It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Help ATS via PayPal:
learn more

Long time Conservative publication, Dallas Morning News, endorses Hillary Clinton

page: 2
9
<< 1    3  4 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Sep, 8 2016 @ 12:52 PM
link   
a reply to: kruphix

He'll take Texas by double digits, guaranteed.




posted on Sep, 8 2016 @ 12:52 PM
link   
a reply to: kruphix

Why do you want a Ruling Establishment pick to win, and a non-Ruling Establishment dude to get skewered? Why isn't this the biggest issue (whether or not its a vote between Douche & Turd)?



posted on Sep, 8 2016 @ 12:52 PM
link   
It's just more proof Trump is anti-establishment. People fear change. It's time to go out with the old (established) and in with the new (outsider).



posted on Sep, 8 2016 @ 12:56 PM
link   

originally posted by: Olivine
The Dallas Morning News has over 400,000 subscribers...


Yeah, I subscribe to Alaska Dispatch News, doesn't mean I would ever consider voting the way that fishwrap's liberal POS owner Alice Rogoff or her equally liberal band of editors report I should vote.

It's not bluster, it's the knowledge that the world is changing. Trust in media and other establishment opinion directors is dropping worldwide. The average American is more likely to throw up a middle finger and do exactly the opposite of what their newscaster advises them to do.



posted on Sep, 8 2016 @ 12:58 PM
link   
a reply to: kruphix

I'm not a Trump supporter; I won't be voting in this election, or possibly any more of them.

Its my take that this newspaper probably understands that Trump isn't genuinely qualified to be POTUS and as well, I'd guess the paper has moved significantly to the left because they now believe that's their audience and they're trying to stay relevant.

Of course Trump will lose the election, a simple look at the Electoral College math tells us that.

But, I had a realization today, and that is that Amerika will elect Clinton, with the help of the DNC machine, but what you don't realize is that if you're a working person and if you live in one of the major metro areas, you'll pay a God awful high price for Clinton's taking POTUS. And frankly, if you vote for HRC, you deserve to pay a horribly high price, and you will pay it and in many, many, different ways.



posted on Sep, 8 2016 @ 12:58 PM
link   

originally posted by: burdman30ott6
a reply to: kruphix

He'll take Texas by double digits, guaranteed.


How do you figure?

He has only polled in the double digits in Texas once...and that was a month ago. Since then, he is in the single digits...and still dropping.



posted on Sep, 8 2016 @ 12:58 PM
link   

originally posted by: IgnoranceIsntBlisss
a reply to: kruphix

Why do you want a Ruling Establishment pick to win, and a non-Ruling Establishment dude to get skewered? Why isn't this the biggest issue (whether or not its a vote between Douche & Turd)?


Who ever said I'm anti-establishment?



posted on Sep, 8 2016 @ 01:00 PM
link   

originally posted by: jjkenobi
It's just more proof Trump is anti-establishment. People fear change. It's time to go out with the old (established) and in with the new (outsider).



I think it is more of people fear crazy unpredictable candidates running for president.

Trump has almost no redeeming qualities. He appeals to a segment of America that wants to return to the 1920s way of living...that's it.



posted on Sep, 8 2016 @ 01:01 PM
link   

originally posted by: kruphix
Who ever said I'm anti-establishment?


So you're pro-Military Industrial Complex, pro-American Imperialism, pro-Wall Street scam cronies, pro-2 Party Crony System, pro-Private Central Banksters, pro-Globalists, pro-Corporate Crony News Media System, pro-War On Drugs, anti-Native Americans, anti-Grass Root Candidates, etc????

Good to know.
edit on 8-9-2016 by IgnoranceIsntBlisss because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 8 2016 @ 01:08 PM
link   

originally posted by: IgnoranceIsntBlisss

originally posted by: kruphix
Who ever said I'm anti-establishment?


So you're pro-Military Industrial Complex, pro-American Imperialism, pro-Wall Street scam cronies, pro-2 Party Crony System, pro-Private Central Banksters, pro-Globalists, pro-Corporate Crony News Media System, pro-War On Drugs, anti-Native Americans, anti-Grass Root Candidates, etc????

Good to know.


Who said I'm for any of that?

Establishment isn't something you get to personally define for someone else.



posted on Sep, 8 2016 @ 01:09 PM
link   
a reply to: kruphix

WHen the curtain is closed and voters don't have to deal with the directed attack against Trump and Trump supporters, his support will go up. I know quite a few people who will be voting Trump, but flat refuse to verbally confirm that in mixed company or outside of a close circle of like minds simply because they don't wish to deal with the BS.

