Hillary Needed Help During The CIC Forum, Had Ear Piece

originally posted by: DupontDeux
Here is what bothers me, if she did indeed have an earpiece:

Why on earth did she not wear her hair in a manner that would cover her ear? We know from pictures that she CAN wear her hair in such a manner.

Like her or not, she is not stupid, and neither are the people around her - it just does not seem right that they did not bother to conceal the earpiece in every possible way. Heck, they could even have disguised it as part of some fancy earring AND let her hair cover it.

Instead they let it be exposed in a highly lit studio to the gaze of millions of viewers?

No, it does not sit right with me.

Because her attitude about everything she does is, "What does it matter anyway".

When people believe they are untouchable and above the law, they flaunt it.

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: UKTruth

Again, please show me a pic that is proof of something in her ear.

Your pic looks like a close-up of the tragus.

No, it rally isn't the tragus - but whatever.
I've moved on to try and find out WHY she uses earpieces, not whether she uses them and whether this object in her ear was an earpiece.

You moved on because you cannot prove what you claim, while still maintaining that there was something in her ear.

I got ya.

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: UKTruth

Again, please show me a pic that is proof of something in her ear.

Your pic looks like a close-up of the tragus.

No, it rally isn't the tragus - but whatever.
I've moved on to try and find out WHY she uses earpieces, not whether she uses them and whether this object in her ear was an earpiece.

You moved on because you cannot prove what you claim, while still maintaining that there was something in her ear.

I got ya.

No , just keen to understand what was in her ear.

a reply to: UKTruth

It is just the light reflecting inside her ear. Watch the following video and note the reflections off her teeth. It is simply the lighting that is producing the reflection in her ear.

gfycat.com...

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: UKTruth

Again, please show me a pic that is proof of something in her ear.

Your pic looks like a close-up of the tragus.

No, it rally isn't the tragus - but whatever.
I've moved on to try and find out WHY she uses earpieces, not whether she uses them and whether this object in her ear was an earpiece.

You moved on because you cannot prove what you claim, while still maintaining that there was something in her ear.

I got ya.

No , just keen to understand what was in her ear.

Apparently not.

You cannot prove what was in her ear and used a pic of a reflection off of her tragus or inner ear.

Do better man. This is actually quite simple.

a reply to: tommyjo

Obviously she is taking the ear piece in and out during that footage, but she moves so fast you can't even see her do it. /sarc

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: UKTruth

Again, please show me a pic that is proof of something in her ear.

Your pic looks like a close-up of the tragus.

No, it rally isn't the tragus - but whatever.
I've moved on to try and find out WHY she uses earpieces, not whether she uses them and whether this object in her ear was an earpiece.

You moved on because you cannot prove what you claim, while still maintaining that there was something in her ear.

I got ya.

No , just keen to understand what was in her ear.

Apparently not.

You cannot prove what was in her ear and used a pic of a reflection off of her tragus or inner ear.

Do better man. This is actually quite simple.

Yep, conceded.

originally posted by: kaylaluv
a reply to: tommyjo

Obviously she is taking the ear piece in and out during that footage, but she moves so fast you can't even see her do it. /sarc

Wait until the debates start. No doubt Hillary will be wearing her hair over her ears and of course the die-hard conspiracy people will be freaking out.

a reply to: tommyjo

And if she performs reasonably well and doesn't cough up a lung, it will then be obvious that she'll have been thoroughly and properly medicated for the debate..!

a reply to: Puppylove

You might want to research a little more before running with a tweet.
Fear Piece

originally posted by: Martin75
a reply to: stosh64
Thanks for linking that in.

So, who is controlling Hillary behind the scenes? Who is it that is telling her what to say and how to respond? That is a very important question that we will probably never get the answer to.

Her PR team.

a reply to: lance_covel

Yeah the pic was distorted to deceive. Still does not change that an ear does not normally look like that. As shown by none of the counter samples having said distortion. So yep I was tricked. Still saying that pic showed a normal looking ear remains ridiculous.

Can this be thrown into the hoax forum now?

www.snopes.com...

a reply to: theantediluvian

One of the problems with ATS threads is that the Titles don't show punctuations. Depending on how the words are arranged, a thread title that is really a question, looks like a statement. Not that it's a big deal to most members/visitors, but personally, I usually ignore news headlines that end in a question mark (?).

a reply to: kruphix


snopes is not reliable anymore....you can still clearly see the earpiece on video!

www.youtube.com...

a reply to: imitator

Is Fox News reliable to you Trump supporters?

I just saw a segment on Fox where they were LAUGHING at the people trying to say this is true.

They said themselves, it is completely false.


EDIT: Yeah, that's her ear.

a reply to: kruphix

Sorry I don't watch MSM..... besides it's a hidden earpiece.... how would they know it's false?

her guilt was showing today..... hair looking like ear muffs!!!!

NYPD sources involved with the NBC forum’s security detail confirm Clinton was wearing an ‘inductive earpiece.’

originally posted by: kruphix
Can this be thrown into the hoax forum now?

www.snopes.com...

No, it's been just too entertaining.

Carry on..

a reply to: AnkhMorpork

Has anyone ever heard of an extended-release lung irritation suppressant that is administered via the inner-ear? A slow drip drip drip thingy?