It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Xcathdra
a reply to: Greven
Yeah thats the header bs they are trying to spin. In the main body of text paragraphs are marked as well. That is the issue with the lie clinton told the FBI because emails she sent out not only contain header info they contain paragraph markings as well.
Second the NDA's she signed spells out her responsibility towards the handling of classified information (all levels). As an OCA she also should know better than to try and make a distinction about markings. Markings are not relevant when it comes to a person in her position and the NDA's she signed state the same. The NDA's also state that if their is info a person is not sure is classified or not to treat it as classified until the entity responsible for the information can give a determination.
Clinton violated her oath.
Clinton violated the NDA's she signed.
Clinton violated the MOA she signed with the Obama White House.
Clinton lied to Congress during her confirmation hearings with regards to the clinton foundation.
Clinton destroyed evidence by ignoring a hold order / subpoena.
I can keep going but the remainder of the list would take up several more pages.
Suffice it to say its always someone elses fault according to the Clintons and the laws that govern everyone else dont apply to this blind bat with no control.
The FBI identified three e-mail chains, encompassing eight individual e-mail exchanges to or from Clinton's personal e-mail accounts, which contained at least one paragraph marked "(C)," a marking ostensibly indicating the presence of of information classified at the CONFIDENTIAL level. The emails contained no additional markings, such as header or footer, indicating that they were classified. State confirmed through the FOIA review process that one of these three e-mail chains contains information which is currently classified at the CONFIDENTIAL level. State determined that the other two e-mail chains are currently UNCLASSIFIED. State did not provide a determination as to whether any of these three e-mails were classified at the time they were sent.
When asked about the e-mail chain containing "(C)" portion markings that State determined to currently contain CONFIDENTIAL information, Clinton stated she did not know what the "(C)" meant at the beginning of the paragraphs and speculated it was referencing paragraphs marked in alphabetical order. Clinton identified a "CONFIDENTIAL" header and footer (inserted by the FBI prior to the interview) and asked of the "(C)" related to the "CONFIDENTIAL" header and footer. Clinton did not believe the content of the e-mail was classified and questioned the classification determination. When asked of her knowledge regarding TOP SECRET, SECRET, and CONFIDENTIAL classification levels of USG information, Clinton responded that she did not pay attention to the "level" of classification and took all classified information seriously.
On July 2, 2016, the FBI interviewed Clinton. Clinton was aware that she was an Original Classification Authority (OCA) at State, however, she could not recall how often she used this authority nor could she recall any training or guidance provided by State. Clinton could not give an example of how the classification of a document was determined; rather she stated there was a process in place at State before her tenure, and she relied on career foreign service professionals to appropriately mark and handle classified information.
originally posted by: Justoneman
originally posted by: jimmyx
a reply to: Gryphon66
gryph...this won't be the last time this dead horse is beaten, but I am glad you are responding to it.
I am too and very glad, he is proving the opposite points so repeatedly I now have MY talking points sharpened and you guys are still totally brainwashed into la la land that it is now laughable to foreign members of ATS from their comments. We will lose the entire planet to tyranny with out due diligence and when we choose to willingly ignore bad players in the power struggle we all lose.
You've awakened common sense in the rest of us that you are not willing to entertain the facts but are willing to spin them to make sure "hrc can do or know no wrong". Time will not be on that sides team.