It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Help ATS via PayPal:
learn more

9/11 Suspects

page: 2
24
<< 1    3 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Sep, 8 2016 @ 11:22 AM
link   
a reply to: PublicOpinion

Another suspect who was DEFINITELY in the know is Larry Silverstein who owned the towers.

Just happened not to show up to work that day and filed terrorism insurance coverage on the towers shortly before the attacks...nothing to see there folks.

He sure made a lot of money of those towers collapsing!




posted on Sep, 8 2016 @ 11:22 AM
link   

originally posted by: stinkelbaum
a reply to: DigitalVigilante420



I'd like someone to logically refute the Dancing Israelis sent to document the event...

Another smoking gun.

easy.


My reading comprehension is flawed, please indicate which portion of your link proves your point.

Thanks in advance.



posted on Sep, 8 2016 @ 04:01 PM
link   
a reply to: FamCore




In the days following 9/11, how were the well-connected Saudis (and supposed relatives of Bin Laden) granted government permission to fly out of the country when airways were still closed to all other flights and Americans couldn't fly into the country??



I think we all know how...people just dont want to go there.



posted on Sep, 8 2016 @ 09:00 PM
link   
a reply to: DigitalVigilante420







Another suspect who was DEFINITELY in the know is Larry Silverstein who owned the towers.

Just happened not to show up to work that day and filed terrorism insurance coverage on the towers shortly before the attacks...nothing to see there folks.

He sure made a lot of money of those towers collapsing!



1) Silverstein did not own the WTC - was (is) owned by the Port Authority of NY Silverstein was renting it

2) Terrorism insurance - was required by the people putting up the money to insure their investment. Silverstein
wanted 1 billion in coverage. Lenders wanted 7 billion. Settled on 3.55 billion for complex. Strange on how Silverstein
wanted LESS coverage

3) Silverstein LOST lot of money - as per lease still had to pay rent (10 million per month) on smoking hole in ground
Also had to rebuild the destroyed buildings

3 strikes.... YOU'RE OUT..........



posted on Sep, 8 2016 @ 09:00 PM
link   
a reply to: DigitalVigilante420







Another suspect who was DEFINITELY in the know is Larry Silverstein who owned the towers.

Just happened not to show up to work that day and filed terrorism insurance coverage on the towers shortly before the attacks...nothing to see there folks.

He sure made a lot of money of those towers collapsing!



1) Silverstein did not own the WTC - was (is) owned by the Port Authority of NY Silverstein was renting it

2) Terrorism insurance - was required by the people putting up the money to insure their investment. Silverstein
wanted 1 billion in coverage. Lenders wanted 7 billion. Settled on 3.55 billion for complex. Strange on how Silverstein
wanted LESS coverage

3) Silverstein LOST lot of money - as per lease still had to pay rent (10 million per month) on smoking hole in ground
Also had to rebuild the destroyed buildings

3 strikes.... YOU'RE OUT..........



posted on Sep, 8 2016 @ 09:07 PM
link   
a reply to: MarioOnTheFly

Guess you missed part where the "dancing Israelis" spent next few months in jail getting 3rd degree from FBI/CIA

After interrogating them for weeks determined have nothing to contribute - were expelled from country as
FBI had nothing to charge them with



posted on Sep, 8 2016 @ 09:48 PM
link   
Please don't confuse them with the facts.
It messes with their conspiracy beliefs.



posted on Sep, 9 2016 @ 01:49 AM
link   
a reply to: firerescue




Guess you missed part where the "dancing Israelis" spent next few months in jail getting 3rd degree from FBI/CIA

After interrogating them for weeks determined have nothing to contribute - were expelled from country as
FBI had nothing to charge them with


I didnt miss that part. This however does not prove they had nothing to do with it. It was stated by the FBI stated that at least 2 of them where MOSSAD agents...there was also ample political pressure to have them released. They had no reason to talk. They were getting out...

What we can not discount here, are facts:

1. they were witnessed behaving strangely during a catastrophe. They were evidently taking pictures...the hive fives and the cheering...which they deny. The attorney of the arrested Israelis argued that the witness mistakenly thought they were cheering because she's was not privy to Israeli customs.


2. The owner of the moving company which "employed" these Israelis, disappeared the next day...leaving offices empty and busyness abandoned...never to return to the US.

3. The Israelis threatened publicly with a lawsuit for their mistreatment during those few months...but the lawsuit was never filed in the end...and they were never heard from again.

Let's be Sherlocks about this...



posted on Sep, 9 2016 @ 02:47 AM
link   
a reply to: MarioOnTheFly

So you think professional Mossad agents would behave like this in public ??

That it takes 5 people to film the WTC across the Hudson when 1 or 2 would do ??

At best they were "stringers" who might be used if necessary by real Mossad agents

What looks like here is bunch of over enthusiastic amateurs who got in way over their heads - acting like bunch
of monkeys at a scene of a national tragedy is sure way to get yourself noticed ......