Me? I've been pretty blunt in saying I do not give a damn what people want to label me as or think of me, so I'm open and honest about it.



posted on Sep, 8 2016 @ 01:09 PM
link   

originally posted by: burdman30ott6
a reply to: kruphix

He'll take Texas by double digits, guaranteed.


He is polling between winning Texas by 6 and losing by 1 Poll: Clinton leads Trump in Texas, what it means for you

If Clinton starts buying ads in Texas you will see he GOP in complete panic. As is Trump is going to have to go work for a state he should not have to. He has no road to 270 right now, losing Texas would wreck the GOP who has been losing ground there but, was expecting to hold on for a couple more decades. Trumps problem with white males with college educations, women, young people, and Hispanics has put Texas in play. Now Clinton has her lock on 270 and is mostly building fire walls to protect them. However as numbers like this come in she, the DNC or the Super Pacs are likely going to make a move seeing a chance to use Trump to drive a final nail in the GOP coffin.



posted on Sep, 8 2016 @ 01:12 PM
link   
a reply to: MrSpad

We'll see come November.



posted on Sep, 8 2016 @ 01:12 PM
link   

originally posted by: burdman30ott6
a reply to: kruphix

WHen the curtain is closed and voters don't have to deal with the directed attack against Trump and Trump supporters, his support will go up. I know quite a few people who will be voting Trump, but flat refuse to verbally confirm that in mixed company or outside of a close circle of like minds simply because they don't wish to deal with the BS.


I see the opposite, even here. Republicans that don't support Trump are swarmed and attacked. I always find it amusing when this martyred crowd do something then accuse others of it.



posted on Sep, 8 2016 @ 01:13 PM
link   
a reply to: kruphix

That's what the Ruling Establishment is/does/want/etc. That's what their puppet news Media pushes/covers up/distracts & diverts US from/etc.

That what the 2 part system represents. That's what "voting" for Hillary is an absolute given of. There's a very real chance Trump isn't all that, as the Ruling's Establishment's Puppet Media works so hard to undermine him from day one. And you along with them.


Quit making this an election of favorite personality. That being the norm 'forever' now is why everything is so screwed up. Who here could articulate a disagreement to that statement?



posted on Sep, 8 2016 @ 01:14 PM
link   

originally posted by: burdman30ott6
a reply to: kruphix

WHen the curtain is closed and voters don't have to deal with the directed attack against Trump and Trump supporters, his support will go up. I know quite a few people who will be voting Trump, but flat refuse to verbally confirm that in mixed company or outside of a close circle of like minds simply because they don't wish to deal with the BS.

Me? I've been pretty blunt in saying I do not give a damn what people want to label me as or think of me, so I'm open and honest about it.


This sounds familiar...pretty sure the same thing was said in 2008 and 2012. Republicans claimed that people were afraid to say they weren't voting for Obama because they would be called racist...this was the big hope for McCain and Romney...but it didn't turn out to be true.

Now you are saying that instead of them being scared of being called racists, they just don't want to look like they are against the Media??? LOL.

You seem rather abrasive on this topic...did you ever stop to think that maybe when you corner someone and start ranting about Trump that people are just uncomfortable with you and will say whatever to get you to stop lecturing?

See...works both ways. Also, anecdotal evidence is a poor measure...and usually only used by those that know the scientific statistical evidence is against them.



posted on Sep, 8 2016 @ 01:21 PM
link   

originally posted by: kruphix
You seem rather abrasive on this topic...


Absolutely I am. My earnings and my rights are at stake here.



posted on Sep, 8 2016 @ 01:21 PM
link   
a reply to: MrSpad

The polls don't matter anymore.... everyone knows they are all rigged, the old polling hoax will not work this year.



posted on Sep, 8 2016 @ 01:39 PM
link   

originally posted by: imitator
a reply to: MrSpad

The polls don't matter anymore.... everyone knows they are all rigged, the old polling hoax will not work this year.



in 2012, the right was saying the polls were "skewed".
turns out they were dead on..same with 08.

now its just complete dismissal instead of saying its wrong?

in 2020, what happens? just say they dont exist..polls are a myth?

the bubble is not healthy.



posted on Sep, 8 2016 @ 01:42 PM
link   

originally posted by: IgnoranceIsntBlisss
a reply to: kruphix

Might it be because he doesn't represent the typical Ruling Establishment, and because of that he's been getting skewered perpetual by the Media, thus having all the typically zombie voters all mixed up?? NAHHHH!


Why do you say he doesn't represent the typical ruling establishment? He was born with a silver spoon in his mouth, lost that money, left lots of investors broke and he dodged the draft for Vietnam - doesn't that make him the typical ruling establishment of the right?



new topics

top topics



 
9
<< 1    3  4 >>

log in

join