It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Aldakoopa
a reply to: InspectorGadget13
I have always hated insurance. With the amount I have spent on insurance since I started driving, I could have bought another car already! And then they raise my rates over $100 more when my new car was 2 years old, since it was "no longer new", so it no longer qualifies for the "new car discount". No, it wasn't a 'discount'. It was an excuse to charge me more money!
I have never personally made a claim or been in an accident. I've never even had a ticket before in my life, and I could easily take care of mine and anyone else's car if I ever did get in an accident that was my fault. Why can't I insure myself?
originally posted by: Aldakoopa
I work in a body shop, and so I have to not only deal with making the customers happy, but also be the middle-man between them and their insurance. Basically when someone comes for an estimate, the insurance companies want to review that information and cut costs wherever possible (they never pay us enough to cover the cost of paint material, for instance). That's bad enough, but the past few years have been getting worse.
Insurance companies used to send out an adjuster to the field, and he or she would go around to the various body shops in their area, or sometimes even go to the customer's house or workplace to look at a vehicle and write their own estimates, take pictures to review later, etc. That way, we could usually show them everything we found, and they'd add it to their estimate usually, and if we had a problem later we could get a supplement if we missed or couldn't see something major until we started removing or repairing parts.
Now, however, most insurance companies are no longer sending out adjusters to the field, but rather having the customer or the body shop take pictures, write up an estimate, and email it to them. Adjusters now spend most of their time in an office, rather than going out to look at the vehicles they're supposed to be taking care of for their customers. Since my boss is old fashioned and not tech-savvy in any way, I am the one who has to take the pictures, scan his estimate, and email it to the adjusters. Sometimes I have a direct email to the adjuster who is handling the claim, but other companies have a general catch-all email that you send it to.
This doesn't sound so difficult on the surface, but in reality, those pictures don't do justice to an accident. If there is a small bend in somebody's fender or door that we need to fix, I have to try to get some crazy angle on the pictures so that it reflects light just right for the bend to actually show up. Sometimes you still can't even tell it's there, especially if it's on a white car. For particularly bad accidents, I have to take many pictures to show every single part that needs to be repaired or replaced, and WHY it needs to be repaired or replaced. Then they want a picture of the mileage, VIN number, and the rest of the car so they can determine what the vehicle is worth, in case it's totaled.
This means that sometimes I have a couple dozen pictures I need to send in an email... but guess what; You can only attach so much to an email, and every server is different in the amount of attachments that can be handled. So, sometimes I can send just a few pictures in one or two emails and be fine, but other times I have to attach and send every individual god-forsaken picture in it's own email. What's worse is that I don't know the limits of the server I'm sending to, and generally don't receive feedback from the server until a few days have past that the attachments were too large. Then I have to send it all over again, but break it down into smaller chunks, or make the pictures smaller, or whatever. It's annoying and takes way too much time to do.
One particular case we're dealing with right now, we have taken pictures and sent them along with our estimate. Then the adjuster called us to tell us that they don't see any damage to the bumper (white car, go figure) so they're not paying us anything for the damage on that, and they found a taillight for $200 rather than the genuine OEM replacement we put on our estimate since this is a brand new car, which costs $450 from the manufacturer. So now we have to take more pictures to hopefully show the damage on the bumper since they can't see it in the picture of our email, and they're surely not coming to look at in in person since they're in Pennsylvania and we're in North Carolina, so we can only try it again and argue with them some more.
I'm sure the reasoning behind this was to save money by needing less adjusters to cover a larger area, since they wouldn't be out in the field anymore and could technically do it from anywhere in the country, since it's all electronic, and also to not have to provide them a vehicle and fuel, plus maintenance and insurance on that vehicle as well. That sounds great for their bottom line, but they've basically put more work on the body shops, and made their customers do the run-around in order to operate this way. It may be saving them money but it's costing us more than ever, especially since they short us on so much in the first place.
There are only a couple of insurance companies that still send out adjusters, and I appreciate them more than ever now. But to the others... PLEASE STOP THIS NONSENSE.
originally posted by: Aldakoopa
There are only a couple of insurance companies that still send out adjusters, and I appreciate them more than ever now. But to the others... PLEASE STOP THIS NONSENSE.
originally posted by: Aldakoopa
a reply to: InspectorGadget13
I have never personally made a claim or been in an accident. I've never even had a ticket before in my life, and I could easily take care of mine and anyone else's car if I ever did get in an accident that was my fault. Why can't I insure myself?