Not something would expect of a professional intelligence agent



posted on Sep, 9 2016 @ 06:38 AM
link   
a reply to: DigitalVigilante420




and filed terrorism insurance coverage on the towers shortly before the attacks...nothing to see there folks.

He signed the lease on July 24.
So do you buy car insurance months before you buy the car ?

It's all these silly half truths and innuendos.



posted on Sep, 9 2016 @ 06:51 AM
link   

originally posted by: firerescue
a reply to: MarioOnTheFly

So you think professional Mossad agents would behave like this in public ??

That it takes 5 people to film the WTC across the Hudson when 1 or 2 would do ??

At best they were "stringers" who might be used if necessary by real Mossad agents

What looks like here is bunch of over enthusiastic amateurs who got in way over their heads - acting like bunch
of monkeys at a scene of a national tragedy is sure way to get yourself noticed ......

Not something would expect of a professional intelligence agent



well man...that's entirely subjective on your part...whether they are pros or beginners makes no difference at all. The FBI itself stated that two were found out to be Mossad agents. You might be right in a sense that they might be "backups" or "stringers"...but does that change the nature of the incident ? If they were really giving hive fives and cheering...does it matter if they are Mossad or not ?

This incident with the "dancing israelis" revolves around the question...did they have foreknowledge...their behavior and the behavior of the owner of the moving company is highly suspicious. Abandoning the working busyness the next day...leaving everything like you left in a hurry...never to return...

Come on man...



posted on Sep, 9 2016 @ 07:01 AM
link   
a reply to: firerescue



Silverstein's Lenders Want More Insurance - The Port Authority had carried only $1.5 billion in insurance coverage on all its buildings, including the WTC, but Silverstein’s lenders insist on more, eventually demanding $3.55 billion in cover. [AMERICAN LAWYER, 9/3/2002] After 9/11, Larry Silverstein will claim the attacks on the World Trade Center constituted two separate events, thereby entitling him to a double payout totaling over $7 billion. [DAILY TELEGRAPH, 10/9/2001; GUARDIAN, 8/18/2002] Eventually, after several years of legal wrangling, a total of $4.55 billion of insurance money will be paid out for the destruction of the WTC (see May 23, 2007).

www.historycommons.org...

1. You just embezzled 1 billion in the settlement

2. No lender wanted 7 billion.

3. It was Silverstein who claimed two seperate events, thus you're either a liar or still have to do some homework.


3 strikes and you're out.
Next time get your facts straight and provide usefull sources to avoid spreading silly half-truths maybe?

 


So... you folks couldn't debunk Corbetts videos and that's why you try to play the fact's advocate on sidenotes in this thread, whilst completely failing to do so? Kinda entertaining though, I'll give you that. The irony iron of the day is yours again:




posted on Sep, 9 2016 @ 08:11 AM
link   
a reply to: PublicOpinion


either that or they learned history from Philip Zelikow




posted on Sep, 9 2016 @ 09:05 AM
link   
a reply to: Tellurian

That's a good one! Well said.

I must have missed that vid, looks like a great addition as well. Watching it right now, thanks.




posted on Sep, 9 2016 @ 09:40 AM
link   


Hero of 9-11 my ass...

And special thanks to all the military types who managed to be honest and decent human beings, unlike this guy.



posted on Sep, 9 2016 @ 10:09 AM
link   
a reply to: PublicOpinion

This is a great thread and will be a great source to answer some of those nagging questions with a quick reference to this thread . Plus its becoming a series that should only keep giving .



posted on Sep, 9 2016 @ 05:14 PM
link   
a reply to: the2ofusr1

I want to place this vid to the thread . This is a look at the trading that happened around 911 and presented by a Professor of that kind of stuff when it comes to fraud .



posted on Sep, 9 2016 @ 07:54 PM
link   
a reply to: DigitalVigilante420

Think I found the part you've mentioned. 44:20 in this one - Robert Wright?






posted on Sep, 9 2016 @ 09:06 PM
link   
a reply to: PublicOpinion

Terrorism insurance was required by the lenders because in 1993 the WTC was bombed by terrorists causing
hundreds of millions in damage

Did you forget that little detail ...??

Silverstein wanted to skimp on this only trying to buy 1 billion in coverage, Lenders wanted more to cover their
investment After some back and forth decided on 3.55 billion in coverage

Lets see

2 airplanes, 2 separate buildings - Silverstein may have a point ........

there were 23 different companies involved in insuring the WTC complex. The wording for many of the policies
was still being worked on September 11 leading to all manner of confusion

Mow where did Silverstein embezzle 1 billion ?? Considering was still on hook for rent and to rebuild
all the destroyed buildings ........



posted on Sep, 9 2016 @ 09:10 PM
link   

originally posted by: PublicOpinion
a reply to: Tellurian

That's a good one! Well said.

I must have missed that vid, looks like a great addition as well. Watching it right now, thanks.


Does the video contain any proof?
Or is it more speculation ?

You know proof is something that will stand up in court.




top topics



 
24
<< 1    3 >>

log in

join