA or TC.
…
(2) When the situation requires an expedited departure, escort
aircraft are given priority over other departing aircraft. The FAA
Authorization for Interceptor Operations (AFIO) is not used for intercept and
airborne surveillance of hijacked aircraft within the CONUS.
…
(b) When the hijacked aircraft is within FAA radar coverage,
escort aircraft is controlled by the appropriate FAA facility.

That's all for now even though there are several more issues that need to be straightened out.

How the videos creator is considered an authority in 9/11 conspiracy theories is beyond me.

a reply to: Willtell

And just where did it say he could shoot down a civilian airliner without up stairs approval ?

You can find a lot of people who could have done more.
But that doesn't mean they were part of some grand conspiracy.

a reply to: Willtell

Just found a great pic and wanted to post it here

I can't let this bald-faced lie pass without correcting it.

Rather than accepting blame for his command’s complete lack of response that morning,

The "complete lack of response" Corbett claims happened by NORAD includes directly violating the rules and regulations that govern the military's response to hijackings along with many other actions. Here's a list of some of them:

Gen. Larry Arnold's bypassing of NORAD HQ, the National Military Command Center and the Secretary of Defense when he gave NEADS permission to launch fighters without going through the proper military chain of command and civilian oversight.

Gen. Ralph Eberhart's bypassing of the NMCC and the Secretary of Defense when he gave CONR permission to launch fighters without going through the proper military chain of command and civilian oversight.

NEADS gave the Otis fighters a scramble order 8 minutes after they were made aware of the first hijacking and had air defense fighters in the air before the impact of Flight 175.

NEADS had three fighters from Langley Air Force Base airborne before they were made aware of the third hijacking.

NORAD ordered all air defense aircraft to battle stations before they were made aware of the fourth hijacking.

There are many, many more examples to be given but these should suffice for now.

James Corbett is dumping out big piles of steamers and it's apparent from the comments on the video that the conspiracy believers are eating them up without even a basic smell test before they do. Sad really.