It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: tweetie
a reply to: howmuch4another
I was just showing what Vandenberg informs the public.
originally posted by: tweetie
They have an ideal and large spot right on the ocean and plenty of privacy.
They can probably launch at sea even.
Built in 2005, the runway covers a dirt landing strip from the 1950s, when the wide, flat valley was used for atomic bomb test shots. A small complex of buildings dominated by a large hangar with unusual clamshell doors dominates the southern end of the asphalt strip.
Unlike Area 51, which is protected by shoot-to-kill security and shielded from outside view by mountain ranges, Area 6 has only fences and visitor checkpoints. It can be seen at a distance from tour buses on the highway to historic bomb craters at the northern end of Yucca Flat.
Other than a few “Above Top Secret” forum posts from 2009, and a Wikipedia blurb that cites a 2011 Flightglobal story saying the runway is part of an unmanned aerial vehicle test facility, little has been written about the Area 6 runway.
originally posted by: Magnivea
a reply to: AdmireTheDistance
Don't consider this as a personal attack or anything of that nature, just an observation and a personal feeling on the subject.
I'm not saying I believe the OP or any other poster making unsubstantiated claims. Maybe he (and other "whistleblowers") are indeed insiders with special knowledge they feel the need to get out there. Maybe they're all varying degrees of delusional and sitting in a foil and mylar lined basement with reflective metallic spray paint covering the windows. That's the nature of internet anonymity.
I do, however, know two different people that have knowledge of some of the kinds of things ats would go nuts for but do not have "enough" proof to be able to post or share here or on any other internet platform without being torn to shreds so they both plan to hold their stories and evidence until something, somewhere happens that will make their evidence more believable.
To me that's just a waste. These are things every person should at least have access to the knowledge of whether or not they choose to use it. Instead it rots away waiting for the spark that will ignite a bit of thought in a more... Unconventional sort of way. I mean yes, some things gain traction but become a sort of joke to all but the most die hard believers (John Titor and more recently the Mandela Effect spring to mind) but most "out there" stories just fade into obscurity because of the first instinct by most to debunk or just plain make fun of.
Either way, I'm rambling. I will, though, finish reading through this thread (yes, I only made it 2 comments before responding but I felt a need to say something for once) and keep an eye out for the things the OP mentioned. Hell, instead of spending 4 hours lulling myself off with Reddit nosleep stories I may start to follow the bread crumbs. Keep an open mind.
originally posted by: tweetie
a reply to: Darkinsider
Any "conjecture" on SpaceX's destroyed rocket on Sept. 1st? Did someone already ask?
originally posted by: hounddoghowlie
a reply to: SeaWorthy
They can probably launch at sea even.
that is not a manned space launch facility that is a runway for aircraft. was built in 2005 just 11 years old.
and it had been known about since at least 2009. if you follow the links from your link you would have seen that it was talked about here on ATS, and can be seen on bomb carter tours.
as far as launching at sea, very doubtful. but it might be possible.
from the link inside your link
Built in 2005, the runway covers a dirt landing strip from the 1950s, when the wide, flat valley was used for atomic bomb test shots. A small complex of buildings dominated by a large hangar with unusual clamshell doors dominates the southern end of the asphalt strip.
Unlike Area 51, which is protected by shoot-to-kill security and shielded from outside view by mountain ranges, Area 6 has only fences and visitor checkpoints. It can be seen at a distance from tour buses on the highway to historic bomb craters at the northern end of Yucca Flat.
Other than a few “Above Top Secret” forum posts from 2009, and a Wikipedia blurb that cites a 2011 Flightglobal story saying the runway is part of an unmanned aerial vehicle test facility, little has been written about the Area 6 runway.
You know Area 51, but just what in the world is Area 6?
ATS Threads
Mystery Facility Southwest of Area 51
New Area 51 Imagery
Area's 1 throught 30 and Area 51 Information.
south west of Area 51 ?!
it's not really a secret.
originally posted by: Darkinsider
And that is the fact that we, the United States has infact, constructed craft, using back engineering of recovered alien craft.
originally posted by: and14263
a reply to: hopenotfeariswhatweneed
Does each device have a separate unique IP?
I would have thought if you were using a neighbor's connection and the CIA came knocking would they not bat an eyelid at an employee's house so close to the deception?
Anyway, that's all theoretical because I don't think this guy has inside info and I don't think anything will come of the thread.
He could just use Macdonald's wifi... ...