Defcon I inter-dimensional beings along with photographic evidence, video, experiments etc

a reply to: digidamage

If you could for example explain what "...the weather at June 6th of November..." means?

a reply to: digidamage

You also had "PC issues"? You're having weird changes on your devices, malfunctions? Any pattern, anything you take from experiencing that worth knowing?

What this means is, the first image i have 3 different types of displays yet the dramatic effect only focused on the laptop despite orientation, frame rate of monitor, compression, and an endless array of other test i ruled out. It literally was doing this real world.

I quickly out of testing everything decided suppose i bounce the image from a small pinhole mirror, the resulting video left my jaw simply dropped... I had what appeared to be humanoid type "beings" inside the room monitoring my every step. I am currently desperately trying to get that video back. I still have the gear to recapture and may do a live capture on ustream or something.


(cont)

a reply to: digidamage

That's nice good, do set something random up, filming your room while you interact with the laptop.

a reply to: Peeple

"PC issues?" I run mostly mac for all my workstation needs, and its not device specific I've bought android phones as well both expensive and non-expensive along with my iPhone... Yes, I've determined that pinhole size hitting a mirror at a 90 degree angle with vertical feedback scan actually reveals things that are not visible in the room that move, interact, and also attempt to confuse by showing false imagery.

a reply to: digidamage

My first question is still unanswered, if you could explain what that means?

"The weather at June 6th of November"?

Anyone who would refuse to look at live video evidence and just proclaim this is the result of "episodic psychosis" seems more like an attack on one's character than any informed skeptical inquiry to me.

Then again, it seems the cognitive dissonance from what the evidence will clearly show could be too overwhelming for them to ever accept to begin with.

Just to rule out my own "sanity" however or lack thereof to some. I am not alone in my observations, also attacking someone proclaiming drug usage is the result seems against the ethos, or spirit of the the forum...? I assumed this was a place i could present my case without ridicule.

a reply to: digidamage

Muggles, right? Just ignore. Stay polite, they might surprise you, if you get to know them better.

a reply to: Peeple

Better yet, i can show you. The breakdown is simple you take a small circular metallic based mirror, that can be scanned up and down and put that at a 90 degree angle from your camera lens. I am uploading video to post showing live capture of what i have.

a reply to: digidamage

How can anyone make sense of anything you've presented?

You filmed yourself for 10 minutes holding a needle threader....

Nut job or troll are the only two reasonable options.

Get help, seriously.

a reply to: Peeple

Muggles?

No, just not pandering to his delusions.

a reply to: Chadwickus

I am just offering a valve. Without judging, just curious.

a reply to: Peeple

Fair enough.

I shall bow out, good luck.

a reply to: Chadwickus

Let's hope he comes back, right?

I dont understand your videos tbh what are you trying to prove? And can't u wear a t shirt while doing these things ? Lola reply to: digidamage

a reply to: Chadwickus

No-one forced you to even enter the thread, get a grip mate

OP, what you're trying to say is quite hard to follow for people who are less intelligent as you, like myself for example.
But it's an interesting thread and I hope you continue with it.

a reply to: skyblueworld

Hopefully he'll upload a 2 hour vid of a thimble next.

Shoukd keep you riveted for ages.

a reply to: Chadwickus

Haha, you actually watched? You know that's the whole point, he got you. Burn!

I didn't...

You're new to the internet?




I gave you a star, hope it helps

a reply to: Chadwickus

You taking 1 single video and extrapolating only 2 reasonable options? Both of which are dismissive entirely... I am sorry but your "skepticism" and ad homenems are unwarranted and in fact don't serve to further illustrate anything. The truth will prevail, and telling me to get help just classifies you as a general purpose shrill...


I am of complete sound mind, and able to distinguish between subjective internal reality and what i must conclude.

originally posted by: digidamage
Anyone who would refuse to look at live video evidence and just proclaim this is the result of "episodic psychosis" seems more like an attack on one's character than any informed skeptical inquiry to me.

Then again, it seems the cognitive dissonance from what the evidence will clearly show could be too overwhelming for them to ever accept to begin with.

Just to rule out my own "sanity" however or lack thereof to some. I am not alone in my observations, also attacking someone proclaiming drug usage is the result seems against the ethos, or spirit of the the forum...? I assumed this was a place i could present my case without ridicule.

I have always known a shadow realm exists, and many people over the ages have seen, heard, and felt their presence, and from what you are revealing it sounds like you have stumbled onto a way of recording these entities? They feed off of human energy and they can influence people's actions, but not too many people, especially the public are aware they are here, and a threat.
Now I understand why they might be watching you. OR trying to stop you. BE careful, and get your technique polished so you can document them more clearly if that's possible.

And never mind the ridicule, it's par for the course around here. Just ignore it.